Top Companies in Italy by Revenue, Market cap and More [2019 Edition]
The world’s capital of pasta and fast supercars, Italy is the 8th largest economy by the nominal GDP in the world. A country well known for its great cuisine, great sport’s cars like Ferraris or Lamborghinis, their love for racing, and also the world’s famous fashion designers. Italy is a very popular touristic direction too. With a stable market, and nearly every important economical factor growing right now it is a great country to begin a new business or to extend an existing one to. Want to know more about the top companies in Italy right now? Check the rankings below to know which companies are the top in this country.
1. Introduction
Below you can see our detailed list of big Italian companies in general, but we have also divided this ranking into categories such as revenue, number of employees, market capital and more. Companies in these rankings are sorted from first to last and they were prepared to be as easy to use as possible. So don’t wait any longer and check out which companies in Italy are the best ones.
2. Quick Summary
The list presents companies from different industries and does not be surprised if you see the same name in more than one table. We can point giant IT companies in Italy, for example, Google, Amazon or Microsoft. There are also electrical businesses – Schneider Electric or Nokia. And as you can see these companies are not of Italian origin but they’re the biggest companies in Italy. Of course, there are Italian companies here like Leonardo for example, but most of these rankings are occupied by American or Asian companies. Let’s take a look at them.
3. Top companies in Italy by Revenue
In this paragraph, we describe top companies in Italy by revenue. Some of the positions can look strange because they have smaller revenue than the others. It is because what we displaying here is revenue only but the order of this list is determined by revenue, net worth, etc. combined. Let’s take a look at the champions here
# | Name | Revenue | Type | Founded | Headquarter | Links |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() | $311.87B | public | 1907 | Den Haag, NL | |
2 | ![]() | $258.27B | public | 1937 | Wolfsburg, DE | |
3 | ![]() | $232.89B | public | 1994 | Seattle, US | |
4 | ![]() | $183.98B | public | 1886 | Stuttgart, DE | |
5 | ![]() | $170.76B | public | 1876 | Dallas, US | |
6 | ![]() | $148.9B | public | 1985 | Paris, FR | |
7 | ![]() | $124.2B | public | 1899 | London, GB | |
8 | ![]() | $121.61B | public | 1892 | Boston, US | |
9 | ![]() | $110.58B | public | 1904 | Charlotte, US | |
10 | ![]() | $110.36B | public | 1975 | Redmond, US | |
11 | ![]() | $88.26B | public | 1866 | Vevey, CH | |
12 | ![]() | $81.87B | private | 1886 | Gerlingen, DE | |
13 | ![]() | $79.59B | public | 1911 | Armonk, US | |
14 | ![]() | $77.81B | public | 1946 | Tokyo, JP | |
15 | ![]() | $74.99B | subsidiary | 1998 | Mountain View, US | |
16 | ![]() | $72.69B | public | 1918 | Kadoma, JP | |
17 | ![]() | $70.85B | public | 1968 | Santa Clara, US | |
18 | ![]() | $68.96B | public | 1880 | München, DE | |
19 | ![]() | $68.91B | public | 1950 | Chiyoda-ku, JP | |
20 | ![]() | $60.28B | public | 1897 | Midland, US | |
21 | ![]() | $59.11B | public | 1948 | Nagoya, JP | |
22 | ![]() | $58.47B | public | 1939 | Palo Alto, US | |
23 | ![]() | $54.72B | public | 1925 | Peoria, US | |
24 | ![]() | $53.65B | public | 1849 | New York, US | |
25 | ![]() | $51.89B | public | 1958 | Seoul, KR | |
26 | ![]() | $49.33B | public | 1984 | San Jose, US | |
27 | ![]() | $49.27B | public | 1871 | Hannover, DE | |
28 | ![]() | $49.11B | public | 1996 | Basel, CH | |
29 | ![]() | $46.4B | public | 1999 | Essen, DE | |
30 | ![]() | $43.96B | public | 1919 | Tokyo, JP | |
31 | ![]() | $43.03B | subsidiary | 1979 | Irvine, US | |
32 | ![]() | $41.8B | public | 1906 | Morris Plains, US | |
33 | ![]() | $41.6B | public | 1989 | Dublin 4, IE | |
34 | ![]() | $40.9B | public | 1921 | Tokyo, JP | |
35 | ![]() | $39.83B | public | 1977 | Redwood City, US | |
36 | ![]() | $36.68B | public | 1999 | Hangzhou, CN | |
37 | ![]() | $36.41B | public | 1997 | Windsor, GB | |
38 | ![]() | $35.99B | public | 1935 | Minato, JP | |
39 | ![]() | $35.95B | public | 1875 | Minato-ku, JP | |
40 | ![]() | $31.86B | public | 1886 | Atlanta, US | |
41 | ![]() | $31.4B | public | 1885 | Glendale, US | |
42 | ![]() | $30.85B | public | 1939 | Palo Alto, US | |
43 | ![]() | $30.39B | public | 1978 | Boise, US | |
44 | ![]() | $30.09B | public | 1939 | Falls Church, US | |
45 | ![]() | $29.68B | public | 1935 | Englewood, US | |
46 | ![]() | $29.14B | public | 1909 | Clichy, FR | |
47 | ![]() | $28.37B | public | 1985 | Arteixo, ES | |
48 | ![]() | $27.7B | public | 1836 | Rueil-Malmaison, FR | |
49 | ![]() | $26.49B | public | 1996 | Zürich, CH | |
