Top Companies in France by Revenue, Market cap and More [2019 Edition]
France – a country with the 3rd largest economy in the European Union. There are some main economic sectors that France operates in. The leading areas are telecommunications, pharmaceuticals, chemicals, automobile production, and shipbuilding. We can not forget about agriculture opportunities and a significant market share in the EU export. The country strongly supports international investors and entrepreneurs who want to boost the French economy. It is not surprising – the present high position is, after all, strongly determined by French companies. And we are sure these brands are not unfamiliar for you.
1. Introduction
Looking at the title of this article, it is easy to guess we would like to present top companies in France. The thing is, we decided to focus on some individual aspects which let a particular company be one of the biggest businesses in the country. So, in the paper, you can find information about the major French companies by revenue, market capitalization, number of stores, number of employees, and the best place to work.
2. Quick summary
The list presents companies from different industries and do not be surprised if you see the same name in more than one table. We can point giant IT companies in France, for example, Google or Microsoft. There are also electrical businesses – Mitsubishi Electric, Schneider Electric or Electricite de France. Follow the text with your eyes to see the biggest food and beverage companies. Names such as Nestle or Danone should sound familiar to you, shouldn’t they? Naturally, the list of various areas isn’t done here – check presented lists and find out for yourself!
3. Top companies in France by revenue
The first part of the article is dedicated to the biggest companies in France by revenue. The revenue is one of the most important figures in business – if the revenues minus the expenses give a positive result, we can talk about the profit. And when there is an earned profit, it means that the company has an opportunity to develop and attracts investors. According to the data from a table, the thing which strikes the eye is the revenue split. It starts with British-Dutch oil and gas company Shell. It has over $311B of the revenue! Let’s look at the other positions with considerable amounts:
# | Name | Revenue | Type | Founded | Headquarter | Links |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() | $311.87B | public | 1907 | Den Haag, NL | |
2 | ![]() | $267.55B | public | 1937 | Toyota City, JP | |
3 | ![]() | $232.89B | public | 1994 | Seattle, US | |
4 | ![]() | $183.98B | public | 1886 | Stuttgart, DE | |
5 | ![]() | $170.76B | public | 1876 | Dallas, US | |
6 | ![]() | $149.1B | public | 1924 | Courbevoie, FR | |
7 | ![]() | $148.9B | public | 1985 | Paris, FR | |
8 | ![]() | $121.61B | public | 1892 | Boston, US | |
9 | ![]() | $110.58B | public | 1904 | Charlotte, US | |
10 | ![]() | $110.36B | public | 1975 | Redmond, US | |
11 | ![]() | $88.26B | public | 1866 | Vevey, CH | |
12 | ![]() | $86.34B | public | 1910 | Tokyo, JP | |
13 | ![]() | $83.91B | public | 1995 | Bonn, DE | |
14 | ![]() | $81.87B | private | 1886 | Gerlingen, DE | |
15 | ![]() | $79.59B | public | 1911 | Armonk, US | |
16 | ![]() | $77.81B | public | 1946 | Tokyo, JP | |
17 | ![]() | $74.99B | subsidiary | 1998 | Mountain View, US | |
18 | ![]() | $72.69B | public | 1918 | Kadoma, JP | |
19 | ![]() | $71.33B | public | 1970 | Leiden, NL | |
20 | ![]() | $70.85B | public | 1968 | Santa Clara, US | |
21 | ![]() | $68.91B | public | 1950 | Chiyoda-ku, JP | |
22 | ![]() | $64.19B | subsidiary | 1969 | Bonn, DE | |
23 | ![]() | $63.02B | private | 1976 | Paris, FR | |
24 | ![]() | $60.28B | public | 1897 | Midland, US | |
25 | ![]() | $59.43B | public | 1923 | Burbank, US | |
26 | ![]() | $59.11B | public | 1948 | Nagoya, JP | |
27 | ![]() | $58.47B | public | 1939 | Palo Alto, US | |
28 | ![]() | $55.84B | public | 2004 | Menlo Park, US | |
29 | ![]() | $54.72B | public | 1925 | Peoria, US | |
30 | ![]() | $53.65B | public | 1849 | New York, US | |
31 | ![]() | $52.43B | public | Paris, FR | ||
32 | ![]() | $51.89B | public | 1958 | Seoul, KR | |
33 | ![]() | $49.33B | public | 1984 | San Jose, US | |
