Top Companies in Brazil by Revenue, Market cap and More [2019 Edition]
Brazil is the fifth largest country in the world. It was discovered on 22 April 1500 by the Portuguese sailor Pedro Álvares Cabral. At first, Brazil was primarily a source of natural materials, such as exceptional wood from Brazilian chestnut trees, dyes, sugar cane and later cotton and agricultural produce. An interesting fact is that Brasil has the longest river in America, and according to some researchers – also in the world.
1. Introduction
The Brazilian market is a very dynamically developing economic sector, which over the years has been growing more and more. In this article, I would like to bring you closer to the subject of the most profitable companies in Brazil. I present also top companies in Brazil with the most employees, market capital, number of stores and more. We hope that the presented data will be useful to you and will complement your knowledge. Without further ado, let’s start!
2. Quick summary
In Brazil, we will find a lot of interesting companies that are valued all over the world. At the moment, there is a huge number of companies, but the number is still growing. Therefore, if you are looking for the current status of worldwide companies, you need to visit datantify.com and check the database of companies in the location where you are interested and in a specific industry that you choose.
See also: Top Companies in Germany by Revenue, Market Cap and More
3. Top companies in Brazil by revenue
In this category we will discuss one of the most general determinants of the company’s wealth, it is exactly the annual revenue. This result represents the company’s proceeds from specific services or sales, depending on the company’s industry. Let’s take a look at the results.
# | Name | Revenue | Type | Founded | Headquarter | Links |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() | $514.4B | public | 1962 | Bentonville, US | |
2 | ![]() | $311.87B | public | 1907 | Den Haag, NL | |
3 | ![]() | $170.76B | public | 1876 | Dallas, US | |
4 | ![]() | $166.34B | public | 1879 | San Ramon, US | |
5 | ![]() | $148.9B | public | 1985 | Paris, FR | |
6 | ![]() | $110.58B | public | 1904 | Charlotte, US | |
7 | ![]() | $110.36B | public | 1975 | Redmond, US | |
8 | ![]() | $88.26B | public | 1866 | Vevey, CH | |
9 | ![]() | $86.34B | public | 1910 | Tokyo, JP | |
10 | ![]() | $83.91B | public | 1995 | Bonn, DE | |
11 | ![]() | $81.58B | public | 1886 | New Brunswick, US | |
12 | ![]() | $79.59B | public | 1911 | Armonk, US | |
13 | ![]() | $74.99B | subsidiary | 1998 | Mountain View, US | |
14 | ![]() | $70.85B | public | 1968 | Santa Clara, US | |
15 | ![]() | $68.91B | public | 1950 | Chiyoda-ku, JP | |
16 | ![]() | $60.28B | public | 1897 | Midland, US | |
17 | ![]() | $59.11B | public | 1948 | Nagoya, JP | |
18 | ![]() | $58.47B | public | 1939 | Palo Alto, US | |
19 | ![]() | $55.84B | public | 2004 | Menlo Park, US | |
20 | ![]() | $54.72B | public | 1925 | Peoria, US | |
21 | ![]() | $51.89B | public | 1958 | Seoul, KR | |
22 | ![]() | $49.11B | public | 1996 | Basel, CH | |
23 | ![]() | $46.4B | public | 1999 | Essen, DE | |
24 | ![]() | $43.96B | public | 1919 | Tokyo, JP | |
25 | ![]() | $43.03B | subsidiary | 1979 | Irvine, US | |
26 | ![]() | $42.29B | public | 1891 | Kenilworth, US | |
27 | ![]() | $41.8B | public | 1906 | Morris Plains, US | |
28 | ![]() | $41.6B | public | 1989 | Dublin 4, IE | |
29 | ![]() | $40.9B | public | 1921 | Tokyo, JP | |
30 | ![]() | $39.83B | public | 1977 | Redwood City, US | |
31 | ![]() | $39.2B | public | 1863 | Leverkusen, DE | |
32 | ![]() | $35.99B | public | 1935 | Minato, JP | |
33 | ![]() | $32.77B | public | 1902 | Maplewood, US | |
34 | ![]() | $31.86B | public | 1886 | Atlanta, US | |
35 | ![]() | $30.85B | public | 1939 | Palo Alto, US | |
36 | ![]() | $30.58B | public | 1991 | Illinois City, US | |
37 | ![]() | $29.74B | public | 1837 | Moline, US | |
38 | ![]() | $29.68B | public | 1935 | Englewood, US | |
39 | ![]() | $27.06B | public | 1922 | Waltham, US | |
40 | ![]() | $27.02B | public | 1984 | Doral, US | |
41 | ![]() | $26.49B | public | 1996 | Zürich, CH | |
42 | ![]() | $26.27B | public | 1972 | Newtown Square, US | |
43 | ![]() | $26.23B | public | 2015 | Chicago, US | |
