Top Companies in Japan by Revenue, Market cap and More [2019 Edition]
The Japanese economy is one of the biggest economies in the world. To be precise, it takes third place by nominal GDP and better countries are only China and the United States. When we look at the Japan industries list, there are some positions the country is especially known for. Starting with automobile manufacturing, through a high-developed electronics goods sector, to biochemistry processes. The catalog of fields where Japan gets involved is very diversified, so companies handlining different lines of business are able to show off their talents. Well, but do we know which those companies are?
1. Introduction
On the basis of the up-to-date information about companies in Japan from Datantify website, we have created few lists which should be seen by everyone who is interested in the Japanese economy or want to get to know the names of the biggest companies in Japan. Although the country specializes in the automobile industry, agriculture or tourism, there is a place for oil and gas companies, technological groups and multinational food and beverage entities. So, let’s see what names have been included in the profiles below.
2. Quick summary
We have already mentioned that the presented paper is about the biggest companies in Japan. The thing you should also know is connected with the classification of our lists. We divided the top businesses in Japan into five rankings. The first list pertains to the largest companies by revenue. The next part is about market capitalization, and the third one joins the biggest firms by the number of stores. The last two paragraphs are dedicated to employees – we might find information about the number of workers and see which places are the best to work.
Check out how we get data for our rankings
3. The top companies in Japan by revenue
The inherent element of every thriving business is its revenue. A definition of this term refers to the amount of money the company receives from service providing and product selling. Some entities are getting the revenue from charging fees or interest, e.g., bank institutions. Moreover, revenue, just next to the expenses, appears in every financial statement analysis. It can determine an income from operating activities in general, or companies might state it in a monetary unit for a specified period. Understanding the term lets us make a list of the biggest companies in Japan by their revenues. Feel free to check all positions and see which entities are the best there.
# | Name | Revenue | Type | Founded | Headquarter | Links |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() | $311.87B | public | 1907 | Den Haag, NL | |
2 | ![]() | $267.55B | public | 1937 | Toyota City, JP | |
3 | ![]() | $265.6B | public | 1976 | Cupertino, US | |
4 | ![]() | $232.89B | public | 1994 | Seattle, US | |
5 | ![]() | $206.03B | public | 1969 | Suwon, KR | |
6 | ![]() | $174.05B | public | 1938 | Seoul, KR | |
7 | ![]() | $170.76B | public | 1876 | Dallas, US | |
8 | ![]() | $148.9B | public | 1985 | Paris, FR | |
9 | ![]() | $139.89B | public | 1959 | Tokyo, JP | |
10 | ![]() | $121.61B | public | 1892 | Boston, US | |
11 | ![]() | $110.58B | public | 1904 | Charlotte, US | |
12 | ![]() | $107.46B | public | 1984 | Chiyoda City, JP | |
13 | ![]() | $101.13B | public | 1916 | Chicago, US | |
14 | ![]() | $92.98B | public | 1847 | München, DE | |
15 | ![]() | $88.26B | public | 1866 | Vevey, CH | |
16 | ![]() | $86.34B | public | 1910 | Tokyo, JP | |
17 | ![]() | $81.87B | private | 1886 | Gerlingen, DE | |
18 | ![]() | $81.58B | public | 1886 | New Brunswick, US | |
19 | ![]() | $79.59B | public | 1911 | Armonk, US | |
20 | ![]() | $77.81B | public | 1946 | Tokyo, JP | |
21 | ![]() | $74.99B | subsidiary | 1998 | Mountain View, US | |
22 | ![]() | $72.69B | public | 1918 | Kadoma, JP | |
23 | ![]() | $70.85B | public | 1968 | Santa Clara, US | |
24 | ![]() | $68.91B | public | 1950 | Chiyoda-ku, JP | |
25 | ![]() | $64.19B | subsidiary | 1969 | Bonn, DE | |
26 | ![]() | $59.43B | public | 1923 | Burbank, US | |
27 | ![]() | $59.11B | public | 1948 | Nagoya, JP | |
28 | ![]() | $58.47B | public | 1939 | Palo Alto, US | |
29 | ![]() | $55.84B | public | 2004 | Menlo Park, US | |
30 | ![]() | $50.18B | public | 1858 | Tokyo, JP | |
31 | ![]() | $49.11B | public | 1996 | Basel, CH | |
32 | ![]() | $46.4B | public | 1999 | Essen, DE | |
33 | ![]() | $45.35B | public | 1984 | Hong Kong, HK | |
34 | ![]() | $43.96B | public | 1919 | Tokyo, JP | |
35 | ![]() | $43.24B | public | 1887 | Toronto, CA | |
36 | ![]() | $42.29B | public | 1891 | Kenilworth, US | |
37 | ![]() | $41.8B | public | 1906 | Morris Plains, US | |
38 | ![]() | $41.6B | public | 1989 | Dublin 4, IE | |
39 | ![]() | $41.49B | public | 2004 | Paris, FR | |
40 | ![]() | $40.9B | public | 1921 | Tokyo, JP | |
41 | ![]() | $39.2B | public | 1863 | Leverkusen, DE | |
42 | ![]() | $37.16B | public | 1937 | Tokyo, JP | |
43 | ![]() | $36.68B | public | 1999 | Hangzhou, CN | |