34 | ![]() | $49.11B | public | 1996 | Basel, CH | |
35 | ![]() | $48.89B | public | 1905 | Paris, FR | |
36 | ![]() | $47.73B | public | 1987 | Paris, FR | |
37 | ![]() | $46.4B | public | 1999 | Essen, DE | |
38 | ![]() | $45.35B | public | 1984 | Hong Kong, HK | |
39 | ![]() | $43.96B | public | 1919 | Tokyo, JP | |
40 | ![]() | $43.03B | subsidiary | 1979 | Irvine, US | |
41 | ![]() | $42.29B | public | 1891 | Kenilworth, US | |
42 | ![]() | $41.8B | public | 1906 | Morris Plains, US | |
43 | ![]() | $41.6B | public | 1989 | Dublin 4, IE | |
44 | ![]() | $41.49B | public | 2004 | Paris, FR | |
45 | ![]() | $40.9B | public | 1921 | Tokyo, JP | |
46 | ![]() | $39.83B | public | 1977 | Redwood City, US | |
47 | ![]() | $36.68B | public | 1999 | Hangzhou, CN | |
48 | ![]() | $36.41B | public | 1997 | Windsor, GB | |
49 | ![]() | $36.4B | public | 1972 | Beaverton, US | |
50 | ![]() | $36.31B | public | 1952 | Paris, FR | |
51 | ![]() | $35.99B | public | 1935 | Minato, JP | |
52 | ![]() | $35.95B | public | 1875 | Minato-ku, JP | |
53 | ![]() | $31.86B | public | 1886 | Atlanta, US | |
54 | ![]() | $31.4B | public | 1885 | Glendale, US | |
55 | ![]() | $30.85B | public | 1939 | Palo Alto, US | |
56 | ![]() | $29.68B | public | 1935 | Englewood, US | |
57 | ![]() | $29.14B | public | 1909 | Clichy, FR | |
58 | ![]() | $28.37B | public | 1985 | Arteixo, ES | |
59 | ![]() | $28.13B | public | 1853 | Paris, FR | |
60 | ![]() | $27.7B | public | 1836 | Rueil-Malmaison, FR | |
61 | ![]() | $26.49B | public | 1996 | Zürich, CH | |
62 | ![]() | $26.27B | public | 1972 | Newtown Square, US | |
63 | ![]() | $26.23B | public | 2015 | Chicago, US | |
64 | ![]() | $25.44B | public | 1969 | Singapore, SG | |
65 | ![]() | $24.72B | public | 1971 | Seattle, US | |
66 | ![]() | $24.7B | subsidiary | 1979 | Hopkinton, US | |
67 | ![]() | $24.59B | public | 1802 | Wilmington, US | |
68 | ![]() | $24.57B | public | 1919 | Paris, FR | |
69 | ![]() | $24.56B | public | 2017 | McLean, US | |
70 | ![]() | $23.54B | public | 2005 | Pantin, FR | |
71 | ![]() | $23.52B | public | 1902 | Paris, FR | |
72 | ![]() | $23.31B | public | 1898 | Memphis, US | |
73 | ![]() | $23.17B | public | 1997 | Nanterre, FR | |
74 | ![]() | $22.85B | public | 1966 | Issy-les-Moulineaux, FR | |
75 | ![]() | $22.82B | public | 1955 | Oak Brook, US | |
76 | ![]() | $22.78B | public | 1921 | Tokyo, JP | |
77 | ![]() | $22.73B | public | 1985 | San Diego, US | |
78 | ![]() | $22.42B | public | 1876 | Düsseldorf, DE | |
79 | ![]() | $21.81B | public | 1988 | Irving, US | |
80 | ![]() | $21.19B | public | 1884 | London, GB | |
81 | ![]() | $20.86B | public | 1876 | Stockholm, SE | |
82 | ![]() | $20.29B | public | 1891 | Amsterdam, NL | |
83 | ![]() | $20.16B | public | 1990 | Los Angeles, US | |
84 | ![]() | $18.46B | public | 1923 | Paris, FR | |
85 | ![]() | $18.35B | public | 1817 | London, GB | |
86 | ![]() | $18.28B | public | 1890 | Las Condes, CL | |
87 | ![]() | $17.77B | public | 2008 | Paris, FR | |
88 | ![]() | $17.75B | public | 1893 | Paris, FR | |
89 | ![]() | $17.64B | public | 2005 | San Jose, US | |
90 | ![]() | $17.59B | public | 1968 | Mumbai, IN | |
91 | ![]() | $17.44B | public | 2016 | Plymouth, US | |
92 | ![]() | $17.41B | public | 1890 | St. Louis, US | |
93 | ![]() | $16.37B | public | 1823 | Slough, GB | |
94 | ![]() | $16.24B | public | 1942 | Montréal, CA | |
95 | ![]() | $16.12B | public | 1994 | Paris, FR | |
96 | ![]() | $15.86B | public | 1969 | San Francisco, US | |
97 | ![]() | $15.78B | public | 1930 | Dallas, US | |
98 | ![]() | $15.7B | public | 1946 | Herzogenaurach, DE | |
99 | ![]() | $15.47B | public | 1898 | Akron, US | |
100 | ![]() | $15.14B | public | 1982 | London, GB |
Learn more about our ranking using policy
4. The biggest companies in France by market cap
Market capitalization (known as a “market cap”) is about the absolute market value of the entity’s outstanding shares. It is calculated by multiplying the current stock rate by outstanding shares. In this paragraph, you can see the biggest companies in France which has been ranked by its market cap. The top five positions go to known all over the world companies – Microsoft, Amazon, Facebook, Alibaba, and Bank of America.