44 | ![]() | $25.9B | public | 1899 | Tokyo, JP | |
45 | ![]() | $25.44B | public | 1969 | Singapore, SG | |
46 | ![]() | $24.72B | public | 1971 | Seattle, US | |
47 | ![]() | $24.7B | subsidiary | 1979 | Hopkinton, US | |
48 | ![]() | $23.77B | public | 1919 | Columbus, US | |
49 | ![]() | $23.54B | public | 2005 | Pantin, FR | |
50 | ![]() | $23.52B | public | 1902 | Paris, FR | |
51 | ![]() | $23.44B | public | 1930 | Monroe, US | |
52 | ![]() | $23.31B | public | 1898 | Memphis, US | |
53 | ![]() | $23.17B | public | 1997 | Nanterre, FR | |
54 | ![]() | $22.42B | public | 1876 | Düsseldorf, DE | |
55 | ![]() | $21.81B | public | 1988 | Irving, US | |
56 | ![]() | $21.04B | public | 1911 | Benton Harbor, US | |
57 | ![]() | $20.86B | public | 1876 | Stockholm, SE | |
58 | ![]() | $20.29B | public | 1891 | Amsterdam, NL | |
59 | ![]() | $20.16B | public | 1990 | Los Angeles, US | |
60 | ![]() | $20.08B | public | 1926 | Tokyo, JP | |
61 | ![]() | $19.28B | public | 1967 | Tokyo, JP | |
62 | ![]() | $19.16B | public | 1879 | München, DE | |
63 | ![]() | $18.35B | public | 1817 | London, GB | |
64 | ![]() | $17.75B | public | 1893 | Paris, FR | |
65 | ![]() | $17.59B | public | 1968 | Mumbai, IN | |
66 | ![]() | $17.44B | public | 2016 | Plymouth, US | |
67 | ![]() | $16.37B | public | 1823 | Slough, GB | |
68 | ![]() | $16.24B | public | 1942 | Montréal, CA | |
69 | ![]() | $16.12B | public | 1994 | Paris, FR | |
70 | ![]() | $15.79B | public | 1997 | Los Gatos, US | |
71 | ![]() | $15.37B | public | 1883 | Pittsburgh, US | |
72 | ![]() | $14.98B | public | 1947 | Dallas, US | |
73 | ![]() | $14.86B | public | 2015 | Atlanta, US | |
74 | ![]() | $14.48B | public | 1853 | Tokyo, JP | |
75 | ![]() | $14.3B | public | 1918 | Cleveland, US | |
76 | ![]() | $14.01B | public | 1888 | New York, US | |
77 | ![]() | $13.6B | public | 1941 | Portage, US | |
78 | ![]() | $13.4B | public | 1888 | Pittsburgh, US | |
79 | ![]() | $13.28B | public | 1999 | San Francisco, US | |
80 | ![]() | $12.91B | public | 1948 | Roma, IT | |
81 | ![]() | $12.65B | public | 1863 | Bruxelles, BE | |
82 | ![]() | $12.49B | public | 1944 | Nagaokakyo, JP | |
83 | ![]() | $11.8B | public | 1981 | Bengaluru, IN | |
84 | ![]() | $11.72B | public | 1993 | Santa Clara, US | |
85 | ![]() | $11.63B | public | 1880 | Broomfield, US | |
86 | ![]() | $11.44B | public | 1907 | Danbury, US | |
87 | ![]() | $11.29B | public | 1851 | Corning, US | |
88 | ![]() | $11.22B | public | 1996 | Bellevue, US | |
89 | ![]() | $10.82B | public | 2005 | Köln, DE | |
90 | ![]() | $10.73B | public | 1935 | Tokyo, JP | |
91 | ![]() | $10.24B | public | 1997 | New York, US | |
92 | ![]() | $10.15B | public | 1920 | Kingsport, US | |
93 | ![]() | $9.66B | public | 1902 | Heerlen, NL | |
94 | ![]() | $9.66B | public | 1987 | Plan-les-Ouates, CH | |
95 | ![]() | $9.5B | subsidiary | 1971 | Atlanta, US | |
96 | ![]() | $9.42B | public | 1862 | Stockholm, SE | |
97 | ![]() | $9.38B | public | 1970 | The Woodlands, US | |
98 | ![]() | $9.03B | public | 1982 | San Jose, US | |
99 | ![]() | $8.97B | public | 1998 | Palo Alto, US | |
100 | ![]() | $8.93B | public | 1940 | Allentown, US |
As you can see from the table, Walmart also conquered the southern part of America. It beats its competitor from the second-place – The British-Dutch petrochemical company Shell with amounted revenue $311.87B – with almost double the revenue of $514.4B. The result of this American company is impressive. What is curiosity we will see this company on top also in our other reports…
Let’s finish these spoilers and fly further with another category.
4. Top Brazil companies by Market Capitalization
One of the easiest ways to check if a company is worthy is to check its statistics on the market cap. That’s where you’ll practically find out the most. Why would I do that? Well, it is quite simple – a company that conducts its business activity and develops dynamically increases the value of the company’s shares. In short, if the company is prosperous and has plans for development, people invest in it on the stock exchange, creating an increase in this value. Without further ado let see the largest Brazilian companies that reached the very peak of the market cap.