44 | ![]() | $36.4B | public | 1972 | Beaverton, US | |
45 | ![]() | $36.11B | public | 1862 | Zurich, CH | |
46 | ![]() | $35.99B | public | 1935 | Minato, JP | |
47 | ![]() | $35.95B | public | 1875 | Minato-ku, JP | |
48 | ![]() | $33.92B | public | 2005 | Tokyo, JP | |
49 | ![]() | $31.86B | public | 1886 | Atlanta, US | |
50 | ![]() | $30.85B | public | 1939 | Palo Alto, US | |
51 | ![]() | $30.58B | public | 1991 | Illinois City, US | |
52 | ![]() | $30.39B | public | 1978 | Boise, US | |
53 | ![]() | $30.09B | public | 1939 | Falls Church, US | |
54 | ![]() | $29.95B | public | 1949 | Minneapolis, US | |
55 | ![]() | $29.68B | public | 1935 | Englewood, US | |
56 | ![]() | $29.44B | public | 1953 | Shibuya-ku, JP | |
57 | ![]() | $29.19B | public | 1999 | Cambridge, GB | |
58 | ![]() | $28.37B | public | 1985 | Arteixo, ES | |
59 | ![]() | $27.02B | public | 1984 | Doral, US | |
60 | ![]() | $26.49B | public | 1996 | Zürich, CH | |
61 | ![]() | $26.27B | public | 1972 | Newtown Square, US | |
62 | ![]() | $26.23B | public | 2015 | Chicago, US | |
63 | ![]() | $25.9B | public | 1899 | Tokyo, JP | |
64 | ![]() | $25.63B | public | 1897 | Osaka, JP | |
65 | ![]() | $25.44B | public | 1969 | Singapore, SG | |
66 | ![]() | $24.72B | public | 1971 | Seattle, US | |
67 | ![]() | $23.77B | public | 1919 | Columbus, US | |
68 | ![]() | $23.76B | public | 1920 | Herzogenaurach, DE | |
69 | ![]() | $23.52B | public | 1902 | Paris, FR | |
70 | ![]() | $23.44B | public | 1930 | Monroe, US | |
71 | ![]() | $23.31B | public | 1898 | Memphis, US | |
72 | ![]() | $23.17B | public | 1997 | Nanterre, FR | |
73 | ![]() | $22.78B | public | 1921 | Tokyo, JP | |
74 | ![]() | $22.42B | public | 1876 | Düsseldorf, DE | |
75 | ![]() | $21.81B | public | 1988 | Irving, US | |
76 | ![]() | $21.46B | public | 2003 | Palo Alto, US | |
77 | ![]() | $21.19B | public | 1884 | London, GB | |
78 | ![]() | $20.86B | public | 1876 | Stockholm, SE | |
79 | ![]() | $20.16B | public | 1990 | Los Angeles, US | |
80 | ![]() | $20.08B | public | 1926 | Tokyo, JP | |
81 | ![]() | $20.05B | public | 1980 | Fremont, US | |
82 | ![]() | $19.4B | public | 1963 | Yamaguchi-shi, JP | |
83 | ![]() | $19.28B | public | 1967 | Tokyo, JP | |
84 | ![]() | $19.17B | public | 1912 | Irving, US | |
85 | ![]() | $18.6B | public | 1931 | Tokyo, JP | |
86 | ![]() | $18.35B | public | 1817 | London, GB | |
87 | ![]() | $17.75B | public | 1893 | Paris, FR | |
88 | ![]() | $17.64B | public | 2005 | San Jose, US | |
89 | ![]() | $17.59B | public | 1968 | Mumbai, IN | |
90 | ![]() | $17.44B | public | 2016 | Plymouth, US | |
91 | ![]() | $16.37B | public | 1823 | Slough, GB | |
92 | ![]() | $16.24B | public | 1942 | Montréal, CA | |
93 | ![]() | $16.12B | public | 1994 | Paris, FR | |
94 | ![]() | $15.86B | public | 1969 | San Francisco, US | |
95 | ![]() | $15.79B | public | 1997 | Los Gatos, US | |
96 | ![]() | $15.78B | public | 1930 | Dallas, US | |
97 | ![]() | $15.7B | public | 1946 | Herzogenaurach, DE | |
98 | ![]() | $15.47B | public | 1898 | Akron, US | |
99 | ![]() | $14.86B | public | 2015 | Atlanta, US | |
100 | ![]() | $14.64B | subsidiary | 2000 | St. Louis, US |
Look at the dais. The third-place goes to an American technology company that is easily identified with its logo presenting a bitten apple. The revenue of the Apple company is over $265B here. Then, one of the largest Japanese companies, Toyota comes second with a result of more than $267.55. And the winner is a global group Shell – this company’s revenue is almost $312B!
4. Top Japan companies by market capitalization
There is also a possibility to look at the company by its market capitalization. Why is it such an important figure for every business? Certainly, market capitalization (also called a market cap) is very useful in evaluating the company’s value. This is due to the very notion of market capitalization, as an amount of multiplying the outstanding shares of the company by a current market price per share. Now, when you know what market cap is defined as, check the list of top Japan companies by market capitalization:
# | Name | Market cap. | Type | Founded | Headquarter | Links |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() | $960.32B | public | 1994 | Seattle, US | |
2 | ![]() | $959.23B | public | 1976 | Cupertino, US | |
3 | ![]() | $553.43B | public | 2004 | Menlo Park, US | |
4 | ![]() | $493.53B | public | 1999 | Hangzhou, CN | |
5 | ![]() | $378.14B | public | 1886 | New Brunswick, US | |
6 | ![]() | $327.94B | public | 1870 | Irving, US | |
7 | ![]() | $289.71B | public | 1904 | Charlotte, US | |
8 | ![]() | $253.26B | public | 1966 | Harrison, US | |
9 | ![]() | $241.47B | public | 1923 | Burbank, US | |
10 | ![]() | $229.31B | public | 1968 | Santa Clara, US | |
11 | ![]() | $224.02B | public | 1876 | Dallas, US | |
12 | ![]() | $211.81B | public | 1916 | Chicago, US | |
13 | ![]() | $206.78B | public | 1886 | Atlanta, US | |
14 | ![]() | $205.3B | public | 1891 | Kenilworth, US | |
15 | ![]() | $178.41B | public | 1965 | Harrison, US | |