# | Name | Market cap. | Type | Founded | Headquarter | Links |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() | $967.12B | public | 1975 | Redmond, US | |
2 | ![]() | $960.32B | public | 1994 | Seattle, US | |
3 | ![]() | $553.43B | public | 2004 | Menlo Park, US | |
4 | ![]() | $493.53B | public | 1999 | Hangzhou, CN | |
5 | ![]() | $289.71B | public | 1904 | Charlotte, US | |
6 | ![]() | $253.26B | public | 1966 | Harrison, US | |
7 | ![]() | $241.85B | public | 1984 | San Jose, US | |
8 | ![]() | $241.47B | public | 1923 | Burbank, US | |
9 | ![]() | $229.79B | public | 1849 | New York, US | |
10 | ![]() | $229.31B | public | 1968 | Santa Clara, US | |
11 | ![]() | $224.02B | public | 1876 | Dallas, US | |
12 | ![]() | $206.78B | public | 1886 | Atlanta, US | |
13 | ![]() | $205.3B | public | 1891 | Kenilworth, US | |
14 | ![]() | $187.25B | public | 1977 | Redwood City, US | |
15 | ![]() | $178.41B | public | 1965 | Harrison, US | |
16 | ![]() | $176.5B | public | 1937 | Toyota City, JP | |
17 | ![]() | $172.37B | public | 2008 | Leuven, BE | |
18 | ![]() | $162.82B | public | 1812 | New York, US | |
19 | ![]() | $152.07B | public | 1972 | Newtown Square, US | |
20 | ![]() | $151.86B | public | 1955 | Oak Brook, US | |
21 | ![]() | $144.09B | public | 1924 | Courbevoie, FR | |
22 | ![]() | $136.45B | public | 1982 | San Jose, US | |
23 | ![]() | $134.02B | public | 1972 | Beaverton, US | |
24 | ![]() | $128.89B | public | 1998 | San Jose, US | |
25 | ![]() | $125.9B | public | 1999 | San Francisco, US | |
26 | ![]() | $125.62B | public | 1906 | Morris Plains, US | |
27 | ![]() | $124.97B | public | 2005 | San Jose, US | |
28 | ![]() | $124.47B | public | 1911 | Armonk, US | |
29 | ![]() | $112.42B | public | 1989 | Dublin 4, IE | |
30 | ![]() | $111.36B | public | 1993 | Santa Clara, US | |
31 | ![]() | $108.7B | public | 1930 | Dallas, US | |
32 | ![]() | $108.07B | public | 1985 | San Diego, US | |
33 | ![]() | $97.47B | public | 1873 | London, GB | |
34 | ![]() | $94.55B | public | 1971 | Seattle, US | |
35 | ![]() | $91.57B | public | 1892 | Boston, US | |
36 | ![]() | $83.43B | public | 1998 | Palo Alto, US | |
37 | ![]() | $81.05B | public | 1935 | New York, US | |
38 | ![]() | $78.21B | public | 1925 | Peoria, US | |
39 | ![]() | $76.68B | public | 1887 | New York, US | |
40 | ![]() | $76.11B | public | 1869 | New York, US | |
41 | ![]() | $75.01B | public | 1988 | New York, US | |
42 | ![]() | $72.89B | public | 1802 | Wilmington, US | |
43 | ![]() | $71.29B | public | 1941 | Portage, US | |
44 | ![]() | $69.76B | public | 1949 | Roseland, US | |
45 | ![]() | $66.84B | public | 1832 | Toronto, CA | |
46 | ![]() | $65.87B | public | 1929 | London, GB | |
47 | ![]() | $65.35B | public | 1946 | Tokyo, JP | |
48 | ![]() | $64.37B | public | 1983 | Mountain View, US | |
49 | ![]() | $62.7B | public | 1836 | Rueil-Malmaison, FR | |
50 | ![]() | $61.55B | public | 1806 | New York, US | |
51 | ![]() | $58.64B | public | 1995 | Sunnyvale, US | |
52 | ![]() | $54.84B | public | 1986 | Dublin, IE | |
53 | ![]() | $53.15B | public | 1923 | Naperville, US | |
54 | ![]() | $51.3B | public | 1979 | Marlborough, US | |
55 | ![]() | $50.52B | public | 1817 | Toronto, CA | |
56 | ![]() | $49.81B | public | 2004 | Santa Clara, US | |
57 | ![]() | $47.31B | public | 1907 | Danbury, US | |
58 | ![]() | $46.14B | public | 1940 | Allentown, US | |
59 | ![]() | $45.22B | public | 1981 | Bengaluru, IN | |
60 | ![]() | $45.13B | public | 1868 | New York, US | |
61 | ![]() | $44.77B | public | 2005 | Pleasanton, US | |
62 | ![]() | $43.24B | public | 1988 | Zürich, CH | |
63 | ![]() | $43.22B | public | 1919 | London, GB | |
64 | ![]() | $43.12B | public | 1890 | St. Louis, US | |
65 | ![]() | $41.56B | public | 1993 | Paris, FR | |
66 | ![]() | $40.1B | public | 1998 | Redwood City, US | |
67 | ![]() | $40.09B | public | 1897 | Midland, US | |
68 | ![]() | $39.86B | public | 1857 | Bilbao, ES | |
69 | ![]() | $39.24B | public | 2015 | Chicago, US | |
70 | ![]() | $38.45B | public | 1891 | Amsterdam, NL | |
71 | ![]() | $38.11B | public | 1968 | Jacksonville, US | |
72 | ![]() | $38.06B | public | 1982 | San Rafael, US | |
73 | ![]() | $36.59B | public | 1690 | London, GB | |
74 | ![]() | $36.55B | public | 1909 | New York, US | |
75 | ![]() | $35.56B | public | 1885 | Glendale, US | |
76 | ![]() | $33.73B | public | 1994 | Paris, FR | |
77 | ![]() | $33.51B | public | 1984 | Brookfield, US | |
78 | ![]() | $32.76B | public | 1995 | San Jose, US | |
79 | ![]() | $32.23B | public | 2005 | Houston, US | |
80 | ![]() | $31.82B | public | 1856 | Zurich, CH | |
81 | ![]() | $31.69B | public | 1876 | Stockholm, SE | |
82 | ![]() | $31.11B | public | 1939 | Palo Alto, US | |
83 | ![]() | $30.82B | public | 2006 | Eindhoven, NL | |
84 | ![]() | $30.79B | public | 2008 | Toronto, CA | |
85 | ![]() | $30.71B | public | 2006 | San Francisco, US | |
86 | ![]() | $29.88B | public | 1932 | Wallingford, US | |
87 | ![]() | $29.87B | public | 1846 | London, GB | |
88 | ![]() | $29.0B | public | 1865 | Espoo, FI | |
89 | ![]() | $27.38B | public | 2016 | Durham, US | |
90 | ![]() | $25.58B | public | 2016 | Uxbridge, GB | |
91 | ![]() | $25.12B | public | 1851 | Corning, US | |
92 | ![]() | $25.08B | public | 1792 | Boston, US | |
93 | ![]() | $24.83B | public | 1999 | Santa Clara, US | |
94 | ![]() | $24.6B | public | 2006 | Stockholm, SE | |
95 | ![]() | $23.87B | public | 1989 | Chandler, US | |
96 | ![]() | $23.62B | public | 1928 | Chicago, US | |
97 | ![]() | $23.52B | public | 2005 | Santa Clara, US | |
98 | ![]() | $23.23B | public | 1828 | London, GB | |
99 | ![]() | $23.18B | public | 1946 | Barcelona, ES | |
100 | ![]() | $22.79B | public | 1959 | London, GB |
Market capitalization is taken into account by investors to see the company’s value and its overall market size. Thanks to the list, you are able to compare market cups of the largest companies in France and find the business you would like to cooperate with.