50 | ![]() | $26.27B | public | 1972 | Newtown Square, US | |
51 | ![]() | $26.23B | public | 2015 | Chicago, US | |
52 | ![]() | $25.44B | public | 1969 | Singapore, SG | |
53 | ![]() | $24.7B | subsidiary | 1979 | Hopkinton, US | |
54 | ![]() | $24.59B | public | 1802 | Wilmington, US | |
55 | ![]() | $23.76B | public | 1920 | Herzogenaurach, DE | |
56 | ![]() | $23.52B | public | 1902 | Paris, FR | |
57 | ![]() | $23.31B | public | 1898 | Memphis, US | |
58 | ![]() | $23.17B | public | 1997 | Nanterre, FR | |
59 | ![]() | $22.82B | public | 1955 | Oak Brook, US | |
60 | ![]() | $22.78B | public | 1921 | Tokyo, JP | |
61 | ![]() | $22.42B | public | 1876 | Düsseldorf, DE | |
62 | ![]() | $21.81B | public | 1988 | Irving, US | |
63 | ![]() | $21.04B | public | 1911 | Benton Harbor, US | |
64 | ![]() | $20.86B | public | 1876 | Stockholm, SE | |
65 | ![]() | $20.29B | public | 1891 | Amsterdam, NL | |
66 | ![]() | $20.16B | public | 1990 | Los Angeles, US | |
67 | ![]() | $19.28B | public | 1967 | Tokyo, JP | |
68 | ![]() | $19.16B | public | 1879 | München, DE | |
69 | ![]() | $18.35B | public | 1817 | London, GB | |
70 | ![]() | $17.75B | public | 1893 | Paris, FR | |
71 | ![]() | $17.59B | public | 1968 | Mumbai, IN | |
72 | ![]() | $17.44B | public | 2016 | Plymouth, US | |
73 | ![]() | $16.37B | public | 1823 | Slough, GB | |
74 | ![]() | $16.24B | public | 1942 | Montréal, CA | |
75 | ![]() | $16.12B | public | 1994 | Paris, FR | |
76 | ![]() | $15.78B | public | 1930 | Dallas, US | |
77 | ![]() | $15.7B | public | 1946 | Herzogenaurach, DE | |
78 | ![]() | $15.47B | public | 1898 | Akron, US | |
79 | ![]() | $15.37B | public | 1883 | Pittsburgh, US | |
80 | ![]() | $14.98B | public | 1947 | Dallas, US | |
81 | ![]() | $14.9B | public | 1967 | Paris, FR | |
82 | ![]() | $14.48B | public | 1853 | Tokyo, JP | |
83 | ![]() | $13.6B | public | 1941 | Portage, US | |
84 | ![]() | $13.55B | public | 1983 | Kyoto, JP | |
85 | ![]() | $13.33B | public | 1949 | Roseland, US | |
86 | ![]() | $13.28B | public | 1999 | San Francisco, US | |
87 | ![]() | $13.2B | public | 1932 | Melville, US | |
88 | ![]() | $13.15B | public | 1874 | Essen, DE | |
89 | ![]() | $12.91B | public | 1948 | Roma, IT | |
90 | ![]() | $12.87B | public | 1919 | Stockholm, SE | |
91 | ![]() | $12.65B | public | 1863 | Bruxelles, BE | |
92 | ![]() | $12.56B | subsidiary | 1759 | Redditch, GB | |
93 | ![]() | $12.49B | public | 1944 | Nagaokakyo, JP | |
94 | ![]() | $12.07B | public | 1873 | Nacka, SE | |
95 | ![]() | $11.8B | public | 1981 | Bengaluru, IN | |
96 | ![]() | $11.72B | public | 1993 | Santa Clara, US | |
97 | ![]() | $11.63B | public | 1880 | Broomfield, US | |
98 | ![]() | $11.44B | public | 1907 | Danbury, US | |
99 | ![]() | $11.29B | public | 1851 | Corning, US | |
100 | ![]() | $11.22B | public | 1996 | Bellevue, US |
Just look at the podium of the profile. The third place is occupied by the American company Amazon with its $232.89B of revenue. Second place goes to a German car manufacturer Volkswagen with a result of over $258.27B, and the winner is a British-Dutch leader in a gas and oil industry – Shell. Its score is really impressive and amounts to more than $310B in revenue.
Check out how we get data for our rankings
4. Largest companies in Italy by Market Cap
Market capitalization (known as a “market cap”) is about the absolute market value of the entity’s outstanding shares. It is calculated by multiplying the current stock rate by outstanding shares. In this paragraph, you can see the biggest companies in Italy which has been ranked by its market cap. The top five positions go to known all over the world companies – Microsoft, Amazon, Alibaba, Bank of America and MasterCard
# | Name | Market cap. | Type | Founded | Headquarter | Links |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() | $967.12B | public | 1975 | Redmond, US | |
2 | ![]() | $960.32B | public | 1994 | Seattle, US | |
3 | ![]() | $493.53B | public | 1999 | Hangzhou, CN | |
4 | ![]() | $289.71B | public | 1904 | Charlotte, US | |
5 | ![]() | $253.26B | public | 1966 | Harrison, US | |
6 | ![]() | $241.85B | public | 1984 | San Jose, US | |
7 | ![]() | $229.79B | public | 1849 | New York, US | |
8 | ![]() | $229.31B | public | 1968 | Santa Clara, US | |
9 | ![]() | $224.02B | public | 1876 | Dallas, US | |
10 | ![]() | $206.78B | public | 1886 | Atlanta, US | |
11 | ![]() | $187.25B | public | 1977 | Redwood City, US | |
12 | ![]() | $172.37B | public | 2008 | Leuven, BE | |
13 | ![]() | $162.82B | public | 1812 | New York, US | |
14 | ![]() | $152.07B | public | 1972 | Newtown Square, US | |
15 | ![]() | $151.86B | public | 1955 | Oak Brook, US | |
16 | ![]() | $146.13B | public | 1909 | London, GB | |
17 | ![]() | $136.45B | public | 1982 | San Jose, US | |
18 | ![]() | $128.89B | public | 1998 | San Jose, US | |