16 | ![]() | $176.5B | public | 1937 | Toyota City, JP | |
17 | ![]() | $172.37B | public | 2008 | Leuven, BE | |
18 | ![]() | $165.56B | public | 1997 | Los Gatos, US | |
19 | ![]() | $152.07B | public | 1972 | Newtown Square, US | |
20 | ![]() | $146.13B | public | 1909 | London, GB | |
21 | ![]() | $138.82B | public | 1991 | Illinois City, US | |
22 | ![]() | $136.45B | public | 1982 | San Jose, US | |
23 | ![]() | $134.02B | public | 1972 | Beaverton, US | |
24 | ![]() | $128.89B | public | 1998 | San Jose, US | |
25 | ![]() | $125.9B | public | 1999 | San Francisco, US | |
26 | ![]() | $125.62B | public | 1906 | Morris Plains, US | |
27 | ![]() | $124.97B | public | 2005 | San Jose, US | |
28 | ![]() | $124.47B | public | 1911 | Armonk, US | |
29 | ![]() | $119.55B | public | 1949 | Minneapolis, US | |
30 | ![]() | $113.45B | public | 1876 | Indianapolis, US | |
31 | ![]() | $113.31B | public | 1923 | Bagsvaerd, DK | |
32 | ![]() | $112.42B | public | 1989 | Dublin 4, IE | |
33 | ![]() | $111.36B | public | 1993 | Santa Clara, US | |
34 | ![]() | $108.7B | public | 1930 | Dallas, US | |
35 | ![]() | $100.77B | public | 1999 | Cambridge, GB | |
36 | ![]() | $97.47B | public | 1873 | London, GB | |
37 | ![]() | $94.55B | public | 1971 | Seattle, US | |
38 | ![]() | $91.57B | public | 1892 | Boston, US | |
39 | ![]() | $83.43B | public | 1998 | Palo Alto, US | |
40 | ![]() | $81.05B | public | 1935 | New York, US | |
41 | ![]() | $76.68B | public | 1887 | New York, US | |
42 | ![]() | $76.11B | public | 1869 | New York, US | |
43 | ![]() | $75.01B | public | 1988 | New York, US | |
44 | ![]() | $71.29B | public | 1941 | Portage, US | |
45 | ![]() | $69.76B | public | 1949 | Roseland, US | |
46 | ![]() | $65.87B | public | 1929 | London, GB | |
47 | ![]() | $65.35B | public | 1946 | Tokyo, JP | |
48 | ![]() | $58.64B | public | 1995 | Sunnyvale, US | |
49 | ![]() | $54.84B | public | 1986 | Dublin, IE | |
50 | ![]() | $54.35B | public | 1908 | Detroit, US | |
51 | ![]() | $53.15B | public | 1923 | Naperville, US | |
52 | ![]() | $51.63B | public | 1862 | Zurich, CH | |
53 | ![]() | $51.3B | public | 1979 | Marlborough, US | |
54 | ![]() | $49.81B | public | 2004 | Santa Clara, US | |
55 | ![]() | $49.23B | public | 1939 | Falls Church, US | |
56 | ![]() | $49.22B | public | 1959 | Tokyo, JP | |
57 | ![]() | $48.43B | public | 1983 | San Francisco, US | |
58 | ![]() | $47.31B | public | 1907 | Danbury, US | |
59 | ![]() | $46.62B | public | 1978 | Boise, US | |
60 | ![]() | $46.14B | public | 1940 | Allentown, US | |
61 | ![]() | $45.97B | public | 1998 | San Diego, US | |
62 | ![]() | $45.22B | public | 1981 | Bengaluru, IN | |
63 | ![]() | $44.77B | public | 2005 | Pleasanton, US | |
64 | ![]() | $44.36B | public | 2003 | Palo Alto, US | |
65 | ![]() | $43.24B | public | 1988 | Zürich, CH | |
66 | ![]() | $43.22B | public | 1919 | London, GB | |
67 | ![]() | $43.07B | public | 1965 | Norwood, US | |
68 | ![]() | $40.1B | public | 1998 | Redwood City, US | |
69 | ![]() | $39.24B | public | 2015 | Chicago, US | |
70 | ![]() | $38.37B | public | 1971 | London, GB | |
71 | ![]() | $38.06B | public | 1982 | San Rafael, US | |
72 | ![]() | $36.6B | public | 1887 | Toronto, CA | |
73 | ![]() | $36.59B | public | 1690 | London, GB | |
74 | ![]() | $36.55B | public | 1909 | New York, US | |
75 | ![]() | $33.73B | public | 1994 | Paris, FR | |
76 | ![]() | $31.82B | public | 1856 | Zurich, CH | |
77 | ![]() | $31.69B | public | 1876 | Stockholm, SE | |
78 | ![]() | $31.11B | public | 1939 | Palo Alto, US | |
79 | ![]() | $30.82B | public | 2006 | Eindhoven, NL | |
80 | ![]() | $30.1B | public | 1984 | San Jose, US | |
81 | ![]() | $29.88B | public | 1932 | Wallingford, US | |
82 | ![]() | $29.87B | public | 1846 | London, GB | |
83 | ![]() | $29.68B | public | 1937 | Tokyo, JP | |
84 | ![]() | $29.0B | public | 1865 | Espoo, FI | |
85 | ![]() | $26.65B | public | 1919 | Columbus, US | |
86 | ![]() | $26.62B | public | 2002 | Sydney, AU | |
87 | ![]() | $25.12B | public | 1851 | Corning, US | |
88 | ![]() | $24.83B | public | 1999 | Santa Clara, US | |
89 | ![]() | $24.6B | public | 2006 | Stockholm, SE | |
90 | ![]() | $23.87B | public | 1989 | Chandler, US | |
91 | ![]() | $23.62B | public | 1928 | Chicago, US | |
92 | ![]() | $23.52B | public | 2005 | Santa Clara, US | |
93 | ![]() | $23.44B | public | 1971 | Jersey City, US | |
94 | ![]() | $23.23B | public | 1828 | London, GB | |
95 | ![]() | $22.9B | public | 1918 | Cleveland, US | |
96 | ![]() | $22.79B | public | 1959 | London, GB | |
97 | ![]() | $21.83B | public | 1939 | Palo Alto, US | |
98 | ![]() | $21.54B | public | 1983 | Westbrook, US | |
99 | ![]() | $21.03B | public | 1997 | Milpitas, US | |
100 | ![]() | $20.98B | public | 1895 | Melbourne, US |
As you can see, Amazon, Apple, Facebook, Alibaba, and Johnson & Johnson ranking from one to five. These brands run to different kinds of services, and they are known all over the world. The highest result exceeds $960B so classified it for a large market cap (market capitalization up to $10 billion).