5. The largest companies in France by the number of stores
Another determinant of company position is its number of stores. The first place here is awarded to one of the largest French companies – Sopra Steria. You can connote it with the information technology consulting services, and the number of Sopra Steria stores is 57 places. Are you curious about the rest of the businesses? Check them below:
# | Name | Stores | Type | Founded | Headquarter | Links |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() | 57 | public | 1968 | Paris, FR | |
2 | ![]() | 34 | public | 1997 | Bezons, FR | |
3 | ![]() | 33 | public | 1967 | Paris, FR | |
4 | ![]() | 26 | public | 1976 | Montréal, CA | |
5 | ![]() | 25 | public | 1828 | London, GB | |
6 | ![]() | 18 | public | 1985 | Paris, FR | |
7 | ![]() | 17 | private | 1987 | Amstelveen, NL | |
8 | ![]() | 17 | public | 1988 | Zürich, CH | |
9 | ![]() | 17 | private | 2015 | Paris, FR | |
10 | ![]() | 14 | public | 2005 | Pantin, FR | |
11 | ![]() | 13 | public | 1888 | New York, US | |
12 | ![]() | 12 | public | 1893 | Paris, FR | |
13 | ![]() | 12 | private | 1945 | Paris-16E-Arrondissement, FR | |
14 | ![]() | 12 | public | 1972 | Champfromier, FR | |
15 | ![]() | 11 | public | 1888 | Amsterdam, NL | |
16 | ![]() | 10 | public | 1973 | Paris, FR | |
17 | ![]() | 10 | private | 2012 | Cherbourg, FR | |
18 | ![]() | 9 | public | 1935 | Englewood, US | |
19 | ![]() | 8 | public | 1968 | Santa Clara, US | |
20 | ![]() | 8 | public | 1949 | Roseland, US | |
21 | ![]() | 8 | public | 1981 | Vélizy-Villacoublay, FR | |
22 | ![]() | 8 | public | 1906 | Freienbach, CH | |
23 | ![]() | 8 | public | 1937 | Courbevoie, FR | |
24 | ![]() | 8 | private | 2002 | New York, US | |
25 | ![]() | 7 | public | 1984 | San Jose, US | |
26 | ![]() | 7 | public | 1986 | Mountain View, US | |
27 | ![]() | 7 | public | 1934 | Wimborne, GB | |
28 | ![]() | 7 | public | 1924 | Downers Grove, US | |
29 | ![]() | 7 | public | 1977 | Liberty Lake, US | |
30 | ![]() | 6 | public | 1970 | Leiden, NL | |
31 | ![]() | 6 | public | 1935 | Minato, JP | |
32 | ![]() | 6 | public | 1972 | Newtown Square, US | |
33 | ![]() | 6 | public | 1991 | Paris, FR | |
34 | ![]() | 6 | public | 1953 | Stockholm, SE | |
35 | ![]() | 6 | public | 1917 | Nürnberg, DE | |
36 | ![]() | 6 | public | 1807 | Niederweningen, CH | |
37 | ![]() | 6 | public | 2011 | Schiphol-Rijk, NL | |
38 | ![]() | 6 | public | 1914 | Milwaukee, US | |
39 | ![]() | 6 | private | 1893 | Paris, FR | |
40 | ![]() | 5 | private | 1989 | London, GB | |
41 | ![]() | 5 | public | 1902 | Paris, FR | |
42 | ![]() | 5 | public | 1987 | Plan-les-Ouates, CH | |
43 | ![]() | 5 | public | 1985 | Troy, US | |
44 | ![]() | 5 | public | 1980 | Paris, FR | |
45 | ![]() | 5 | private | 1998 | Arazuri, ES | |
46 | ![]() | 5 | public | 1850 | Christchurch , GB | |
47 | ![]() | 5 | private | 1995 | Nanterre, FR | |
48 | ![]() | 5 | private | 1997 | Rennes, FR | |
49 | ![]() | 5 | public | Villeurbanne, FR | ||
50 | ![]() | 4 | public | 1968 | Mumbai, IN | |
51 | ![]() | 4 | public | 1994 | Paris, FR | |
52 | ![]() | 4 | public | 1994 | Seattle, US | |
53 | ![]() | 4 | public | 2006 | Eindhoven, NL | |
54 | ![]() | 4 | public | 1903 | Milwaukee, US | |
55 | ![]() | 4 | public | 1982 | San Jose, US | |
56 | ![]() | 4 | public | 1976 | West Berkshire, GB | |
57 | ![]() | 4 | public | 1856 | Berkshire, GB | |
58 | ![]() | 4 | public | 1997 | Milpitas, US | |
59 | ![]() | 4 | public | 1975 | Paris-13E-Arrondissement, FR | |
60 | ![]() | 4 | private | 1969 | Hemel Hempstead, GB | |
61 | ![]() | 4 | public | Manitowoc, US | ||
62 | ![]() | 4 | public | 1845 | Hemel Hempstead, GB | |
63 | ![]() | 4 | public | 1954 | Medina, US | |
64 | ![]() | 4 | public | 1777 | Grandvillars, FR | |
65 | ![]() | 4 | public | 1985 | London, GB | |
66 | ![]() | 4 | public | 1990 | Bruxelles, BE | |
67 | ![]() | 4 | public | 1975 | Dierikon, CH | |
68 | ![]() | 4 | subsidiary | 2011 | New York, US | |
69 | ![]() | 4 | private | 2012 | Cesson-Sévigné, FR | |
70 | ![]() | 3 | public | 1911 | Armonk, US | |
71 | ![]() | 3 | public | 1892 | Boston, US | |
72 | ![]() | 3 | public | 1989 | Dublin 4, IE | |
73 | ![]() | 3 | public | 1925 | Peoria, US | |
74 | ![]() | 3 | public | 1836 | Rueil-Malmaison, FR | |