19 | ![]() | $125.9B | public | 1999 | San Francisco, US | |
20 | ![]() | $125.62B | public | 1906 | Morris Plains, US | |
21 | ![]() | $124.47B | public | 1911 | Armonk, US | |
22 | ![]() | $112.42B | public | 1989 | Dublin 4, IE | |
23 | ![]() | $111.36B | public | 1993 | Santa Clara, US | |
24 | ![]() | $108.7B | public | 1930 | Dallas, US | |
25 | ![]() | $91.57B | public | 1892 | Boston, US | |
26 | ![]() | $81.05B | public | 1935 | New York, US | |
27 | ![]() | $78.21B | public | 1925 | Peoria, US | |
28 | ![]() | $76.11B | public | 1869 | New York, US | |
29 | ![]() | $75.01B | public | 1988 | New York, US | |
30 | ![]() | $72.89B | public | 1802 | Wilmington, US | |
31 | ![]() | $71.29B | public | 1941 | Portage, US | |
32 | ![]() | $69.76B | public | 1949 | Roseland, US | |
33 | ![]() | $65.87B | public | 1929 | London, GB | |
34 | ![]() | $65.35B | public | 1946 | Tokyo, JP | |
35 | ![]() | $62.7B | public | 1836 | Rueil-Malmaison, FR | |
36 | ![]() | $61.55B | public | 1806 | New York, US | |
37 | ![]() | $54.84B | public | 1986 | Dublin, IE | |
38 | ![]() | $53.15B | public | 1923 | Naperville, US | |
39 | ![]() | $49.81B | public | 2004 | Santa Clara, US | |
40 | ![]() | $49.23B | public | 1939 | Falls Church, US | |
41 | ![]() | $47.31B | public | 1907 | Danbury, US | |
42 | ![]() | $46.62B | public | 1978 | Boise, US | |
43 | ![]() | $46.14B | public | 1940 | Allentown, US | |
44 | ![]() | $45.22B | public | 1981 | Bengaluru, IN | |
45 | ![]() | $45.13B | public | 1868 | New York, US | |
46 | ![]() | $44.77B | public | 2005 | Pleasanton, US | |
47 | ![]() | $43.24B | public | 1988 | Zürich, CH | |
48 | ![]() | $43.22B | public | 1919 | London, GB | |
49 | ![]() | $40.1B | public | 1998 | Redwood City, US | |
50 | ![]() | $40.09B | public | 1897 | Midland, US | |
51 | ![]() | $39.86B | public | 1857 | Bilbao, ES | |
52 | ![]() | $39.24B | public | 2015 | Chicago, US | |
53 | ![]() | $38.45B | public | 1891 | Amsterdam, NL | |
54 | ![]() | $38.11B | public | 1968 | Jacksonville, US | |
55 | ![]() | $38.06B | public | 1982 | San Rafael, US | |
56 | ![]() | $36.59B | public | 1690 | London, GB | |
57 | ![]() | $36.55B | public | 1909 | New York, US | |
58 | ![]() | $35.56B | public | 1885 | Glendale, US | |
59 | ![]() | $33.73B | public | 1994 | Paris, FR | |
60 | ![]() | $32.79B | public | 1947 | Maranello, IT | |
61 | ![]() | $32.76B | public | 1995 | San Jose, US | |
62 | ![]() | $32.23B | public | 2005 | Houston, US | |
63 | ![]() | $31.69B | public | 1876 | Stockholm, SE | |
64 | ![]() | $31.11B | public | 1939 | Palo Alto, US | |
65 | ![]() | $30.82B | public | 2006 | Eindhoven, NL | |
66 | ![]() | $30.79B | public | 2008 | Toronto, CA | |
67 | ![]() | $29.88B | public | 1932 | Wallingford, US | |
68 | ![]() | $29.87B | public | 1846 | London, GB | |
69 | ![]() | $29.0B | public | 1865 | Espoo, FI | |
70 | ![]() | $27.45B | public | 1883 | Pittsburgh, US | |
71 | ![]() | $27.38B | public | 2016 | Durham, US | |
72 | ![]() | $25.12B | public | 1851 | Corning, US | |
73 | ![]() | $25.08B | public | 1792 | Boston, US | |
74 | ![]() | $24.83B | public | 1999 | Santa Clara, US | |
75 | ![]() | $24.6B | public | 2006 | Stockholm, SE | |
76 | ![]() | $23.87B | public | 1989 | Chandler, US | |
77 | ![]() | $23.62B | public | 1928 | Chicago, US | |
78 | ![]() | $23.52B | public | 2005 | Santa Clara, US | |
79 | ![]() | $23.23B | public | 1828 | London, GB | |
80 | ![]() | $22.79B | public | 1959 | London, GB | |
81 | ![]() | $21.83B | public | 1939 | Palo Alto, US | |
82 | ![]() | $21.03B | public | 1997 | Milpitas, US | |
83 | ![]() | $20.98B | public | 1895 | Melbourne, US | |
84 | ![]() | $20.29B | public | 1967 | Winona, US | |
85 | ![]() | $20.05B | public | 1880 | Broomfield, US | |
86 | ![]() | $19.87B | public | 1930 | Berwyn, US | |
87 | ![]() | $19.67B | public | 1988 | San Jose, US | |
88 | ![]() | $18.94B | public | 1989 | Columbus, US | |
89 | ![]() | $18.91B | public | 1996 | Bellevue, US | |
90 | ![]() | $18.74B | public | 1969 | New York, US | |
91 | ![]() | $18.69B | public | 1898 | Memphis, US | |
92 | ![]() | $18.43B | public | 1993 | San Carlos, US | |
93 | ![]() | $18.28B | public | 1997 | New York, US | |
94 | ![]() | $17.97B | public | 1986 | Mountain View, US | |
95 | ![]() | $17.81B | public | 1991 | Talleyville, US | |
96 | ![]() | $17.66B | public | 1976 | Montréal, CA | |
97 | ![]() | $17.42B | public | 1906 | Los Angeles, US | |
98 | ![]() | $16.42B | public | 2014 | Santa Rosa, US | |
99 | ![]() | $16.42B | public | 1987 | Plan-les-Ouates, CH | |
100 | ![]() | $16.16B | public | 1970 | Canonsburg, US |
Market capitalization is taken into account by investors to see the company’s value and its overall market size. Thanks to the list, you are able to compare market cups of the largest companies in Italy and find the business you would like to cooperate with.