# | Name | Market cap. | Type | Founded | Headquarter | Links |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() | $967.12B | public | 1975 | Redmond, US | |
2 | ![]() | $553.43B | public | 2004 | Menlo Park, US | |
3 | ![]() | $378.14B | public | 1886 | New Brunswick, US | |
4 | ![]() | $290.01B | public | 1962 | Bentonville, US | |
5 | ![]() | $289.71B | public | 1904 | Charlotte, US | |
6 | ![]() | $253.26B | public | 1966 | Harrison, US | |
7 | ![]() | $229.31B | public | 1968 | Santa Clara, US | |
8 | ![]() | $224.02B | public | 1876 | Dallas, US | |
9 | ![]() | $221.69B | public | 1879 | San Ramon, US | |
10 | ![]() | $206.78B | public | 1886 | Atlanta, US | |
11 | ![]() | $205.3B | public | 1891 | Kenilworth, US | |
12 | ![]() | $187.25B | public | 1977 | Redwood City, US | |
13 | ![]() | $172.37B | public | 2008 | Leuven, BE | |
14 | ![]() | $165.56B | public | 1997 | Los Gatos, US | |
15 | ![]() | $162.82B | public | 1812 | New York, US | |
16 | ![]() | $152.07B | public | 1972 | Newtown Square, US | |
17 | ![]() | $146.13B | public | 1909 | London, GB | |
18 | ![]() | $138.82B | public | 1991 | Illinois City, US | |
19 | ![]() | $136.45B | public | 1982 | San Jose, US | |
20 | ![]() | $125.9B | public | 1999 | San Francisco, US | |
21 | ![]() | $125.62B | public | 1906 | Morris Plains, US | |
22 | ![]() | $124.47B | public | 1911 | Armonk, US | |
23 | ![]() | $112.42B | public | 1989 | Dublin 4, IE | |
24 | ![]() | $111.36B | public | 1993 | Santa Clara, US | |
25 | ![]() | $105.51B | public | 1902 | Maplewood, US | |
26 | ![]() | $100.37B | public | 1997 | London, GB | |
27 | ![]() | $94.55B | public | 1971 | Seattle, US | |
28 | ![]() | $83.43B | public | 1998 | Palo Alto, US | |
29 | ![]() | $81.05B | public | 1935 | New York, US | |
30 | ![]() | $79.56B | public | 1857 | Madrid, ES | |
31 | ![]() | $78.21B | public | 1925 | Peoria, US | |
32 | ![]() | $76.11B | public | 1869 | New York, US | |
33 | ![]() | $75.01B | public | 1988 | New York, US | |
34 | ![]() | $71.29B | public | 1941 | Portage, US | |
35 | ![]() | $66.84B | public | 1832 | Toronto, CA | |
36 | ![]() | $65.87B | public | 1929 | London, GB | |
37 | ![]() | $64.21B | public | Rio de Janeiro, BR | ||
38 | ![]() | $61.35B | public | 1943 | Vila Yara, BR | |
39 | ![]() | $54.84B | public | 1986 | Dublin, IE | |
40 | ![]() | $53.16B | public | 1837 | Moline, US | |
41 | ![]() | $53.15B | public | 1923 | Naperville, US | |
42 | ![]() | $50.52B | public | 1817 | Toronto, CA | |
43 | ![]() | $50.18B | public | 1922 | Waltham, US | |
44 | ![]() | $49.81B | public | 2004 | Santa Clara, US | |
45 | ![]() | $47.63B | public | 1899 | Toronto, CA | |
46 | ![]() | $47.31B | public | 1907 | Danbury, US | |
47 | ![]() | $46.14B | public | 1940 | Allentown, US | |
48 | ![]() | $45.97B | public | 1998 | San Diego, US | |
49 | ![]() | $45.22B | public | 1981 | Bengaluru, IN | |
50 | ![]() | $45.13B | public | 1868 | New York, US | |
51 | ![]() | $43.24B | public | 1988 | Zürich, CH | |
52 | ![]() | $43.22B | public | 1919 | London, GB | |
53 | ![]() | $42.37B | public | 1924 | Madrid, ES | |
54 | ![]() | $41.37B | public | 1903 | Dearborn, US | |
55 | ![]() | $40.1B | public | 1998 | Redwood City, US | |
56 | ![]() | $40.09B | public | 1897 | Midland, US | |
57 | ![]() | $39.86B | public | 1857 | Bilbao, ES | |
58 | ![]() | $39.24B | public | 2015 | Chicago, US | |
59 | ![]() | $38.45B | public | 1891 | Amsterdam, NL | |
60 | ![]() | $38.06B | public | 1982 | San Rafael, US | |
61 | ![]() | $36.59B | public | 1690 | London, GB | |
62 | ![]() | $36.55B | public | 1909 | New York, US | |
63 | ![]() | $33.73B | public | 1994 | Paris, FR | |
64 | ![]() | $33.51B | public | 1984 | Brookfield, US | |
65 | ![]() | $31.82B | public | 1856 | Zurich, CH | |
66 | ![]() | $31.69B | public | 1876 | Stockholm, SE | |
67 | ![]() | $31.11B | public | 1939 | Palo Alto, US | |
68 | ![]() | $30.82B | public | 2006 | Eindhoven, NL | |
69 | ![]() | $30.79B | public | 2008 | Toronto, CA | |
70 | ![]() | $30.71B | public | 2006 | San Francisco, US | |
71 | ![]() | $30.65B | public | 1928 | Minneapolis, US | |
72 | ![]() | $29.88B | public | 1932 | Wallingford, US | |
73 | ![]() | $29.87B | public | 1846 | London, GB | |
74 | ![]() | $29.0B | public | 1865 | Espoo, FI | |
75 | ![]() | $27.45B | public | 1883 | Pittsburgh, US | |
76 | ![]() | $26.65B | public | 1919 | Columbus, US | |
77 | ![]() | $25.12B | public | 1851 | Corning, US | |
78 | ![]() | $24.83B | public | 1999 | Santa Clara, US | |
79 | ![]() | $24.6B | public | 2006 | Stockholm, SE | |
80 | ![]() | $24.39B | public | 1902 | Chicago, US | |
81 | ![]() | $24.24B | public | 1919 | Houston, US | |
82 | ![]() | $23.62B | public | 1928 | Chicago, US | |
83 | ![]() | $23.44B | public | 1971 | Jersey City, US | |
84 | ![]() | $23.23B | public | 1828 | London, GB | |
85 | ![]() | $22.93B | public | 2000 | Atlanta, US | |
86 | ![]() | $22.9B | public | 1918 | Cleveland, US | |
87 | ![]() | $22.79B | public | 1959 | London, GB | |
88 | ![]() | $22.28B | public | 1979 | Kansas City, US | |
89 | ![]() | $22.22B | public | 2000 | Norcross, US | |
90 | ![]() | $21.83B | public | 1939 | Palo Alto, US | |
91 | ![]() | $20.98B | public | 1895 | Melbourne, US | |
92 | ![]() | $20.97B | public | 1903 | Milwaukee, US | |
93 | ![]() | $20.63B | public | 2007 | Pleasanton, US | |
94 | ![]() | $20.29B | public | 1967 | Winona, US | |
95 | ![]() | $20.05B | public | 1880 | Broomfield, US | |
96 | ![]() | $19.87B | public | 1930 | Berwyn, US | |
97 | ![]() | $19.67B | public | 1988 | San Jose, US | |
98 | ![]() | $19.41B | public | 1906 | Battle Creek, US | |
99 | ![]() | $18.94B | public | 1989 | Columbus, US | |
100 | ![]() | $18.91B | public | 1996 | Bellevue, US |
Learn more about our ranking using policy
5. Brazilian corporations by number of stores
Another category that we will take into account is information about the largest companies according to the number of stores. Thanks to this factor we can also describe the best companies, but don’t forget that the number of stores doesn’t always give witness to the high quality, but we still want to present you this valuable information. So let’s jump in, and take a look at the largest companies in Brazil by the number of stores!