75 | ![]() | 3 | public | 1990 | Los Angeles, US | |
76 | ![]() | 3 | public | 1939 | Palo Alto, US | |
77 | ![]() | 3 | public | 1941 | Portage, US | |
78 | ![]() | 3 | public | 1999 | Neubiberg, DE | |
79 | ![]() | 3 | private | 1926 | New York, US | |
80 | ![]() | 3 | public | 1967 | Evansville, US | |
81 | ![]() | 3 | public | 1998 | Bengaluru, IN | |
82 | ![]() | 3 | public | 1880 | Broomfield, US | |
83 | ![]() | 3 | subsidiary | 2000 | St. Louis, US | |
84 | ![]() | 3 | public | 1877 | Delaware, US | |
85 | ![]() | 3 | public | 1929 | Chicago, US | |
86 | ![]() | 3 | public | 1902 | Clayton, US | |
87 | ![]() | 3 | public | 1988 | San Jose, US | |
88 | ![]() | 3 | subsidiary | 2015 | Berlin, DE | |
89 | ![]() | 3 | public | 1993 | Berwyn, US | |
90 | ![]() | 3 | public | 1948 | Stamford, US | |
91 | ![]() | 3 | subsidiary | 1928 | Fairlawn, US | |
92 | ![]() | 3 | public | 2000 | Sunnyvale, US | |
93 | ![]() | 3 | subsidiary | 2008 | Rueil-Malmaison, FR | |
94 | ![]() | 3 | subsidiary | 1967 | Bellevue, US | |
95 | ![]() | 3 | subsidiary | 1894 | Clichy, FR | |
96 | ![]() | 3 | public | 1966 | Eden Prairie, US | |
97 | ![]() | 3 | public | 1899 | Bergen, NO | |
98 | ![]() | 3 | public | 2005 | Paris, FR | |
99 | ![]() | 3 | public | 1960 | North Reading, US | |
100 | ![]() | 3 | public | 1966 | Billerica, US |
As you can see, the podium is also for Atos and its 34 stores. If we look at this company a bit wider, you should know that Atos provides its digital transformation services in over 73 countries. In our list, literally, just after Atos company, there is a third-place for multinational business handling consulting, technology and outsourcing issues – Capgemini. This company has only one store less, in comparison with Atos.
See also: Top Companies in Canada by Revenue, Market Cap and More
6. The biggest companies in France by employees
As we have mentioned earlier, a number of employees is one of the crucial elements which has an effect on the company market standing. Many large employers are operating in France, but do you know what is the biggest one? With the number of 630600 employees and workplaces all over the world, American technology company Amazon opens the list. Right after it, we can see Danish entity ISS and French food company Sodexo.
# | Name | Employees | Type | Founded | Headquarter | Links |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() | 630600 | public | 1994 | Seattle, US | |
2 | ![]() | 488946 | public | 1901 | Søborg, DK | |
3 | ![]() | 460663 | public | 1966 | Issy-les-Moulineaux, FR | |
4 | ![]() | 459000 | public | 1989 | Dublin 4, IE | |
5 | ![]() | 417929 | public | 1968 | Mumbai, IN | |
6 | ![]() | 410000 | private | 1886 | Gerlingen, DE | |
7 | ![]() | 371796 | public | 1937 | Toyota City, JP | |
8 | ![]() | 358914 | private | 1961 | Croix, FR | |
9 | ![]() | 350600 | public | 1911 | Armonk, US | |
10 | ![]() | 345000 | public | 1934 | Kungsholmen, SE | |
11 | ![]() | 333723 | public | Paris, FR | ||
12 | ![]() | 333722 | public | Paris, FR | ||
13 | ![]() | 323000 | public | 1866 | Vevey, CH | |
14 | ![]() | 320000 | public | 1960 | Ann Arbor, US | |
15 | ![]() | 312373 | public | 1898 | Saint-Étienne, FR | |
16 | ![]() | 305289 | public | 1910 | Tokyo, JP | |
17 | ![]() | 300367 | public | 1886 | Stuttgart, DE | |
18 | ![]() | 300000 | public | 1978 | Paris, FR | |
19 | ![]() | 291000 | public | 1971 | Seattle, US | |
20 | ![]() | 284482 | subsidiary | 1886 | Stuttgart, DE | |
21 | ![]() | 283000 | public | 1892 | Boston, US | |
22 | ![]() | 281600 | public | 1994 | Paris, FR | |
23 | ![]() | 276973 | private | 1989 | London, GB | |
24 | ![]() | 273858 | public | 1918 | Kadoma, JP | |
25 | ![]() | 268000 | public | 1876 | Dallas, US | |
26 | ![]() | 264041 | public | 1806 | Mumbai, IN | |
27 | ![]() | 263900 | private | 1845 | New York, US | |
28 | ![]() | 263000 | public | 1965 | Harrison, US | |
29 | ![]() | 250930 | private | 1998 | London, GB | |
30 | ![]() | 250000 | subsidiary | 1967 | Issy-les-Moulineaux, FR | |
31 | ![]() | 245424 | private | 1991 | Paris-15E-Arrondissement, FR | |
32 | ![]() | 215675 | public | 1995 | Bonn, DE | |
33 | ![]() | 211313 | public | 1967 | Paris, FR | |
34 | ![]() | 211000 | private | 1976 | Paris, FR | |