5. Top companies in Italy by number of stores
This part of the article is dedicated to the largest companies in Italy by a number of stores. Before you look at the created list, we would lift the veil of secrecy and present you some positions you can find there. First of all, there are some Italian corporations. For instance, Leonardo, Fincantieri or Hera Group. Naturally, you will also find multinational companies, such as KPMG or Deloitte. If you want to know how many stores they have there, the list below dispels all doubts:
See also: Top Companies in Brazil by Revenue, Market Cap and More
# | Name | Stores | Type | Founded | Headquarter | Links |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() | 40 | public | 1948 | Roma, IT | |
2 | ![]() | 30 | private | 1987 | Amstelveen, NL | |
3 | ![]() | 26 | private | 1845 | New York, US | |
4 | ![]() | 25 | public | 1919 | London, GB | |
5 | ![]() | 23 | public | 1988 | Zürich, CH | |
6 | ![]() | 12 | public | 1959 | Trieste, IT | |
7 | ![]() | 11 | public | 1906 | Freienbach, CH | |
8 | ![]() | 11 | private | 2005 | Woburn, GB | |
9 | ![]() | 10 | public | 1967 | Paris, FR | |
10 | ![]() | 9 | public | 1985 | Paris, FR | |
11 | ![]() | 9 | public | 1828 | London, GB | |
12 | ![]() | 9 | public | 2002 | Bologna, IT | |
13 | ![]() | 8 | public | 1935 | Englewood, US | |
14 | ![]() | 8 | public | 1919 | Mayfield Heights, US | |
15 | ![]() | 8 | private | 1985 | Milano, IT | |
16 | ![]() | 7 | public | 1968 | Santa Clara, US | |
17 | ![]() | 7 | subsidiary | 1976 | London, GB | |
18 | ![]() | 6 | public | 1865 | Espoo, FI | |
19 | ![]() | 6 | private | 1991 | Fiume Veneto, IT | |
20 | ![]() | 6 | public | 1898 | Roma, IT | |
21 | ![]() | 5 | public | 1925 | Peoria, US | |
22 | ![]() | 5 | public | 1949 | Roseland, US | |
23 | ![]() | 5 | public | 1968 | Paris, FR | |
24 | ![]() | 5 | public | 1907 | Danbury, US | |
25 | ![]() | 5 | public | 1978 | Boise, US | |
26 | ![]() | 5 | public | 1905 | Reggio Emilia, IT | |
27 | ![]() | 5 | public | 2005 | Paris, FR | |
28 | ![]() | 4 | private | 1998 | London, GB | |
29 | ![]() | 4 | public | 1997 | Bezons, FR | |
30 | ![]() | 4 | public | 1906 | Los Angeles, US | |
31 | ![]() | 4 | public | 1884 | Atlanta, US | |
32 | ![]() | 4 | public | 1953 | Roma, IT | |
33 | ![]() | 4 | private | 1966 | Kansas City, US | |
34 | ![]() | 4 | private | 1969 | Hemel Hempstead, GB | |
35 | ![]() | 4 | subsidiary | 1932 | New York, US | |
36 | ![]() | 4 | public | 1985 | Troy, US | |
37 | ![]() | 4 | private | 2004 | Fiumicino, IT | |
38 | ![]() | 4 | public | 2011 | Malmö, SE | |
39 | ![]() | 4 | public | 1967 | Winona, US | |
40 | ![]() | 4 | private | 1919 | Gallarate, IT | |
41 | ![]() | 4 | subsidiary | 2009 | Genova, IT | |
42 | ![]() | 4 | private | 2013 | San Francisco, US | |
43 | ![]() | 4 | private | 1982 | Borgo Valsugana, IT | |
44 | ![]() | 3 | public | 1994 | Seattle, US | |
45 | ![]() | 3 | public | 1989 | Dublin 4, IE | |
46 | ![]() | 3 | public | 1977 | Redwood City, US | |
47 | ![]() | 3 | public | 1942 | Montréal, CA | |
48 | ![]() | 3 | public | 1893 | Paris, FR | |
49 | ![]() | 3 | public | 1876 | Düsseldorf, DE | |
50 | ![]() | 3 | public | 1907 | Den Haag, NL | |
51 | ![]() | 3 | public | 1987 | Plan-les-Ouates, CH | |
52 | ![]() | 3 | subsidiary | 2000 | Frankfurt, DE | |
53 | ![]() | 3 | public | 1792 | Boston, US | |
54 | ![]() | 3 | public | 1999 | Neubiberg, DE | |
55 | ![]() | 3 | private | 1983 | Johannesburg, ZA | |
56 | ![]() | 3 | private | 1965 | Cambridge, US | |
57 | ![]() | 3 | public | 2005 | Houston, US | |
58 | ![]() | 3 | public | 1978 | Adelaide, AU | |
59 | ![]() | 3 | public | 1981 | Vélizy-Villacoublay, FR | |
60 | ![]() | 3 | subsidiary | 1993 | Raleigh, US | |
61 | ![]() | 3 | public | 1951 | East Aurora, US | |
62 | ![]() | 3 | private | 2005 | London, GB | |
63 | ![]() | 3 | public | 1856 | Berkshire, GB | |
64 | ![]() | 3 | public | 1924 | Downers Grove, US | |
65 | ![]() | 3 | public | 1997 | Milpitas, US | |
66 | ![]() | 3 | public | 1975 | Paris-13E-Arrondissement, FR | |