# | Name | Stores | Type | Founded | Headquarter | Links |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() | 30 | subsidiary | 2005 | Pinheiros, BR | |
2 | ![]() | 24 | public | 1988 | Zürich, CH | |
3 | ![]() | 18 | private | 1987 | Amstelveen, NL | |
4 | ![]() | 14 | private | 1998 | London, GB | |
5 | ![]() | 13 | public | 1902 | Heerlen, NL | |
6 | ![]() | 12 | private | 1845 | New York, US | |
7 | ![]() | 12 | public | 1888 | Amsterdam, NL | |
8 | ![]() | 12 | public | 2008 | Toronto, CA | |
9 | ![]() | 10 | public | 1986 | Blue Bell, US | |
10 | ![]() | 9 | public | 1967 | Paris, FR | |
11 | ![]() | 7 | public | 1919 | London, GB | |
12 | ![]() | 5 | public | 1939 | Palo Alto, US | |
13 | ![]() | 5 | public | 1923 | New York, US | |
14 | ![]() | 5 | private | 1983 | Johannesburg, ZA | |
15 | ![]() | 5 | private | 1965 | Cambridge, US | |
16 | ![]() | 5 | public | 1906 | Freienbach, CH | |
17 | ![]() | 5 | public | 1979 | Stamford, US | |
18 | ![]() | 5 | public | 1992 | Greenville, US | |
19 | ![]() | 4 | public | 1925 | Peoria, US | |
20 | ![]() | 4 | public | 1985 | Paris, FR | |
21 | ![]() | 4 | public | 1879 | München, DE | |
22 | ![]() | 4 | public | 1876 | Düsseldorf, DE | |
23 | ![]() | 4 | private | 1926 | New York, US | |
24 | ![]() | 4 | public | 1951 | Boston, US | |
25 | ![]() | 4 | public | 1966 | Pasadena, US | |
26 | ![]() | 4 | subsidiary | 1993 | Raleigh, US | |
27 | ![]() | 4 | public | 1999 | Helsinki, FI | |
28 | ![]() | 4 | public | 1828 | London, GB | |
29 | ![]() | 4 | public | 1973 | Paris, FR | |
30 | ![]() | 4 | private | 2001 | Boston, US | |
31 | ![]() | 3 | public | 1994 | Paris, FR | |
32 | ![]() | 3 | public | 1904 | Charlotte, US | |
33 | ![]() | 3 | public | 1997 | Bezons, FR | |
34 | ![]() | 3 | public | 1968 | Santa Clara, US | |
35 | ![]() | 3 | public | 1921 | Tokyo, JP | |
36 | ![]() | 3 | public | 1923 | Naperville, US | |
37 | ![]() | 3 | public | 1856 | Zurich, CH | |
38 | ![]() | 3 | public | 1915 | Tokyo , JP | |
39 | ![]() | 3 | public | 1877 | Delaware, US | |
40 | ![]() | 3 | public | 1807 | Niederweningen, CH | |
41 | ![]() | 3 | public | 1895 | Hagalund, SE | |
42 | ![]() | 3 | public | 1958 | Milford, US | |
43 | ![]() | 3 | public | 2000 | Norcross, US | |
44 | ![]() | 3 | public | 1914 | Milwaukee, US | |
45 | ![]() | 3 | public | 1984 | Doral, US | |
46 | ![]() | 3 | subsidiary | 2008 | Rueil-Malmaison, FR | |
47 | ![]() | 3 | public | 1845 | Hemel Hempstead, GB | |
48 | ![]() | 3 | public | 2009 | Mountain View, US | |
49 | ![]() | 3 | subsidiary | 2005 | Waltham, US | |
50 | ![]() | 3 | private | 1998 | Cambuí, BR | |
51 | ![]() | 3 | private | 2010 | São Paulo, BR | |
52 | ![]() | 3 | private | 2006 | Perdizes, BR | |
53 | ![]() | 2 | public | 1876 | Dallas, US | |
54 | ![]() | 2 | public | 1971 | Seattle, US | |
55 | ![]() | 2 | public | 1969 | Singapore, SG | |
56 | ![]() | 2 | public | 1989 | Dublin 4, IE | |
57 | ![]() | 2 | public | 1977 | Redwood City, US | |
58 | ![]() | 2 | subsidiary | 1998 | Mountain View, US | |
59 | ![]() | 2 | private | 1987 | Shenzhen, CN | |
60 | ![]() | 2 | public | 1999 | Noida, IN | |
61 | ![]() | 2 | public | 1935 | Minato, JP | |
62 | ![]() | 2 | public | 1783 | Chicago, US | |
63 | ![]() | 2 | public | 1990 | Los Angeles, US | |
64 | ![]() | 2 | public | 1972 | Newtown Square, US | |
65 | ![]() | 2 | public | 1942 | Montréal, CA | |
66 | ![]() | 2 | public | 1893 | Paris, FR | |
67 | ![]() | 2 | public | 1939 | Palo Alto, US | |
68 | ![]() | 2 | public | 2015 | Atlanta, US | |
69 | ![]() | 2 | public | 1898 | Memphis, US | |
70 | ![]() | 2 | public | 1906 | Los Angeles, US | |
71 | ![]() | 2 | public | 1987 | Plan-les-Ouates, CH | |
72 | ![]() | 2 | public | 1851 | Corning, US | |
73 | ![]() | 2 | public | 1823 | Slough, GB | |
74 | ![]() | 2 | public | 1884 | Atlanta, US | |
75 | ![]() | 2 | public | 1947 | Chiyoda, JP | |
76 | ![]() | 2 | public | 1919 | Tokyo, JP | |
77 | ![]() | 2 | subsidiary | 2000 | Frankfurt, DE | |