See also: Top Companies in Spain by Revenue, Market Cap and More
5. The largest companies in Japan by number of stores
This part of the article is dedicated to the largest companies in Japan by a number of stores. Before you look at the created list, we would lift the veil of secrecy and present you some positions you can find there. First of all, there are some Japanese corporations. For instance, Gurunavi (the biggest gourmet & restaurant guide in Japan) or Sanyo Denki (a group dealing with developing and manufacturing cooling fans and cooling systems). Naturally, you will also find Japan multinational companies, such as KPMG or Deloitte. If you want to know how many stores they have there, the list below dispels all doubts:
# | Name | Stores | Type | Founded | Headquarter | Links |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() | 24 | private | 1987 | Amstelveen, NL | |
2 | ![]() | 21 | private | 1989 | Chiyoda, JP | |
3 | ![]() | 19 | public | 1997 | Tōkyō-to, JP | |
4 | ![]() | 19 | public | 1952 | Osaka, JP | |
5 | ![]() | 18 | private | 1845 | New York, US | |
6 | ![]() | 17 | public | 1936 | Yokohama-shi, JP | |
7 | ![]() | 16 | public | 1919 | Tokyo, JP | |
8 | ![]() | 14 | public | 1919 | Tokyo, JP | |
9 | ![]() | 14 | public | 1927 | Tokyo, JP | |
10 | ![]() | 13 | public | 1988 | Zürich, CH | |
11 | ![]() | 13 | public | 1947 | Chiyoda, JP | |
12 | ![]() | 12 | public | 1954 | Westlake, US | |
13 | ![]() | 11 | public | 1921 | Tokyo, JP | |
14 | ![]() | 10 | public | 1919 | Osaka, JP | |
15 | ![]() | 10 | public | 1925 | Kawasaki, JP | |
16 | ![]() | 9 | public | 1875 | Minato-ku, JP | |
17 | ![]() | 9 | public | 1948 | Ota-ku, JP | |
18 | ![]() | 9 | subsidiary | 1998 | Minato, JP | |
19 | ![]() | 8 | public | 1953 | Stockholm, SE | |
20 | ![]() | 8 | public | 1955 | Tokyo, JP | |
21 | ![]() | 8 | public | 1981 | Hamamatsu-shi, JP | |
22 | ![]() | 7 | public | 1950 | Chiyoda-ku, JP | |
23 | ![]() | 7 | public | 1926 | Tokyo, JP | |
24 | ![]() | 7 | public | 1992 | Methuen, US | |
25 | ![]() | 7 | private | 1910 | Golden, US | |
26 | ![]() | 7 | private | 2012 | Tokyo, JP | |
27 | ![]() | 6 | public | 1910 | Tokyo, JP | |
28 | ![]() | 6 | public | 1944 | Nagaokakyo, JP | |
29 | ![]() | 6 | public | 1884 | Atlanta, US | |
30 | ![]() | 6 | public | 1853 | Tokyo, JP | |
31 | ![]() | 6 | public | 1906 | Freienbach, CH | |
32 | ![]() | 6 | public | 1953 | Shibuya, JP | |
33 | ![]() | 6 | public | 1937 | None | |
34 | ![]() | 6 | public | 1953 | Tokyo, JP | |
35 | ![]() | 6 | public | 1962 | Chiyoda-ku, JP | |
36 | ![]() | 6 | public | 1970 | Tokyo, JP | |
37 | ![]() | 6 | public | 1977 | Hidaka, JP | |
38 | ![]() | 6 | subsidiary | 1938 | None | |
39 | ![]() | 6 | public | 1982 | San Jose, US | |
40 | ![]() | 5 | public | 1897 | Osaka, JP | |
41 | ![]() | 5 | public | 1935 | Minato, JP | |
42 | ![]() | 5 | public | 1939 | Palo Alto, US | |
43 | ![]() | 5 | public | 1876 | Düsseldorf, DE | |
44 | ![]() | 5 | public | 1906 | Chiyoda, JP | |
45 | ![]() | 5 | public | 1935 | Tokyo , JP | |
46 | ![]() | 5 | public | 1929 | Kyoto, JP | |
47 | ![]() | 5 | public | 1968 | Beuningen, NL | |
48 | ![]() | 5 | public | 1966 | Billerica, US | |
49 | ![]() | 5 | public | 1923 | Sumida-ku, JP | |
50 | ![]() | 4 | public | 1968 | Santa Clara, US | |
51 | ![]() | 4 | public | 1972 | Newtown Square, US | |
52 | ![]() | 4 | public | 1939 | Palo Alto, US | |
53 | ![]() | 4 | public | 1978 | Boise, US | |
54 | ![]() | 4 | subsidiary | 1993 | Raleigh, US | |
55 | ![]() | 4 | public | 1991 | Waterloo, CA | |
56 | ![]() | 4 | public | 1970 | The Woodlands, US | |
57 | ![]() | 4 | public | 1926 | Tokyo, JP | |
58 | ![]() | 4 | public | 1917 | Tokyo, JP | |
59 | ![]() | 4 | public | 1870 | Göttingen, DE | |
60 | ![]() | 4 | public | 1998 | Cambridge, US | |
61 | ![]() | 4 | public | 1997 | Milpitas, US | |
62 | ![]() | 4 | public | 2009 | San Jose, US | |
63 | ![]() | 4 | public | 1925 | Tokyo, JP | |
64 | ![]() | 4 | public | 1988 | Irving, US | |
65 | ![]() | 4 | public | 1918 | Sumida, JP | |
66 | ![]() | 4 | public | 1948 | Tokyo, JP | |
67 | ![]() | 4 | public | 1963 | Inazawa, JP | |
68 | ![]() | 4 | private | Minato, JP | ||
69 | ![]() | 3 | public | 1968 | Mumbai, IN | |