67 | ![]() | 3 | public | 2001 | Stockholm, SE | |
68 | ![]() | 3 | public | 1985 | Needham, US | |
69 | ![]() | 3 | public | 1984 | Westford, US | |
70 | ![]() | 3 | private | 1983 | Greater London, GB | |
71 | ![]() | 3 | public | 1971 | København, DK | |
72 | ![]() | 3 | public | 1994 | London, GB | |
73 | ![]() | 3 | public | 2015 | Milpitas, US | |
74 | ![]() | 3 | private | 1930 | Waalwijk, NL | |
75 | ![]() | 3 | public | 1974 | Milano, IT | |
76 | ![]() | 3 | public | 1989 | Roma, IT | |
77 | ![]() | 3 | public | 1998 | Trieste, IT | |
78 | ![]() | 3 | public | 2001 | Santa Clara, US | |
79 | ![]() | 3 | public | 1985 | Milano, IT | |
80 | ![]() | 3 | private | 1990 | Novara, IT | |
81 | ![]() | 3 | public | 2011 | Milano, IT | |
82 | ![]() | 3 | public | 2008 | Milano, IT | |
83 | ![]() | 3 | private | 2013 | Napoli, IT | |
84 | ![]() | 3 | subsidiary | 2002 | Genova, IT | |
85 | ![]() | 3 | private | 1946 | Acerra, IT | |
86 | ![]() | 3 | private | 2002 | Menlo Park, US | |
87 | ![]() | 2 | public | 1876 | Dallas, US | |
88 | ![]() | 2 | public | 1911 | Armonk, US | |
89 | ![]() | 2 | public | 1975 | Redmond, US | |
90 | ![]() | 2 | private | 1987 | Shenzhen, CN | |
91 | ![]() | 2 | public | 1899 | London, GB | |
92 | ![]() | 2 | public | 1999 | Noida, IN | |
93 | ![]() | 2 | public | 1935 | Minato, JP | |
94 | ![]() | 2 | public | 2016 | Plymouth, US | |
95 | ![]() | 2 | public | 1972 | Newtown Square, US | |
96 | ![]() | 2 | public | 1947 | Dallas, US | |
97 | ![]() | 2 | public | 1984 | San Jose, US | |
98 | ![]() | 2 | public | 1939 | Palo Alto, US | |
99 | ![]() | 2 | public | 2007 | Torino, IT | |
100 | ![]() | 2 | public | 1917 | Nürnberg, DE |
6. Best companies in Italy by Number of employees
Companies aim to reach new market segments and expand their activities to new services and products. They build new factories and open further offices. All of these operations need the labor force, so with the growth of a business, companies hire new employees. They get different positions – from the CEOs to part-time workers. So, let’s take a closer look at them. Not at an individual employee naturally, but at companies in Sweden with the highest number of employees.
# | Name | Employees | Type | Founded | Headquarter | Links |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() | 632312 | public | 1937 | Wolfsburg, DE | |
2 | ![]() | 630600 | public | 1994 | Seattle, US | |
3 | ![]() | 600000 | public | 1941 | Surrey, GB | |
4 | ![]() | 488946 | public | 1901 | Søborg, DK | |
5 | ![]() | 459000 | public | 1989 | Dublin 4, IE | |
6 | ![]() | 417929 | public | 1968 | Mumbai, IN | |
7 | ![]() | 410000 | private | 1886 | Gerlingen, DE | |
8 | ![]() | 350600 | public | 1911 | Armonk, US | |
9 | ![]() | 323000 | public | 1866 | Vevey, CH | |
10 | ![]() | 320000 | public | 1960 | Ann Arbor, US | |
11 | ![]() | 303247 | public | 1927 | Torino, IT | |
12 | ![]() | 300367 | public | 1886 | Stuttgart, DE | |
13 | ![]() | 283000 | public | 1892 | Boston, US | |
14 | ![]() | 281600 | public | 1994 | Paris, FR | |
15 | ![]() | 276973 | private | 1989 | London, GB | |
16 | ![]() | 273858 | public | 1918 | Kadoma, JP | |
17 | ![]() | 268000 | public | 1876 | Dallas, US | |
18 | ![]() | 263900 | private | 1845 | New York, US | |
19 | ![]() | 250930 | private | 1998 | London, GB | |
20 | ![]() | 244582 | public | 1871 | Hannover, DE | |
21 | ![]() | 235915 | public | 1899 | London, GB | |
22 | ![]() | 211313 | public | 1967 | Paris, FR | |
23 | ![]() | 210000 | public | 1955 | Oak Brook, US | |
24 | ![]() | 205000 | public | 1904 | Charlotte, US | |
25 | ![]() | 204107 | public | 1981 | Bengaluru, IN | |
26 | ![]() | 204000 | public | 1812 | New York, US | |
27 | ![]() | 200000 | public | 1969 | Singapore, SG | |
28 | ![]() | 193279 | private | 1987 | Amstelveen, NL | |
29 | ![]() | 180000 | private | 1987 | Shenzhen, CN | |
30 | ![]() | 174386 | public | 1985 | Arteixo, ES | |
31 | ![]() | 172603 | public | 2008 | Leuven, BE | |
32 | ![]() | 161659 | subsidiary | 1998 | Mountain View, US | |