78 | ![]() | 2 | public | 1888 | New York, US | |
79 | ![]() | 2 | public | 2004 | Menlo Park, US | |
80 | ![]() | 2 | public | 1923 | Houston, US | |
81 | ![]() | 2 | public | 1994 | Detroit, US | |
82 | ![]() | 2 | public | 1903 | Milwaukee, US | |
83 | ![]() | 2 | public | 1967 | Evansville, US | |
84 | ![]() | 2 | public | 1926 | Tokyo, JP | |
85 | ![]() | 2 | private | 1963 | Boston, US | |
86 | ![]() | 2 | public | 1994 | London, GB | |
87 | ![]() | 2 | public | 1836 | Alphen aan den Rijn, NL | |
88 | ![]() | 2 | public | 1881 | Tokyo, JP | |
89 | ![]() | 2 | subsidiary | 1996 | Greater London, GB | |
90 | ![]() | 2 | public | 1966 | Harrison, US | |
91 | ![]() | 2 | public | 1959 | London, GB | |
92 | ![]() | 2 | public | 1940 | Allentown, US | |
93 | ![]() | 2 | public | 1991 | Waterloo, CA | |
94 | ![]() | 2 | public | 1902 | Clayton, US | |
95 | ![]() | 2 | public | 1927 | Chicago, US | |
96 | ![]() | 2 | public | 2000 | Atlanta, US | |
97 | ![]() | 2 | public | 1992 | Burlington, US | |
98 | ![]() | 2 | subsidiary | 1880 | Oxford, GB | |
99 | ![]() | 2 | public | 1895 | Cleveland, US | |
100 | ![]() | 2 | private | 2010 | New York, US |
As we can see in the first place is Tivit with 30 stores in Brazil. As you have noticed, the result is not so spectacular for the size of the whole country as compared to other foreign countries. In comparison with the USA, the largest company in terms of the number of stores is the Chipotle Mexican Grill restaurant chain, which has over 650 stores! It’s a big difference, isn’t it?
6. Top Brazil companies by employees
In this section, we discuss the number of agents employed by the largest companies. These results can easily illustrate to you how a company operates and whether it is developing well. A large number of employees proves that there is a market demand for the service or products of the company, which results in employing more people. In addition, the fact that the company has a large number of employees must go hand in hand with the fact that the company has sufficient profits to hire such people.
Let’s see what the numbers in our statistics of the list of companies in brazil look like:
# | Name | Employees | Type | Founded | Headquarter | Links |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() | 2200000 | public | 1962 | Bentonville, US | |
2 | ![]() | 488946 | public | 1901 | Søborg, DK | |
3 | ![]() | 459000 | public | 1989 | Dublin 4, IE | |
4 | ![]() | 417929 | public | 1968 | Mumbai, IN | |
5 | ![]() | 350600 | public | 1911 | Armonk, US | |
6 | ![]() | 323000 | public | 1866 | Vevey, CH | |
7 | ![]() | 320000 | public | 1960 | Ann Arbor, US | |
8 | ![]() | 305289 | public | 1910 | Tokyo, JP | |
9 | ![]() | 291000 | public | 1971 | Seattle, US | |
10 | ![]() | 281600 | public | 1994 | Paris, FR | |
11 | ![]() | 268000 | public | 1876 | Dallas, US | |
12 | ![]() | 263900 | private | 1845 | New York, US | |
13 | ![]() | 250930 | private | 1998 | London, GB | |
14 | ![]() | 215675 | public | 1995 | Bonn, DE | |
15 | ![]() | 211313 | public | 1967 | Paris, FR | |
16 | ![]() | 205000 | public | 1904 | Charlotte, US | |
17 | ![]() | 204107 | public | 1981 | Bengaluru, IN | |
18 | ![]() | 204000 | public | 1812 | New York, US | |
19 | ![]() | 202713 | public | 1857 | Madrid, ES | |
20 | ![]() | 200000 | public | 1969 | Singapore, SG | |
21 | ![]() | 199000 | public | 1903 | Dearborn, US | |
22 | ![]() | 193279 | private | 1987 | Amstelveen, NL | |
23 | ![]() | 181001 | public | 1665 | Courbevoie, FR | |
24 | ![]() | 180000 | private | 1987 | Shenzhen, CN | |
25 | ![]() | 172603 | public | 2008 | Leuven, BE | |
26 | ![]() | 161659 | subsidiary | 1998 | Mountain View, US | |
27 | ![]() | 160566 | public | 1929 | London, GB | |
28 | ![]() | 146600 | public | 1988 | Zürich, CH | |
29 | ![]() | 142340 | public | 1921 | Tokyo, JP | |
30 | ![]() | 140365 | public | 1935 | Minato, JP | |
31 | ![]() | 137000 | public | 1977 | Redwood City, US | |
32 | ![]() | 135100 | public | 1886 | New Brunswick, US | |