70 | ![]() | 3 | public | 1994 | Seattle, US | |
71 | ![]() | 3 | public | 1937 | Toyota City, JP | |
72 | ![]() | 3 | public | 1985 | Paris, FR | |
73 | ![]() | 3 | public | 1898 | Akron, US | |
74 | ![]() | 3 | public | 1923 | Naperville, US | |
75 | ![]() | 3 | public | 1948 | Nagoya, JP | |
76 | ![]() | 3 | public | 1923 | New York, US | |
77 | ![]() | 3 | public | 2006 | Eindhoven, NL | |
78 | ![]() | 3 | public | 1999 | Neubiberg, DE | |
79 | ![]() | 3 | public | 1963 | Yamaguchi-shi, JP | |
80 | ![]() | 3 | public | 1884 | Tokyo, JP | |
81 | ![]() | 3 | public | 1919 | London, GB | |
82 | ![]() | 3 | public | 1982 | San Jose, US | |
83 | ![]() | 3 | public | 1930 | Berwyn, US | |
84 | ![]() | 3 | public | 1976 | West Berkshire, GB | |
85 | ![]() | 3 | public | 1979 | Stamford, US | |
86 | ![]() | 3 | public | 1998 | Redwood City, US | |
87 | ![]() | 3 | public | 1983 | Neihu District, TW | |
88 | ![]() | 3 | public | 1976 | Austin, US | |
89 | ![]() | 3 | subsidiary | 1949 | Yamaguchi-shi, JP | |
90 | ![]() | 3 | public | 2006 | Waterford, US | |
91 | ![]() | 3 | public | 1985 | Needham, US | |
92 | ![]() | 3 | public | 2005 | Santa Clara, US | |
93 | ![]() | 3 | public | 1960 | Billerica, US | |
94 | ![]() | 3 | public | 2004 | Milpitas, US | |
95 | ![]() | 3 | public | 1960 | North Reading, US | |
96 | ![]() | 3 | private | 1947 | Riverside, US | |
97 | ![]() | 3 | public | 1992 | Wiesbaden, DE | |
98 | ![]() | 3 | subsidiary | 2008 | Aichi, JP | |
99 | ![]() | 2 | public | 1994 | Paris, FR | |
100 | ![]() | 2 | public | 1876 | Dallas, US |
6. The biggest Japan businesses by number of employees
Now, it is time to present to you a ranking of the biggest Japan businesses by their number of employees. In the list, you can see many popular international names. Maybe you have used their services recently, or even you are a member of the team. What do you think, who the winner is here? You bet on domestic business, or it would be an American company in Japan? Let’s figure it out!
# | Name | Employees | Type | Founded | Headquarter | Links |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() | 630600 | public | 1994 | Seattle, US | |
2 | ![]() | 459000 | public | 1989 | Dublin 4, IE | |
3 | ![]() | 417929 | public | 1968 | Mumbai, IN | |
4 | ![]() | 410000 | private | 1886 | Gerlingen, DE | |
5 | ![]() | 379000 | public | 1847 | München, DE | |
6 | ![]() | 371796 | public | 1937 | Toyota City, JP | |
7 | ![]() | 350600 | public | 1911 | Armonk, US | |
8 | ![]() | 323000 | public | 1866 | Vevey, CH | |
9 | ![]() | 320671 | public | 1969 | Suwon, KR | |
10 | ![]() | 320000 | public | 1960 | Ann Arbor, US | |
11 | ![]() | 308745 | public | 1938 | Seoul, KR | |
12 | ![]() | 305289 | public | 1910 | Tokyo, JP | |
13 | ![]() | 291000 | public | 1971 | Seattle, US | |
14 | ![]() | 283000 | public | 1892 | Boston, US | |
15 | ![]() | 282550 | public | 1984 | Chiyoda City, JP | |
16 | ![]() | 281600 | public | 1994 | Paris, FR | |
17 | ![]() | 273858 | public | 1918 | Kadoma, JP | |
18 | ![]() | 268000 | public | 1876 | Dallas, US | |
19 | ![]() | 264041 | public | 1806 | Mumbai, IN | |
20 | ![]() | 263900 | private | 1845 | New York, US | |
21 | ![]() | 263000 | public | 1965 | Harrison, US | |
22 | ![]() | 255133 | public | 1897 | Osaka, JP | |
23 | ![]() | 229000 | public | 1980 | Fremont, US | |
24 | ![]() | 215638 | public | 1959 | Tokyo, JP | |
25 | ![]() | 211313 | public | 1967 | Paris, FR | |
26 | ![]() | 205000 | public | 1904 | Charlotte, US | |
27 | ![]() | 204107 | public | 1981 | Bengaluru, IN | |
28 | ![]() | 201000 | public | 1923 | Burbank, US | |
29 | ![]() | 200000 | public | 1969 | Singapore, SG | |
30 | ![]() | 197673 | public | 1937 | Tokyo, JP | |
31 | ![]() | 193279 | private | 1987 | Amstelveen, NL | |
32 | ![]() | 181001 | public | 1665 | Courbevoie, FR | |
33 | ![]() | 180000 | private | 1987 | Shenzhen, CN | |
34 | ![]() | 174386 | public | 1985 | Arteixo, ES | |
35 | ![]() | 173000 | public | 1957 | Aurora, CA | |
36 | ![]() | 173000 | public | 1908 | Detroit, US | |
37 | ![]() | 172603 | public | 2008 | Leuven, BE | |
38 | ![]() | 163827 | public | 1945 | Bengaluru, IN | |
39 | ![]() | 161659 | subsidiary | 1998 | Mountain View, US | |
40 | ![]() | 160566 | public | 1929 | London, GB | |