33 | ![]() | 160566 | public | 1929 | London, GB | |
34 | ![]() | 155000 | private | 1865 | Minneapolis, US | |
35 | ![]() | 153124 | public | 1836 | Rueil-Malmaison, FR | |
36 | ![]() | 146600 | public | 1988 | Zürich, CH | |
37 | ![]() | 142340 | public | 1921 | Tokyo, JP | |
38 | ![]() | 141256 | public | 1875 | Minato-ku, JP | |
39 | ![]() | 140365 | public | 1935 | Minato, JP | |
40 | ![]() | 137000 | public | 1977 | Redwood City, US | |
41 | ![]() | 131000 | public | 1975 | Redmond, US | |
42 | ![]() | 128584 | public | 1999 | Essen, DE | |
43 | ![]() | 127431 | public | 1862 | Roma, IT | |
44 | ![]() | 125627 | public | 1857 | Bilbao, ES | |
45 | ![]() | 122110 | public | 1997 | Bezons, FR | |
46 | ![]() | 122000 | public | 1885 | Glendale, US | |
47 | ![]() | 121597 | public | 1996 | Basel, CH | |
48 | ![]() | 120081 | public | 1999 | Noida, IN | |
49 | ![]() | 118391 | public | 1986 | Pune, IN | |
50 | ![]() | 118006 | public | 1967 | Tokyo, JP | |
51 | ![]() | 117300 | public | 1946 | Tokyo, JP | |
52 | ![]() | 115686 | public | 1997 | Nanterre, FR | |
53 | ![]() | 114000 | public | 1906 | Morris Plains, US | |
54 | ![]() | 111588 | public | 1985 | Paris, FR | |
55 | ![]() | 111100 | public | 1889 | Clermont-Ferrand, FR | |
56 | ![]() | 108800 | public | 1968 | Santa Clara, US | |
57 | ![]() | 107554 | public | 1983 | Kyoto, JP | |
58 | ![]() | 105800 | public | 1846 | London, GB | |
59 | ![]() | 104000 | public | 1925 | Peoria, US | |
60 | ![]() | 103000 | public | 1865 | Espoo, FI | |
61 | ![]() | 101550 | public | 1999 | Hangzhou, CN | |
62 | ![]() | 100735 | public | 1876 | Stockholm, SE | |
63 | ![]() | 97878 | public | 1936 | Yokohama-shi, JP | |
64 | ![]() | 97368 | public | 1878 | Genève, CH | |
65 | ![]() | 96498 | public | 1972 | Newtown Square, US | |
66 | ![]() | 93354 | public | 2007 | Torino, IT | |
67 | ![]() | 92836 | public | 1946 | Herzogenaurach, DE | |
68 | ![]() | 92000 | public | 1911 | Benton Harbor, US | |
69 | ![]() | 90200 | public | 1849 | New York, US | |
70 | ![]() | 90147 | public | 1917 | Nürnberg, DE | |
71 | ![]() | 90000 | public | 1783 | Chicago, US | |
72 | ![]() | 87000 | public | 1990 | Los Angeles, US | |
73 | ![]() | 86786 | public | Milano, IT | ||
74 | ![]() | 85000 | public | 2016 | Plymouth, US | |
75 | ![]() | 85000 | public | 1939 | Falls Church, US | |
76 | ![]() | 83500 | public | 1690 | London, GB | |
77 | ![]() | 82606 | public | 1909 | Clichy, FR | |
78 | ![]() | 82000 | public | 1907 | Den Haag, NL | |
79 | ![]() | 81000 | public | 2015 | Zürich, CH | |
80 | ![]() | 80000 | public | 1906 | Los Angeles, US | |
81 | ![]() | 77739 | public | 1934 | Tokyo, JP | |
82 | ![]() | 77400 | public | 1891 | Amsterdam, NL | |
83 | ![]() | 77164 | public | 1950 | Chiyoda-ku, JP | |
84 | ![]() | 75326 | public | 1944 | Nagaokakyo, JP | |
85 | ![]() | 75000 | subsidiary | 1985 | Miami, US | |
86 | ![]() | 74570 | public | 1984 | Qingdao, CN | |
87 | ![]() | 74400 | public | 1947 | Dallas, US | |
88 | ![]() | 74200 | public | 1984 | San Jose, US | |
89 | ![]() | 74000 | public | 1976 | Montréal, CA | |
90 | ![]() | 73773 | public | 1958 | Seoul, KR | |
91 | ![]() | 73600 | public | 1932 | Wallingford, US | |
92 | ![]() | 73066 | public | 1831 | Trieste, IT | |
93 | ![]() | 72904 | public | 1835 | Wien, AT | |
94 | ![]() | 72709 | subsidiary | 1979 | Hopkinton, US | |
95 | ![]() | 70263 | public | 1924 | Osaka, JP | |
96 | ![]() | 69700 | public | 1909 | London, GB | |
97 | ![]() | 68388 | subsidiary | 1947 | Duisburg, DE | |
98 | ![]() | 66000 | public | 1893 | Paris, FR | |
99 | ![]() | 65000 | public | 1902 | Paris, FR | |
100 | ![]() | 64010 | public | 1942 | Montréal, CA |
Are you surprised that Volkswagen gets the best position here? Over 630000 people are joined to the Volkswagen team right now. They have various jobs and the perspective to be promoted in time. Their experience, knowledge, and commitment to work have a direct impact on the career path. What is more, this multinational automotive giant is still developing, and hence, the number of employees would be much higher.