33 | ![]() | 131000 | public | 1975 | Redmond, US | |
34 | ![]() | 128584 | public | 1999 | Essen, DE | |
35 | ![]() | 125627 | public | 1857 | Bilbao, ES | |
36 | ![]() | 122110 | public | 1997 | Bezons, FR | |
37 | ![]() | 121597 | public | 1996 | Basel, CH | |
38 | ![]() | 120138 | public | 1924 | Madrid, ES | |
39 | ![]() | 120081 | public | 1999 | Noida, IN | |
40 | ![]() | 118196 | public | 1863 | Leverkusen, DE | |
41 | ![]() | 118006 | public | 1967 | Tokyo, JP | |
42 | ![]() | 115686 | public | 1997 | Nanterre, FR | |
43 | ![]() | 114000 | public | 1906 | Morris Plains, US | |
44 | ![]() | 111588 | public | 1985 | Paris, FR | |
45 | ![]() | 109390 | public | 1899 | Tokyo, JP | |
46 | ![]() | 108800 | public | 1968 | Santa Clara, US | |
47 | ![]() | 108234 | public | 1934 | Itajaí, BR | |
48 | ![]() | 105800 | public | 1846 | London, GB | |
49 | ![]() | 104000 | public | 1925 | Peoria, US | |
50 | ![]() | 103000 | public | 1865 | Espoo, FI | |
51 | ![]() | 103000 | public | 1991 | Illinois City, US | |
52 | ![]() | 102883 | public | 1935 | Tokyo, JP | |
53 | ![]() | 100750 | public | 1899 | Toronto, CA | |
54 | ![]() | 100735 | public | 1876 | Stockholm, SE | |
55 | ![]() | 98508 | public | 1832 | Toronto, CA | |
56 | ![]() | 98159 | public | 1943 | Vila Yara, BR | |
57 | ![]() | 97878 | public | 1936 | Yokohama-shi, JP | |
58 | ![]() | 97368 | public | 1878 | Genève, CH | |
59 | ![]() | 96498 | public | 1972 | Newtown Square, US | |
60 | ![]() | 93516 | public | 1902 | Maplewood, US | |
61 | ![]() | 92639 | public | 2005 | Pantin, FR | |
62 | ![]() | 92000 | public | 1911 | Benton Harbor, US | |
63 | ![]() | 90000 | public | 1783 | Chicago, US | |
64 | ![]() | 87000 | public | 1990 | Los Angeles, US | |
65 | ![]() | 85000 | public | 2016 | Plymouth, US | |
66 | ![]() | 83500 | public | 1690 | London, GB | |
67 | ![]() | 82000 | public | 1907 | Den Haag, NL | |
68 | ![]() | 80000 | public | 1906 | Los Angeles, US | |
69 | ![]() | 77739 | public | 1934 | Tokyo, JP | |
70 | ![]() | 77400 | public | 1891 | Amsterdam, NL | |
71 | ![]() | 77164 | public | 1950 | Chiyoda-ku, JP | |
72 | ![]() | 75326 | public | 1944 | Nagaokakyo, JP | |
73 | ![]() | 75000 | subsidiary | 1985 | Miami, US | |
74 | ![]() | 74413 | public | 1837 | Moline, US | |
75 | ![]() | 74400 | public | 1947 | Dallas, US | |
76 | ![]() | 74000 | public | 1976 | Montréal, CA | |
77 | ![]() | 73773 | public | 1958 | Seoul, KR | |
78 | ![]() | 73600 | public | 1932 | Wallingford, US | |
79 | ![]() | 72709 | subsidiary | 1979 | Hopkinton, US | |
80 | ![]() | 69700 | public | 1909 | London, GB | |
81 | ![]() | 69000 | public | 1891 | Kenilworth, US | |
82 | ![]() | 69000 | public | 1917 | London, GB | |
83 | ![]() | 68388 | subsidiary | 1947 | Duisburg, DE | |
84 | ![]() | 67000 | public | 1922 | Waltham, US | |
85 | ![]() | 66000 | public | 1893 | Paris, FR | |
86 | ![]() | 65000 | public | 1902 | Paris, FR | |
87 | ![]() | 64105 | public | Rio de Janeiro, BR | ||
88 | ![]() | 64010 | public | 1942 | Montréal, CA | |
89 | ![]() | 63299 | public | 1919 | Tokyo, JP | |
90 | ![]() | 62900 | public | 1962 | Roma, IT | |
91 | ![]() | 62610 | public | 1919 | Columbus, US | |
92 | ![]() | 62600 | public | 1886 | Atlanta, US | |
93 | ![]() | 62057 | public | 1879 | München, DE | |
94 | ![]() | 60348 | public | 1935 | New York, US | |
95 | ![]() | 60000 | public | 1919 | Houston, US | |
96 | ![]() | 60000 | public | 1939 | Palo Alto, US | |
97 | ![]() | 57700 | public | 1953 | Stockholm, SE | |
98 | ![]() | 57170 | public | 1918 | Cleveland, US | |
99 | ![]() | 56827 | public | 1948 | Nagoya, JP | |
100 | ![]() | 55000 | public | 1939 | Palo Alto, US |
None of the readers will be surprised by our verdict. Well, the largest company that employs the largest number of employees is Walmart, which is an American giant that conquers the market around the world. The company employs over 2200,000 people! Can you imagine? With so many workers, a small country could be created that would be one company. Amazing!