41 | ![]() | 153000 | public | 1916 | Chicago, US | |
42 | ![]() | 146600 | public | 1988 | Zürich, CH | |
43 | ![]() | 142340 | public | 1921 | Tokyo, JP | |
44 | ![]() | 141256 | public | 1875 | Minato-ku, JP | |
45 | ![]() | 140365 | public | 1935 | Minato, JP | |
46 | ![]() | 135100 | public | 1886 | New Brunswick, US | |
47 | ![]() | 135000 | public | 1969 | San Francisco, US | |
48 | ![]() | 132000 | public | 1976 | Cupertino, US | |
49 | ![]() | 128584 | public | 1999 | Essen, DE | |
50 | ![]() | 122110 | public | 1997 | Bezons, FR | |
51 | ![]() | 121597 | public | 1996 | Basel, CH | |
52 | ![]() | 120081 | public | 1999 | Noida, IN | |
53 | ![]() | 118196 | public | 1863 | Leverkusen, DE | |
54 | ![]() | 118006 | public | 1967 | Tokyo, JP | |
55 | ![]() | 117300 | public | 1946 | Tokyo, JP | |
56 | ![]() | 115686 | public | 1997 | Nanterre, FR | |
57 | ![]() | 114000 | public | 1906 | Morris Plains, US | |
58 | ![]() | 111588 | public | 1985 | Paris, FR | |
59 | ![]() | 109390 | public | 1899 | Tokyo, JP | |
60 | ![]() | 108800 | public | 1968 | Santa Clara, US | |
61 | ![]() | 107554 | public | 1983 | Kyoto, JP | |
62 | ![]() | 105800 | public | 1846 | London, GB | |
63 | ![]() | 104226 | public | 2004 | Paris, FR | |
64 | ![]() | 103000 | public | 1865 | Espoo, FI | |
65 | ![]() | 103000 | public | 1991 | Illinois City, US | |
66 | ![]() | 102883 | public | 1935 | Tokyo, JP | |
67 | ![]() | 102086 | public | 1858 | Tokyo, JP | |
68 | ![]() | 101550 | public | 1999 | Hangzhou, CN | |
69 | ![]() | 100735 | public | 1876 | Stockholm, SE | |
70 | ![]() | 97878 | public | 1936 | Yokohama-shi, JP | |
71 | ![]() | 97368 | public | 1878 | Genève, CH | |
72 | ![]() | 96498 | public | 1972 | Newtown Square, US | |
73 | ![]() | 93557 | public | 1949 | Chiyoda-ku, JP | |
74 | ![]() | 92836 | public | 1946 | Herzogenaurach, DE | |
75 | ![]() | 90000 | public | 1783 | Chicago, US | |
76 | ![]() | 87000 | public | 1990 | Los Angeles, US | |
77 | ![]() | 86000 | public | 1949 | Minneapolis, US | |
78 | ![]() | 85000 | public | 2016 | Plymouth, US | |
79 | ![]() | 85000 | public | 1939 | Falls Church, US | |
80 | ![]() | 84813 | subsidiary | 1969 | Bonn, DE | |
81 | ![]() | 83500 | public | 1690 | London, GB | |
82 | ![]() | 82838 | public | 1853 | London, GB | |
83 | ![]() | 82000 | public | 1907 | Den Haag, NL | |
84 | ![]() | 80000 | public | 1997 | New York, US | |
85 | ![]() | 78351 | public | 1951 | Tokyo, JP | |
86 | ![]() | 77739 | public | 1934 | Tokyo, JP | |
87 | ![]() | 77164 | public | 1950 | Chiyoda-ku, JP | |
88 | ![]() | 76391 | public | 1942 | Suwa, JP | |
89 | ![]() | 75940 | public | 1959 | Kyoto, JP | |
90 | ![]() | 75326 | public | 1944 | Nagaokakyo, JP | |
91 | ![]() | 73600 | public | 1932 | Wallingford, US | |
92 | ![]() | 73100 | public | 1972 | Beaverton, US | |
93 | ![]() | 71000 | public | 1870 | Irving, US | |
94 | ![]() | 70263 | public | 1924 | Osaka, JP | |
95 | ![]() | 69700 | public | 1909 | London, GB | |
96 | ![]() | 69230 | public | 2005 | Tokyo, JP | |
97 | ![]() | 69000 | public | 1891 | Kenilworth, US | |
98 | ![]() | 66888 | public | 1862 | Zurich, CH | |
99 | ![]() | 66000 | public | 1893 | Paris, FR | |
100 | ![]() | 65000 | public | 1902 | Paris, FR |
The first position and 630600 employees hired. This score is really impressive. Especially when the second place is significantly lower – thus the Accenture group joins 459000 people. As you can see, the Indian IT service and consulting company Tata Consultancy Service comes third with a result of more than 417900 employees.
Learn more about our ranking using policy
7. Japan largest companies as the best places to work in
Finally, we also prepared something useful for everyone who is looking for a job in the biggest companies in Japan. Here you have just a list of the best places to work in. It is based on the employees’ votes, where they could express their opinions about the culture and values in the company. The ratings are also about the matter connecting work and life, so the employee should not be overwhelmed and has enough time for family, friends, and hobbies. What is more, the data placed on the list might also be a good source of information for employers. They should learn from the best!