35 | ![]() | 210000 | public | 1955 | Oak Brook, US | |
36 | ![]() | 205000 | public | 1904 | Charlotte, US | |
37 | ![]() | 204107 | public | 1981 | Bengaluru, IN | |
38 | ![]() | 204000 | public | 1812 | New York, US | |
39 | ![]() | 202624 | public | 2000 | Paris, FR | |
40 | ![]() | 201000 | public | 1923 | Burbank, US | |
41 | ![]() | 200000 | public | 1969 | Singapore, SG | |
42 | ![]() | 197108 | public | 2006 | Luxembourg, LU | |
43 | ![]() | 193279 | private | 1987 | Amstelveen, NL | |
44 | ![]() | 190000 | public | 1899 | Rueil-Malmaison, FR | |
45 | ![]() | 181344 | public | 1898 | Boulogne-Billancourt, FR | |
46 | ![]() | 181001 | public | 1665 | Courbevoie, FR | |
47 | ![]() | 180000 | private | 1987 | Shenzhen, CN | |
48 | ![]() | 174386 | public | 1985 | Arteixo, ES | |
49 | ![]() | 172603 | public | 2008 | Leuven, BE | |
50 | ![]() | 169000 | public | 1853 | Paris, FR | |
51 | ![]() | 163827 | public | 1945 | Bengaluru, IN | |
52 | ![]() | 162208 | public | 1946 | Paris, FR | |
53 | ![]() | 161659 | subsidiary | 1998 | Mountain View, US | |
54 | ![]() | 160566 | public | 1929 | London, GB | |
55 | ![]() | 155000 | private | 1865 | Minneapolis, US | |
56 | ![]() | 153124 | public | 1836 | Rueil-Malmaison, FR | |
57 | ![]() | 153090 | public | 2008 | Courbevoie, FR | |
58 | ![]() | 150000 | public | 2017 | McLean, US | |
59 | ![]() | 149031 | public | 1993 | Paris, FR | |
60 | ![]() | 149022 | public | 1864 | Paris, FR | |
61 | ![]() | 146915 | investor | Paris, FR | ||
62 | ![]() | 146600 | public | 1988 | Zürich, CH | |
63 | ![]() | 142340 | public | 1921 | Tokyo, JP | |
64 | ![]() | 141256 | public | 1875 | Minato-ku, JP | |
65 | ![]() | 140365 | public | 1935 | Minato, JP | |
66 | ![]() | 137000 | public | 1977 | Redwood City, US | |
67 | ![]() | 136633 | public | 1905 | Paris, FR | |
68 | ![]() | 135000 | public | 1969 | San Francisco, US | |
69 | ![]() | 133671 | public | 1970 | Leiden, NL | |
70 | ![]() | 132000 | public | 1991 | Paris, FR | |
71 | ![]() | 131000 | public | 1975 | Redmond, US | |
72 | ![]() | 128637 | public | 1987 | Paris, FR | |
73 | ![]() | 128584 | public | 1999 | Essen, DE | |
74 | ![]() | 125627 | public | 1857 | Bilbao, ES | |
75 | ![]() | 122110 | public | 1997 | Bezons, FR | |
76 | ![]() | 122000 | public | 1885 | Glendale, US | |
77 | ![]() | 121597 | public | 1996 | Basel, CH | |
78 | ![]() | 120081 | public | 1999 | Noida, IN | |
79 | ![]() | 119836 | public | 1952 | Paris, FR | |
80 | ![]() | 118391 | public | 1986 | Pune, IN | |
81 | ![]() | 117300 | public | 1946 | Tokyo, JP | |
82 | ![]() | 115686 | public | 1997 | Nanterre, FR | |
83 | ![]() | 114000 | public | 1906 | Morris Plains, US | |
84 | ![]() | 111588 | public | 1985 | Paris, FR | |
85 | ![]() | 111100 | public | 1889 | Clermont-Ferrand, FR | |
86 | ![]() | 110000 | private | 1978 | Marseille, FR | |
87 | ![]() | 108800 | public | 1968 | Santa Clara, US | |
88 | ![]() | 105800 | public | 1846 | London, GB | |
89 | ![]() | 105783 | public | 1919 | Paris, FR | |
90 | ![]() | 105000 | private | 2009 | Paris, FR | |
91 | ![]() | 104226 | public | 2004 | Paris, FR | |
92 | ![]() | 104000 | public | 1925 | Peoria, US | |
93 | ![]() | 103000 | public | 1865 | Espoo, FI | |
94 | ![]() | 102883 | public | 1935 | Tokyo, JP | |
95 | ![]() | 101550 | public | 1999 | Hangzhou, CN | |
96 | ![]() | 100735 | public | 1876 | Stockholm, SE | |
97 | ![]() | 98508 | public | 1832 | Toronto, CA | |
98 | ![]() | 98000 | public | 1924 | Courbevoie, FR | |
99 | ![]() | 97878 | public | 1936 | Yokohama-shi, JP | |
100 | ![]() | 97368 | public | 1878 | Genève, CH |
What is more, in the profile above, there are pointed such popular brands as Toyota, Starbucks, Mercedes-Benz, Nestle or The Walt Disney Company. Have you found them already?
7. The top companies in France to work for
The last ranking of major French companies is related to the best business to work for. Good working conditions, job security, development opportunities, or pay satisfaction add up to general opinion about the employer. The first place on this list takes SAP company – employees rates work there for 4.5 points. The interesting fact is that in 2013, SAP took the initiative to recruit people with autism and Asperger syndrome. Find out how the workers assess the culture and values there.