7. Best companies to work for in Italy
Employees are the most valuable assets of every company. When they are satisfied with their jobs, it would surely affect positively on the organization. They would be more motivated, and consequently, more productive. This also leads to strengthening employee loyalty, which lets the company build a successful stable work team. Work conditions are the thing we want to focus on our last list and point the best places to work in India:
# | Name | Votes | Ratings | Culture & values | Work/life balance | Type | Headquarter | Links |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() | 10161 | 4.5 | 4.5 | 4.4 | public | Newtown Square, US | |
2 | ![]() | 8609 | 4.4 | 4.4 | 4.1 | subsidiary | Mountain View, US | |
3 | ![]() | 4965 | 4.4 | 4.6 | 4.2 | public | San Francisco, US | |
4 | ![]() | 8044 | 4.1 | 4.2 | 4.2 | public | Espoo, FI | |
5 | ![]() | 21925 | 4.1 | 4.0 | 3.9 | public | Redmond, US | |
6 | ![]() | 4294 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 3.7 | public | London, GB | |
7 | ![]() | 16536 | 4.0 | 4.1 | 4.1 | public | San Jose, US | |
8 | ![]() | 42120 | 3.9 | 3.9 | 3.4 | public | Dublin 4, IE | |
9 | ![]() | 4405 | 3.9 | 3.9 | 3.8 | public | Rueil-Malmaison, FR | |
10 | ![]() | 4365 | 3.9 | 3.8 | 3.8 | public | Den Haag, NL | |
11 | ![]() | 3307 | 3.9 | 3.8 | 3.8 | public | New York, US | |
12 | ![]() | 2048 | 3.9 | 4.2 | 4.0 | public | Palo Alto, US | |
13 | ![]() | 12644 | 3.9 | 3.8 | 3.8 | public | Santa Clara, US | |
14 | ![]() | 6 | 3.84 | 3.5 | 3.8 | public | Stuttgart, DE | |
15 | ![]() | 27837 | 3.8 | 3.8 | 3.0 | private | New York, US | |
16 | ![]() | 1827 | 3.8 | 3.9 | 3.7 | public | Benton Harbor, US | |
17 | ![]() | 513 | 3.8 | 3.8 | 3.7 | public | Clermont-Ferrand, FR | |
18 | ![]() | 65 | 3.8 | 3.1 | 3.0 | public | Wien, AT | |
19 | ![]() | 1422 | 3.8 | 3.7 | 3.5 | public | Düsseldorf, DE | |
20 | ![]() | 6 | 3.76 | 3.8 | 3.3 | public | Torino, IT | |
21 | ![]() | 10814 | 3.7 | 3.2 | 3.2 | public | Pune, IN | |
22 | ![]() | 2872 | 3.7 | 3.5 | 3.5 | public | Basel, CH | |
23 | ![]() | 2947 | 3.7 | 3.7 | 3.3 | public | Vevey, CH | |
24 | ![]() | 7198 | 3.7 | 3.9 | 3.5 | public | New York, US | |
25 | ![]() | 2121 | 3.7 | 3.7 | 3.2 | private | Chicago, US | |
26 | ![]() | 1690 | 3.7 | 3.8 | 3.7 | public | Midland, US | |
27 | ![]() | 3224 | 3.7 | 3.6 | 3.5 | public | Los Angeles, US | |
28 | ![]() | 378 | 3.7 | 3.6 | 3.4 | public | Espoo, FI | |
29 | ![]() | 1299 | 3.7 | 3.7 | 4.0 | public | Plan-les-Ouates, CH | |
30 | ![]() | 4760 | 3.7 | 3.6 | 3.8 | public | Falls Church, US | |
31 | ![]() | 2718 | 3.7 | 3.7 | 3.6 | subsidiary | Miami, US | |
32 | ![]() | 36524 | 3.7 | 3.8 | 3.7 | public | Mumbai, IN | |
33 | ![]() | 4921 | 3.6 | 3.5 | 3.4 | public | Atlanta, US | |
34 | ![]() | 28271 | 3.6 | 3.5 | 3.4 | public | Paris, FR | |
35 | ![]() | 2840 | 3.6 | 3.6 | 3.6 | public | Zürich, CH | |
36 | ![]() | 944 | 3.6 | 3.6 | 3.5 | public | Singapore, SG | |
37 | ![]() | 21154 | 3.6 | 3.5 | 3.5 | public | Charlotte, US | |
38 | ![]() | 44000 | 3.6 | 3.6 | 3.7 | public | Armonk, US | |
39 | ![]() | 2739 | 3.6 | 3.6 | 3.5 | public | Chicago, US | |
40 | ![]() | 138 | 3.6 | 3.3 | 3.5 | public | Chiyoda-ku, JP | |
41 | ![]() | 3059 | 3.6 | 3.5 | 3.6 | public | London, GB | |
42 | ![]() | 29 | 3.6 | 3.5 | 3.9 | public | Nagaokakyo, JP | |
43 | ![]() | 6885 | 3.6 | 3.2 | 3.2 | public | Morris Plains, US | |
44 | ![]() | 1785 | 3.6 | 3.4 | 3.6 | public | Paris, FR | |
45 | ![]() | 787 | 3.6 | 3.7 | 3.7 | public | Corning, US | |
46 | ![]() | 182 | 3.5 | 3.0 | 3.0 | public | Kyoto, JP | |
47 | ![]() | 8967 | 3.5 | 3.5 | 3.7 | public | Palo Alto, US | |
48 | ![]() | 4430 | 3.5 | 3.7 | 3.4 | public | New York, US | |
49 | ![]() | 14418 | 3.5 | 3.5 | 3.3 | public | New York, US | |
50 | ![]() | 2679 | 3.5 | 3.5 | 3.5 | public | Dallas, US | |
51 | ![]() | 4258 | 3.5 | 3.7 | 3.7 | public | Amsterdam, NL | |
52 | ![]() | 26 | 3.5 | 3.2 | 3.1 | public | Qingdao, CN | |
53 | ![]() | 80 | 3.5 | 3.2 | 3.0 | public | Linz, AT | |
54 | ![]() | 8855 | 3.5 | 3.8 | 3.9 | public | Stockholm, SE | |
55 | ![]() | 846 | 3.4 | 3.3 | 2.8 | public | Memphis, US | |
56 | ![]() | 395 | 3.4 | 3.2 | 3.2 | public | Stockholm, SE | |
57 | ![]() | 21890 | 3.4 | 3.2 | 3.8 | public | Redwood City, US | |
58 | ![]() | 3667 | 3.4 | 3.3 | 3.4 | public | Durham, US | |
59 | ![]() | 1007 | 3.4 | 3.5 | 3.5 | public | Kadoma, JP | |
60 | ![]() | 6191 | 3.4 | 3.4 | 3.6 | public | Montréal, CA | |
61 | ![]() | 70 | 3.4 | 3.8 | 3.0 | public | Hangzhou, CN | |
62 | ![]() | 3760 | 3.4 | 3.2 | 3.0 | public | Ann Arbor, US | |
63 | ![]() | 2698 | 3.3 | 3.2 | 3.4 | public | Jacksonville, US | |
64 | ![]() | 718 | 3.3 | 3.3 | 3.7 | public | Milano, IT | |
65 | ![]() | 3221 | 3.3 | 3.3 | 3.5 | public | New York, US | |