# | Name | Votes | Ratings | Culture & values | Work/life balance | Type | Headquarter | Links |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() | 10161 | 4.5 | 4.5 | 4.4 | public | Newtown Square, US | |
2 | ![]() | 4965 | 4.4 | 4.6 | 4.2 | public | San Francisco, US | |
3 | ![]() | 8609 | 4.4 | 4.4 | 4.1 | subsidiary | Mountain View, US | |
4 | ![]() | 8044 | 4.1 | 4.2 | 4.2 | public | Espoo, FI | |
5 | ![]() | 7062 | 4.0 | 3.8 | 4.0 | public | München, DE | |
6 | ![]() | 4294 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 3.7 | public | London, GB | |
7 | ![]() | 14628 | 4.0 | 4.1 | 3.4 | public | Cupertino, US | |
8 | ![]() | 42120 | 3.9 | 3.9 | 3.4 | public | Dublin 4, IE | |
9 | ![]() | 4934 | 3.9 | 4.1 | 3.9 | public | New Brunswick, US | |
10 | ![]() | 4365 | 3.9 | 3.8 | 3.8 | public | Den Haag, NL | |
11 | ![]() | 12644 | 3.9 | 3.8 | 3.8 | public | Santa Clara, US | |
12 | ![]() | 2774 | 3.9 | 3.9 | 3.3 | public | Chicago, US | |
13 | ![]() | 2048 | 3.9 | 4.2 | 4.0 | public | Palo Alto, US | |
14 | ![]() | 2944 | 3.9 | 4.2 | 4.0 | public | Columbus, US | |
15 | ![]() | 1444 | 3.8 | 3.7 | 3.9 | public | London, GB | |
16 | ![]() | 1709 | 3.8 | 3.9 | 3.3 | public | Toyota City, JP | |
17 | ![]() | 27837 | 3.8 | 3.8 | 3.0 | private | New York, US | |
18 | ![]() | 1693 | 3.8 | 3.7 | 3.4 | public | Irving, US | |
19 | ![]() | 1422 | 3.8 | 3.7 | 3.5 | public | Düsseldorf, DE | |
20 | ![]() | 1921 | 3.8 | 3.8 | 3.7 | public | Cambridge, GB | |
21 | ![]() | 21269 | 3.8 | 4.0 | 3.5 | public | Seattle, US | |
22 | ![]() | 2872 | 3.7 | 3.5 | 3.5 | public | Basel, CH | |
23 | ![]() | 7198 | 3.7 | 3.9 | 3.5 | public | New York, US | |
24 | ![]() | 425 | 3.7 | 3.6 | 3.3 | public | Illinois City, US | |
25 | ![]() | 2947 | 3.7 | 3.7 | 3.3 | public | Vevey, CH | |
26 | ![]() | 4760 | 3.7 | 3.6 | 3.8 | public | Falls Church, US | |
27 | ![]() | 36524 | 3.7 | 3.8 | 3.7 | public | Mumbai, IN | |
28 | ![]() | 3171 | 3.7 | 3.6 | 3.7 | public | Kenilworth, US | |
29 | ![]() | 518 | 3.7 | 3.5 | 3.1 | public | Tokyo, JP | |
30 | ![]() | 203 | 3.7 | 3.9 | 3.9 | subsidiary | San Bruno, US | |
31 | ![]() | 1299 | 3.7 | 3.7 | 4.0 | public | Plan-les-Ouates, CH | |
32 | ![]() | 28271 | 3.6 | 3.5 | 3.4 | public | Paris, FR | |
33 | ![]() | 787 | 3.6 | 3.7 | 3.7 | public | Corning, US | |
34 | ![]() | 138 | 3.6 | 3.3 | 3.5 | public | Chiyoda-ku, JP | |
35 | ![]() | 3059 | 3.6 | 3.5 | 3.6 | public | London, GB | |
36 | ![]() | 4440 | 3.6 | 3.6 | 3.6 | public | Zurich, CH | |
37 | ![]() | 2739 | 3.6 | 3.6 | 3.5 | public | Chicago, US | |
38 | ![]() | 29 | 3.6 | 3.5 | 3.9 | public | Nagaokakyo, JP | |
39 | ![]() | 4921 | 3.6 | 3.5 | 3.4 | public | Atlanta, US | |
40 | ![]() | 21154 | 3.6 | 3.5 | 3.5 | public | Charlotte, US | |
41 | ![]() | 6885 | 3.6 | 3.2 | 3.2 | public | Morris Plains, US | |
42 | ![]() | 1785 | 3.6 | 3.4 | 3.6 | public | Paris, FR | |
43 | ![]() | 7557 | 3.6 | 3.4 | 3.0 | public | Harrison, US | |
44 | ![]() | 944 | 3.6 | 3.6 | 3.5 | public | Singapore, SG | |
45 | ![]() | 2840 | 3.6 | 3.6 | 3.6 | public | Zürich, CH | |
46 | ![]() | 44000 | 3.6 | 3.6 | 3.7 | public | Armonk, US | |
47 | ![]() | 3271 | 3.6 | 3.6 | 3.4 | public | Minneapolis, US | |
48 | ![]() | 80 | 3.5 | 3.2 | 3.0 | public | Linz, AT | |
49 | ![]() | 8855 | 3.5 | 3.8 | 3.9 | public | Stockholm, SE | |
50 | ![]() | 5041 | 3.5 | 3.5 | 3.6 | public | Zurich, CH | |
51 | ![]() | 8967 | 3.5 | 3.5 | 3.7 | public | Palo Alto, US | |
52 | ![]() | 137 | 3.5 | 3.7 | 3.9 | public | Suwa, JP | |
53 | ![]() | 182 | 3.5 | 3.0 | 3.0 | public | Kyoto, JP | |
54 | ![]() | 4430 | 3.5 | 3.7 | 3.4 | public | New York, US | |
55 | ![]() | 371 | 3.5 | 3.5 | 3.6 | public | Stockholm, SE | |
56 | ![]() | 4605 | 3.5 | 3.6 | 3.6 | public | New York, US | |
57 | ![]() | 995 | 3.5 | 3.4 | 3.2 | public | Aurora, CA | |
58 | ![]() | 7331 | 3.5 | 3.2 | 3.7 | public | Chicago, US | |
59 | ![]() | 3594 | 3.5 | 3.1 | 3.0 | public | Suwon, KR | |
60 | ![]() | 70 | 3.4 | 3.8 | 3.0 | public | Hangzhou, CN | |
61 | ![]() | 3760 | 3.4 | 3.2 | 3.0 | public | Ann Arbor, US | |
62 | ![]() | 1007 | 3.4 | 3.5 | 3.5 | public | Kadoma, JP | |