# | Name | Votes | Ratings | Culture & values | Work/life balance | Type | Headquarter | Links |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() | 10161 | 4.5 | 4.5 | 4.4 | public | Newtown Square, US | |
2 | ![]() | 8609 | 4.4 | 4.4 | 4.1 | subsidiary | Mountain View, US | |
3 | ![]() | 21925 | 4.1 | 4.0 | 3.9 | public | Redmond, US | |
4 | ![]() | 8044 | 4.1 | 4.2 | 4.2 | public | Espoo, FI | |
5 | ![]() | 16536 | 4.0 | 4.1 | 4.1 | public | San Jose, US | |
6 | ![]() | 4294 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 3.7 | public | London, GB | |
7 | ![]() | 3307 | 3.9 | 3.8 | 3.8 | public | New York, US | |
8 | ![]() | 4405 | 3.9 | 3.9 | 3.8 | public | Rueil-Malmaison, FR | |
9 | ![]() | 42120 | 3.9 | 3.9 | 3.4 | public | Dublin 4, IE | |
10 | ![]() | 12644 | 3.9 | 3.8 | 3.8 | public | Santa Clara, US | |
11 | ![]() | 2048 | 3.9 | 4.2 | 4.0 | public | Palo Alto, US | |
12 | ![]() | 2774 | 3.9 | 3.9 | 3.3 | public | Chicago, US | |
13 | ![]() | 6 | 3.83 | 3.5 | 3.8 | public | Stuttgart, DE | |
14 | ![]() | 21269 | 3.8 | 4.0 | 3.5 | public | Seattle, US | |
15 | ![]() | 1709 | 3.8 | 3.9 | 3.3 | public | Toyota City, JP | |
16 | ![]() | 1236 | 3.8 | 3.7 | 3.7 | public | Courbevoie, FR | |
17 | ![]() | 513 | 3.8 | 3.8 | 3.7 | public | Clermont-Ferrand, FR | |
18 | ![]() | 1422 | 3.8 | 3.7 | 3.5 | public | Düsseldorf, DE | |
19 | ![]() | 27837 | 3.8 | 3.8 | 3.0 | private | New York, US | |
20 | ![]() | 1016 | 3.8 | 3.6 | 4.1 | public | Paris, FR | |
21 | ![]() | 180 | 3.8 | 3.6 | 3.2 | public | Paris, FR | |
22 | ![]() | 2872 | 3.7 | 3.5 | 3.5 | public | Basel, CH | |
23 | ![]() | 10814 | 3.7 | 3.2 | 3.2 | public | Pune, IN | |
24 | ![]() | 36524 | 3.7 | 3.8 | 3.7 | public | Mumbai, IN | |
25 | ![]() | 578 | 3.7 | 3.6 | 3.6 | subsidiary | Stuttgart, DE | |
26 | ![]() | 183 | 3.7 | 3.4 | 3.4 | public | Rueil-Malmaison, FR | |
27 | ![]() | 829 | 3.7 | 3.5 | 3.7 | public | Boulogne-Billancourt, FR | |
28 | ![]() | 7198 | 3.7 | 3.9 | 3.5 | public | New York, US | |
29 | ![]() | 2718 | 3.7 | 3.7 | 3.6 | subsidiary | Miami, US | |
30 | ![]() | 2615 | 3.7 | 3.8 | 3.7 | public | St. Louis, US | |
31 | ![]() | 2947 | 3.7 | 3.7 | 3.3 | public | Vevey, CH | |
32 | ![]() | 792 | 3.6 | 3.7 | 3.8 | public | Pantin, FR | |
33 | ![]() | 2739 | 3.6 | 3.6 | 3.5 | public | Chicago, US | |
34 | ![]() | 4921 | 3.6 | 3.5 | 3.4 | public | Atlanta, US | |
35 | ![]() | 1785 | 3.6 | 3.4 | 3.6 | public | Paris, FR | |
36 | ![]() | 138 | 3.6 | 3.3 | 3.5 | public | Chiyoda-ku, JP | |
37 | ![]() | 434 | 3.6 | 3.4 | 3.3 | public | Paris, FR | |
38 | ![]() | 871 | 3.6 | 3.8 | 3.5 | public | Paris, FR | |
39 | ![]() | 6885 | 3.6 | 3.2 | 3.2 | public | Morris Plains, US | |
40 | ![]() | 944 | 3.6 | 3.6 | 3.5 | public | Singapore, SG | |
41 | ![]() | 44000 | 3.6 | 3.6 | 3.7 | public | Armonk, US | |
42 | ![]() | 463 | 3.6 | 3.5 | 3.7 | public | Bonn, DE | |
43 | ![]() | 28271 | 3.6 | 3.5 | 3.4 | public | Paris, FR | |
44 | ![]() | 21154 | 3.6 | 3.5 | 3.5 | public | Charlotte, US | |
45 | ![]() | 7557 | 3.6 | 3.4 | 3.0 | public | Harrison, US | |
46 | ![]() | 2840 | 3.6 | 3.6 | 3.6 | public | Zürich, CH | |
47 | ![]() | 4258 | 3.5 | 3.7 | 3.7 | public | Amsterdam, NL | |
48 | ![]() | 14418 | 3.5 | 3.5 | 3.3 | public | New York, US | |
49 | ![]() | 8855 | 3.5 | 3.8 | 3.9 | public | Stockholm, SE | |
50 | ![]() | 4605 | 3.5 | 3.6 | 3.6 | public | New York, US | |
51 | ![]() | 791 | 3.5 | 3.1 | 3.4 | public | Montreal, CA | |
52 | ![]() | 1007 | 3.4 | 3.5 | 3.5 | public | Kadoma, JP | |
53 | ![]() | 395 | 3.4 | 3.2 | 3.2 | public | Stockholm, SE | |
54 | ![]() | 252 | 3.4 | 3.4 | 3.2 | private | Marseille, FR | |
55 | ![]() | 6191 | 3.4 | 3.4 | 3.6 | public | Montréal, CA | |
56 | ![]() | 3760 | 3.4 | 3.2 | 3.0 | public | Ann Arbor, US | |
57 | ![]() | 3667 | 3.4 | 3.3 | 3.4 | public | Durham, US | |
58 | ![]() | 730 | 3.4 | 3.1 | 3.5 | public | Courbevoie, FR | |
59 | ![]() | 70 | 3.4 | 3.8 | 3.0 | public | Hangzhou, CN | |
60 | ![]() | 21890 | 3.4 | 3.2 | 3.8 | public | Redwood City, US | |
61 | ![]() | 663 | 3.4 | 3.3 | 3.7 | private | Paris-15E-Arrondissement, FR | |
62 | ![]() | 269 | 3.3 | 3.0 | 3.1 | public | Zürich, CH | |
63 | ![]() | 14470 | 3.3 | 3.3 | 3.3 | public | Paris, FR | |
64 | ![]() | 799 | 3.3 | 3.1 | 3.4 | public | Essen, DE | |