Check out how we get data for our rankings
7. Biggest Brazilian companies to work for
In the end, we will discuss a rather interesting category, which you will not find anywhere else. Well, we compared the statistics of employee appraisals concerning the comfort of work. The information we have collected will enable you to find the ideal employer for you, but also for a good partnership company to cooperation with. Let’s check the statistics below:
# | Name | Votes | Ratings | Culture & values | Work/life balance | Type | Headquarter | Links |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() | 10161 | 4.5 | 4.5 | 4.4 | public | Newtown Square, US | |
2 | ![]() | 4965 | 4.4 | 4.6 | 4.2 | public | San Francisco, US | |
3 | ![]() | 8609 | 4.4 | 4.4 | 4.1 | subsidiary | Mountain View, US | |
4 | ![]() | 21925 | 4.1 | 4.0 | 3.9 | public | Redmond, US | |
5 | ![]() | 8044 | 4.1 | 4.2 | 4.2 | public | Espoo, FI | |
6 | ![]() | 1821 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 3.9 | public | Moline, US | |
7 | ![]() | 4294 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 3.7 | public | London, GB | |
8 | ![]() | 2774 | 3.9 | 3.9 | 3.3 | public | Chicago, US | |
9 | ![]() | 2461 | 3.9 | 3.9 | 3.8 | public | Maplewood, US | |
10 | ![]() | 12644 | 3.9 | 3.8 | 3.8 | public | Santa Clara, US | |
11 | ![]() | 4934 | 3.9 | 4.1 | 3.9 | public | New Brunswick, US | |
12 | ![]() | 2048 | 3.9 | 4.2 | 4.0 | public | Palo Alto, US | |
13 | ![]() | 42120 | 3.9 | 3.9 | 3.4 | public | Dublin 4, IE | |
14 | ![]() | 3620 | 3.9 | 3.8 | 3.9 | public | Dearborn, US | |
15 | ![]() | 4365 | 3.9 | 3.8 | 3.8 | public | Den Haag, NL | |
16 | ![]() | 2672 | 3.9 | 3.9 | 4.0 | public | San Ramon, US | |
17 | ![]() | 5949 | 3.9 | 3.8 | 2.9 | public | New York, US | |
18 | ![]() | 2944 | 3.9 | 4.2 | 4.0 | public | Columbus, US | |
19 | ![]() | 1422 | 3.8 | 3.7 | 3.5 | public | Düsseldorf, DE | |
20 | ![]() | 1827 | 3.8 | 3.9 | 3.7 | public | Benton Harbor, US | |
21 | ![]() | 27837 | 3.8 | 3.8 | 3.0 | private | New York, US | |
22 | ![]() | 21269 | 3.8 | 4.0 | 3.5 | public | Seattle, US | |
23 | ![]() | 3171 | 3.7 | 3.6 | 3.7 | public | Kenilworth, US | |
24 | ![]() | 7198 | 3.7 | 3.9 | 3.5 | public | New York, US | |
25 | ![]() | 2718 | 3.7 | 3.7 | 3.6 | subsidiary | Miami, US | |
26 | ![]() | 1690 | 3.7 | 3.8 | 3.7 | public | Midland, US | |
27 | ![]() | 425 | 3.7 | 3.6 | 3.3 | public | Illinois City, US | |
28 | ![]() | 3224 | 3.7 | 3.6 | 3.5 | public | Los Angeles, US | |
29 | ![]() | 1299 | 3.7 | 3.7 | 4.0 | public | Plan-les-Ouates, CH | |
30 | ![]() | 2121 | 3.7 | 3.7 | 3.2 | private | Chicago, US | |
31 | ![]() | 36524 | 3.7 | 3.8 | 3.7 | public | Mumbai, IN | |
32 | ![]() | 2947 | 3.7 | 3.7 | 3.3 | public | Vevey, CH | |
33 | ![]() | 2872 | 3.7 | 3.5 | 3.5 | public | Basel, CH | |
34 | ![]() | 1785 | 3.6 | 3.4 | 3.6 | public | Paris, FR | |
35 | ![]() | 463 | 3.6 | 3.5 | 3.7 | public | Bonn, DE | |
36 | ![]() | 944 | 3.6 | 3.6 | 3.5 | public | Singapore, SG | |
37 | ![]() | 310 | 3.6 | 3.1 | 3.4 | public | Rio de Janeiro, BR | |
38 | ![]() | 29 | 3.6 | 3.5 | 3.9 | public | Nagaokakyo, JP | |
39 | ![]() | 6885 | 3.6 | 3.2 | 3.2 | public | Morris Plains, US | |
40 | ![]() | 2840 | 3.6 | 3.6 | 3.6 | public | Zürich, CH | |
41 | ![]() | 792 | 3.6 | 3.7 | 3.8 | public | Pantin, FR | |
42 | ![]() | 1897 | 3.6 | 3.8 | 3.8 | public | Minneapolis, US | |
43 | ![]() | 4921 | 3.6 | 3.5 | 3.4 | public | Atlanta, US | |
44 | ![]() | 4440 | 3.6 | 3.6 | 3.6 | public | Zurich, CH | |
45 | ![]() | 3059 | 3.6 | 3.5 | 3.6 | public | London, GB | |
46 | ![]() | 138 | 3.6 | 3.3 | 3.5 | public | Chiyoda-ku, JP | |
47 | ![]() | 3637 | 3.6 | 3.5 | 3.7 | public | Waltham, US | |
48 | ![]() | 21154 | 3.6 | 3.5 | 3.5 | public | Charlotte, US | |
49 | ![]() | 28271 | 3.6 | 3.5 | 3.4 | public | Paris, FR | |
50 | ![]() | 44000 | 3.6 | 3.6 | 3.7 | public | Armonk, US | |
51 | ![]() | 2739 | 3.6 | 3.6 | 3.5 | public | Chicago, US | |
52 | ![]() | 787 | 3.6 | 3.7 | 3.7 | public | Corning, US | |
53 | ![]() | 92 | 3.5 | 3.3 | 3.3 | public | Chiyoda, JP | |
54 | ![]() | 14418 | 3.5 | 3.5 | 3.3 | public | New York, US | |
55 | ![]() | 8967 | 3.5 | 3.5 | 3.7 | public | Palo Alto, US | |
56 | ![]() | 371 | 3.5 | 3.5 | 3.6 | public | Stockholm, SE | |
57 | ![]() | 4430 | 3.5 | 3.7 | 3.4 | public | New York, US | |