63 | ![]() | 846 | 3.4 | 3.3 | 2.8 | public | Memphis, US | |
64 | ![]() | 395 | 3.4 | 3.2 | 3.2 | public | Stockholm, SE | |
65 | ![]() | 91 | 3.3 | 3.0 | 3.3 | public | Kyoto, JP | |
66 | ![]() | 12984 | 3.3 | 3.2 | 3.5 | public | Noida, IN | |
67 | ![]() | 799 | 3.3 | 3.1 | 3.4 | public | Essen, DE | |
68 | ![]() | 2425 | 3.3 | 3.5 | 2.5 | public | Palo Alto, US | |
69 | ![]() | 1537 | 3.3 | 3.5 | 3.1 | public | Naperville, US | |
70 | ![]() | 1365 | 3.3 | 3.1 | 2.7 | public | Slough, GB | |
71 | ![]() | 1220 | 3.3 | 2.9 | 3.0 | public | Cleveland, US | |
72 | ![]() | 32959 | 3.3 | 3.8 | 3.5 | public | Bengaluru, IN | |
73 | ![]() | 14470 | 3.3 | 3.3 | 3.3 | public | Paris, FR | |
74 | ![]() | 901 | 3.3 | 3.5 | 3.4 | public | Paris, FR | |
75 | ![]() | 1000 | 3.3 | 3.1 | 3.0 | public | Akron, US | |
76 | ![]() | 1287 | 3.3 | 3.2 | 3.0 | subsidiary | Bonn, DE | |
77 | ![]() | 19236 | 3.2 | 3.6 | 3.3 | public | Bengaluru, IN | |
78 | ![]() | 2831 | 3.2 | 3.1 | 3.1 | public | Atlanta, US | |
79 | ![]() | 754 | 3.2 | 3.0 | 2.9 | public | Tokyo, JP | |
80 | ![]() | 4499 | 3.2 | 3.0 | 3.4 | public | Bezons, FR | |
81 | ![]() | 214 | 3.2 | 3.0 | 3.1 | public | Wallingford, US | |
82 | ![]() | 380 | 3.2 | 3.0 | 3.4 | public | Tokyo, JP | |
83 | ![]() | 791 | 3.2 | 3.0 | 2.9 | public | Atlanta, US | |
84 | ![]() | 1625 | 3.2 | 3.3 | 3.6 | public | Paris, FR | |
85 | ![]() | 168 | 3.2 | 3.2 | 3.0 | public | Osaka, JP | |
86 | ![]() | 204 | 3.1 | 3.0 | 3.1 | public | Plymouth, US | |
87 | ![]() | 4443 | 3.1 | 3.0 | 3.3 | public | Los Angeles, US | |
88 | ![]() | 1744 | 3.1 | 2.9 | 3.3 | public | Montréal, CA | |
89 | ![]() | 80 | 3.1 | 3.0 | 3.4 | public | Chiyoda City, JP | |
90 | ![]() | 319 | 3.1 | 2.9 | 2.6 | public | Arteixo, ES | |
91 | ![]() | 2583 | 3.1 | 3.2 | 3.4 | public | Minato, JP | |
92 | ![]() | 1390 | 3.1 | 3.1 | 2.5 | public | Leuven, BE | |
93 | ![]() | 29 | 3.02 | 3.1 | 2.7 | public | Tokyo, JP | |
94 | ![]() | 888 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 3.2 | public | Genève, CH | |
95 | ![]() | 853 | 3.0 | 2.6 | 2.5 | public | Seoul, KR | |
96 | ![]() | 917 | 2.9 | 2.9 | 3.3 | public | Yokohama-shi, JP | |
97 | ![]() | 16 | 2.84 | 2.9 | 2.8 | public | Osaka, JP | |
98 | ![]() | 252 | 2.7 | 2.9 | 3.1 | public | Fremont, US | |
99 | ![]() | 157 | 2.41 | 2.4 | 2.7 | public | Nagoya, JP | |
100 | ![]() | 1 | 2.24 | 2.0 | 3.0 | public | Tokyo, JP |
With 10161 votes and a general rate of 4.5 points, the winner is an SAP company. Other first places go to Salesforce, Google, Nokia, Siemens, and Unilever. Every company outstands its own methods for employee retention – just because of them, the business is able to thrive.
Conclusion
By dint of presented list, you know more than one the biggest company in Japan. Moreover, you found their revenues and number of stores. According to these profiles, you can also weigh up the market values of chosen companies by its market capitalization, and dive into companies’ strategies to see why pointed entities are defined as the best workplaces.
No matter of reason you are looking here, one thing is sure – you expect only verified information. Thanks to the Datantify website we are able to provide this kind of data. And this is why we encourage you to visit the portal and find directories of companies from different parts of the world.

with active e-mails, phone numbers
and more
[…] you could conduct a transaction. No doubt you have heard about more global marketplaces such as Rakuten, eBay, Alibaba, and AliExpress. Using of its services can lead to conquering international markets […]
[…] countries give us an array of possibilities to do. We are able not only to travel abroad but also start an international business. It is a good idea for people who want to expand into global markets, reach a new segment of […]
[…] Read also our previous article:Top 40 companies of ASX by market cap https://datantify.com/knowledge/top-40-companies-of-asx-by-market-cap/ […]
[…] Read also our previous article: TOP 50 Largest Financial Companies in the World in 2020https://datantify.com/knowledge/top-50-largest-financial-companies-in-the-world-in-2020/ […]