65 | ![]() | 12984 | 3.3 | 3.2 | 3.5 | public | Noida, IN | |
66 | ![]() | 22618 | 3.3 | 3.1 | 3.2 | public | Oak Brook, US | |
67 | ![]() | 890 | 3.3 | 3.2 | 3.2 | public | Paris, FR | |
68 | ![]() | 1000 | 3.3 | 3.1 | 3.0 | public | Akron, US | |
69 | ![]() | 32959 | 3.3 | 3.8 | 3.5 | public | Bengaluru, IN | |
70 | ![]() | 901 | 3.3 | 3.5 | 3.4 | public | Paris, FR | |
71 | ![]() | 1287 | 3.3 | 3.2 | 3.0 | subsidiary | Bonn, DE | |
72 | ![]() | 754 | 3.2 | 3.0 | 2.9 | public | Tokyo, JP | |
73 | ![]() | 113 | 3.2 | 3.1 | 3.2 | public | Nürnberg, DE | |
74 | ![]() | 1625 | 3.2 | 3.3 | 3.6 | public | Paris, FR | |
75 | ![]() | 168 | 3.2 | 3.2 | 3.0 | public | Osaka, JP | |
76 | ![]() | 4499 | 3.2 | 3.0 | 3.4 | public | Bezons, FR | |
77 | ![]() | 3724 | 3.2 | 3.1 | 3.1 | public | Issy-les-Moulineaux, FR | |
78 | ![]() | 19236 | 3.2 | 3.6 | 3.3 | public | Bengaluru, IN | |
79 | ![]() | 107 | 3.2 | 2.5 | 3.2 | public | Saint-Étienne, FR | |
80 | ![]() | 5284 | 3.2 | 3.3 | 3.1 | public | Paris, FR | |
81 | ![]() | 214 | 3.2 | 3.0 | 3.1 | public | Wallingford, US | |
82 | ![]() | 1744 | 3.1 | 2.9 | 3.3 | public | Montréal, CA | |
83 | ![]() | 2939 | 3.1 | 3.0 | 3.0 | public | Glendale, US | |
84 | ![]() | 4443 | 3.1 | 3.0 | 3.3 | public | Los Angeles, US | |
85 | ![]() | 519 | 3.1 | 2.8 | 3.0 | public | Søborg, DK | |
86 | ![]() | 2583 | 3.1 | 3.2 | 3.4 | public | Minato, JP | |
87 | ![]() | 204 | 3.1 | 3.0 | 3.1 | public | Plymouth, US | |
88 | ![]() | 1390 | 3.1 | 3.1 | 2.5 | public | Leuven, BE | |
89 | ![]() | 319 | 3.1 | 2.9 | 2.6 | public | Arteixo, ES | |
90 | ![]() | 742 | 3.1 | 2.7 | 2.9 | subsidiary | Duisburg, DE | |
91 | ![]() | 519 | 3.0 | 2.7 | 2.8 | subsidiary | Redditch, GB | |
92 | ![]() | 888 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 3.2 | public | Genève, CH | |
93 | ![]() | 3072 | 3.0 | 3.4 | 3.7 | public | Paris, FR | |
94 | ![]() | 917 | 2.9 | 2.9 | 3.3 | public | Yokohama-shi, JP | |
95 | ![]() | 100 | 2.9 | 3.0 | 3.2 | public | London, GB | |
96 | ![]() | 1350 | 2.8 | 2.6 | 2.6 | public | Kungsholmen, SE | |
97 | ![]() | 5213 | 2.7 | 2.6 | 3.2 | public | McLean, US | |
98 | ![]() | 3 | 2.2 | 1.4 | 2.0 | investor | Paris, FR | |
99 | ![]() | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | public | Paris, FR | ||
100 | ![]() | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | public | Paris, FR |
Obviously, the culture and values are not the only one aspects which are important for employees. And this is why the voters were asked for rating a balance between work and their private life.
Check out how we get data for our rankings
8. Summary
The huge number of companies in France should not be something shocking for us. This country is constantly growing and provides the right conditions for development. Entrepreneurs from different part of the world are interested in running up a business in France. The formal process of setting up a company is not complicated and does not take so much time. This argument surely speaks in favor of trading right there and stand next to the biggest company in France.
Along with new companies on the market, the specific data has been changing dynamically. Companies hire new employees, expand their brands in different regions, and they are subjected to unforeseen competitors actions. If you care about the up-to-date database where you can find the most important information about the companies (not only from France) – visit the Datantify website and come into contact with proven businesses.

with active e-mails, phone numbers
and more
[…] you could conduct a transaction. No doubt you have heard about more global marketplaces such as Rakuten, eBay, Alibaba, and AliExpress. Using of its services can lead to conquering international markets […]
[…] countries give us an array of possibilities to do. We are able not only to travel abroad but also start an international business. It is a good idea for people who want to expand into global markets, reach a new segment of […]
[…] Read also our previous article:Top 40 companies of ASX by market cap https://datantify.com/knowledge/top-40-companies-of-asx-by-market-cap/ […]
[…] Read also our previous article: TOP 50 Largest Financial Companies in the World in 2020https://datantify.com/knowledge/top-50-largest-financial-companies-in-the-world-in-2020/ […]