66 | ![]() | 14470 | 3.3 | 3.3 | 3.3 | public | Paris, FR | |
67 | ![]() | 32959 | 3.3 | 3.8 | 3.5 | public | Bengaluru, IN | |
68 | ![]() | 91 | 3.3 | 3.0 | 3.3 | public | Kyoto, JP | |
69 | ![]() | 3384 | 3.3 | 3.8 | 3.4 | private | Delft, NL | |
70 | ![]() | 12984 | 3.3 | 3.2 | 3.5 | public | Noida, IN | |
71 | ![]() | 1537 | 3.3 | 3.5 | 3.1 | public | Naperville, US | |
72 | ![]() | 311 | 3.3 | 3.2 | 3.5 | public | Trieste, IT | |
73 | ![]() | 799 | 3.3 | 3.1 | 3.4 | public | Essen, DE | |
74 | ![]() | 22618 | 3.3 | 3.1 | 3.2 | public | Oak Brook, US | |
75 | ![]() | 1375 | 3.3 | 3.1 | 3.2 | public | Surrey, GB | |
76 | ![]() | 799 | 3.3 | 3.0 | 3.1 | public | München, DE | |
77 | ![]() | 269 | 3.3 | 3.0 | 3.1 | public | Zürich, CH | |
78 | ![]() | 901 | 3.3 | 3.5 | 3.4 | public | Paris, FR | |
79 | ![]() | 1000 | 3.3 | 3.1 | 3.0 | public | Akron, US | |
80 | ![]() | 214 | 3.2 | 3.0 | 3.1 | public | Wallingford, US | |
81 | ![]() | 1625 | 3.2 | 3.3 | 3.6 | public | Paris, FR | |
82 | ![]() | 168 | 3.2 | 3.2 | 3.0 | public | Osaka, JP | |
83 | ![]() | 4499 | 3.2 | 3.0 | 3.4 | public | Bezons, FR | |
84 | ![]() | 113 | 3.2 | 3.1 | 3.2 | public | Nürnberg, DE | |
85 | ![]() | 2354 | 3.2 | 2.8 | 2.8 | public | London, GB | |
86 | ![]() | 1272 | 3.2 | 2.9 | 2.8 | public | Seoul, KR | |
87 | ![]() | 1744 | 3.1 | 2.9 | 3.3 | public | Montréal, CA | |
88 | ![]() | 519 | 3.1 | 2.8 | 3.0 | public | Søborg, DK | |
89 | ![]() | 1390 | 3.1 | 3.1 | 2.5 | public | Leuven, BE | |
90 | ![]() | 2939 | 3.1 | 3.0 | 3.0 | public | Glendale, US | |
91 | ![]() | 742 | 3.1 | 2.7 | 2.9 | subsidiary | Duisburg, DE | |
92 | ![]() | 2583 | 3.1 | 3.2 | 3.4 | public | Minato, JP | |
93 | ![]() | 319 | 3.1 | 2.9 | 2.6 | public | Arteixo, ES | |
94 | ![]() | 4443 | 3.1 | 3.0 | 3.3 | public | Los Angeles, US | |
95 | ![]() | 204 | 3.1 | 3.0 | 3.1 | public | Plymouth, US | |
96 | ![]() | 519 | 3.0 | 2.7 | 2.8 | subsidiary | Redditch, GB | |
97 | ![]() | 888 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 3.2 | public | Genève, CH | |
98 | ![]() | 917 | 2.9 | 2.9 | 3.3 | public | Yokohama-shi, JP | |
99 | ![]() | 32 | 2.72 | 2.3 | 3.5 | public | Roma, IT | |
100 | ![]() | 157 | 2.41 | 2.4 | 2.7 | public | Nagoya, JP |
In the light of employee ratings, the SAP company is the winner here. They have regard to the culture and value issues and consider the balance between work and private life. In the second place, you can see Google with a general rate of 4.4 points. The podium is closed with Salesforce and its 4.4 ratings.
Learn more about our ranking using policy
8. Summary
In this list, we wanted to portray the top companies in Italy sorted by revenue and other factors. As you can see, most of the positions of our list are taken by companies working in the tech, IT and automotive industries.
This data on our lists alone shows us how the Italian economy and market have developed and evolved throughout the years. We can also figure out how big this market is. At the beginning of this article, we said that Italy is the 8th biggest national economy the World. In the world, and 4th in Europe, which talks for itself. Italy is not only a great location to open a start-up or fully-fledged business, but also a great market to look for workers, business partners, and customers. If you are looking for them you can contact Datantify for an Italian business directory that will help you launch your business there. The competition may be huge, but it depends on the niche you will choose. But you shouldn’t be discouraged by this fact. With all this information you have now and with the great tools available you will achieve success.
If you want to make contact with them or other great Italian companies you don’t have to search for the contact data by yourself. By using databases from Datantify you are saving your time and making this process a lot easier. Don’t delay, try today.
Thank you for visiting our site. We hope that this information is useful to you and your company.

with active e-mails, phone numbers
and more
[…] you could conduct a transaction. No doubt you have heard about more global marketplaces such as Rakuten, eBay, Alibaba, and AliExpress. Using of its services can lead to conquering international markets […]
[…] countries give us an array of possibilities to do. We are able not only to travel abroad but also start an international business. It is a good idea for people who want to expand into global markets, reach a new segment of […]
[…] Read also our previous article:Top 40 companies of ASX by market cap https://datantify.com/knowledge/top-40-companies-of-asx-by-market-cap/ […]
[…] Read also our previous article: TOP 50 Largest Financial Companies in the World in 2020https://datantify.com/knowledge/top-50-largest-financial-companies-in-the-world-in-2020/ […]