58 | ![]() | 8855 | 3.5 | 3.8 | 3.9 | public | Stockholm, SE | |
59 | ![]() | 182 | 3.5 | 3.0 | 3.0 | public | Kyoto, JP | |
60 | ![]() | 2679 | 3.5 | 3.5 | 3.5 | public | Dallas, US | |
61 | ![]() | 4258 | 3.5 | 3.7 | 3.7 | public | Amsterdam, NL | |
62 | ![]() | 791 | 3.5 | 3.1 | 3.4 | public | Montreal, CA | |
63 | ![]() | 21890 | 3.4 | 3.2 | 3.8 | public | Redwood City, US | |
64 | ![]() | 2918 | 3.4 | 3.2 | 2.9 | public | Houston, US | |
65 | ![]() | 395 | 3.4 | 3.2 | 3.2 | public | Stockholm, SE | |
66 | ![]() | 846 | 3.4 | 3.3 | 2.8 | public | Memphis, US | |
67 | ![]() | 3760 | 3.4 | 3.2 | 3.0 | public | Ann Arbor, US | |
68 | ![]() | 6191 | 3.4 | 3.4 | 3.6 | public | Montréal, CA | |
69 | ![]() | 1537 | 3.3 | 3.5 | 3.1 | public | Naperville, US | |
70 | ![]() | 32959 | 3.3 | 3.8 | 3.5 | public | Bengaluru, IN | |
71 | ![]() | 14470 | 3.3 | 3.3 | 3.3 | public | Paris, FR | |
72 | ![]() | 1220 | 3.3 | 2.9 | 3.0 | public | Cleveland, US | |
73 | ![]() | 901 | 3.3 | 3.5 | 3.4 | public | Paris, FR | |
74 | ![]() | 799 | 3.3 | 3.0 | 3.1 | public | München, DE | |
75 | ![]() | 1365 | 3.3 | 3.1 | 2.7 | public | Slough, GB | |
76 | ![]() | 12984 | 3.3 | 3.2 | 3.5 | public | Noida, IN | |
77 | ![]() | 799 | 3.3 | 3.1 | 3.4 | public | Essen, DE | |
78 | ![]() | 1951 | 3.3 | 3.0 | 3.2 | public | Zürich, CH | |
79 | ![]() | 3221 | 3.3 | 3.3 | 3.5 | public | New York, US | |
80 | ![]() | 1272 | 3.2 | 2.9 | 2.8 | public | Seoul, KR | |
81 | ![]() | 2831 | 3.2 | 3.1 | 3.1 | public | Atlanta, US | |
82 | ![]() | 40752 | 3.2 | 3.0 | 2.9 | public | Bentonville, US | |
83 | ![]() | 791 | 3.2 | 3.0 | 2.9 | public | Atlanta, US | |
84 | ![]() | 754 | 3.2 | 3.0 | 2.9 | public | Tokyo, JP | |
85 | ![]() | 4499 | 3.2 | 3.0 | 3.4 | public | Bezons, FR | |
86 | ![]() | 1625 | 3.2 | 3.3 | 3.6 | public | Paris, FR | |
87 | ![]() | 380 | 3.2 | 3.0 | 3.4 | public | Tokyo, JP | |
88 | ![]() | 214 | 3.2 | 3.0 | 3.1 | public | Wallingford, US | |
89 | ![]() | 2583 | 3.1 | 3.2 | 3.4 | public | Minato, JP | |
90 | ![]() | 4443 | 3.1 | 3.0 | 3.3 | public | Los Angeles, US | |
91 | ![]() | 204 | 3.1 | 3.0 | 3.1 | public | Plymouth, US | |
92 | ![]() | 519 | 3.1 | 2.8 | 3.0 | public | Søborg, DK | |
93 | ![]() | 1744 | 3.1 | 2.9 | 3.3 | public | Montréal, CA | |
94 | ![]() | 742 | 3.1 | 2.7 | 2.9 | subsidiary | Duisburg, DE | |
95 | ![]() | 1390 | 3.1 | 3.1 | 2.5 | public | Leuven, BE | |
96 | ![]() | 888 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 3.2 | public | Genève, CH | |
97 | ![]() | 240 | 3.0 | 2.8 | 2.9 | public | Tokyo, JP | |
98 | ![]() | 2673 | 2.9 | 3.0 | 3.1 | public | Madrid, ES | |
99 | ![]() | 917 | 2.9 | 2.9 | 3.3 | public | Yokohama-shi, JP | |
100 | ![]() | 157 | 2.41 | 2.4 | 2.7 | public | Nagoya, JP |
The positions are really interesting! The top result is unambiguous for SAP, which was the only Brazilian corporations that gained an average of 4.5 out of 5, out of over 10 thousand votes. However, there are also companies such as Salesforce, Google, Microsoft, Nokia, Deere & Company and Hyatt Hotels which achieved an average score of over 4.
I don’t know about you but I think that if I was looking for a job in Brazil I would try to go to these companies first ;)
Summary
We hope that the presented list of companies in brazil has helped you to enrich your knowledge. The Brazilian market is a very interesting market, which is gradually developing. As you have certainly noticed, the market in this country is largely controlled by foreign companies such as Microsoft or Walmart. It proves how big companies are expanding their activity – one could even say that they are conquering the world.
Remember that all the given statistics of the largest Brazilian companies and other countries are changing the whole time, so if you are looking for current companies’ data, visit datantify.com. Thanks to our service you will have current contact details, statistics and more. Such information is very useful for people who want to start their own business in specific countries. Thanks to us you can find potential clients, see what the market situation is like and much more! Thanks to us you will save your precious time and will certainly facilitate your start!
Do you want to compare yourself to the best? Check out our databases and jump to the top!

with active e-mails, phone numbers
and more