Top Companies in Spain by Revenue, Market cap and More [2019 Edition]
When we think about the economic situation in Spain, there might be different connotations in our heads. As we know, this country was a part of the so-called PIGS group, which joined countries with Eurozone crisis (it is an acronym of Portugal, Italy, Greece and obviously Spain). Moreover, the Great Recession period also encompassed this region. Along with elapsing time, its situation has started getting better. In 2017 Spanish export raised to up 8,9%, tourism has gained in importance and automobile industry has been still developing. The economic recovery is related to political actions, and the biggest companies in Spain market presence. Which of them can be called these the significant ones?
1. Introduction
Undoubtedly, companies in Spain boost the economic growth of the country. They deal in different lines of business. Starting with the electrical industry, through food and beverage major, to agribusinesses and automobile sectors. Spanish companies provide a wide range of services – just look at the names of the biggest companies and check if you have might experience using its wares.
2. Quick summary
This paper presents the biggest companies in Spain with different points of view. If you interested in which businesses are the leaders in this country by the revenue, your curiosity would be satisfied. There are also data of the top companies in Spain ordered by the highest number of employees, market capitalization and a number of stores. What is more, if you were wondering what staff members think about their jobs, you can see the list of the best place to work in the light of the respondents’ opinions.
See also: Top Companies in Sweden by Revenue, Market Cap and More
3. Top companies in Spain by revenue
We want to start with the aspect which gives a general overview of every company. This is an essential part of financial statement analysis. Furthermore, it indicates the total sum of money that a company receives from a client for providing its services or sales. Do you know now what the first list is about? Of course, the text refers to the revenue of individual companies in Spain. In our list there are the largest businesses in this regard. It’s interesting which entities can boast the highest positions, isn’t it?
# | Name | Revenue | Type | Founded | Headquarter | Links |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() | $311.87B | public | 1907 | Den Haag, NL | |
2 | ![]() | $232.89B | public | 1994 | Seattle, US | |
3 | ![]() | $183.98B | public | 1886 | Stuttgart, DE | |
4 | ![]() | $170.76B | public | 1876 | Dallas, US | |
5 | ![]() | $148.9B | public | 1985 | Paris, FR | |
6 | ![]() | $110.58B | public | 1904 | Charlotte, US | |
7 | ![]() | $110.36B | public | 1975 | Redmond, US | |
8 | ![]() | $92.98B | public | 1847 | München, DE | |
9 | ![]() | $88.26B | public | 1866 | Vevey, CH | |
10 | ![]() | $86.34B | public | 1910 | Tokyo, JP | |
11 | ![]() | $83.91B | public | 1995 | Bonn, DE | |
12 | ![]() | $81.87B | private | 1886 | Gerlingen, DE | |
13 | ![]() | $79.59B | public | 1911 | Armonk, US | |
14 | ![]() | $77.81B | public | 1946 | Tokyo, JP | |
15 | ![]() | $74.99B | subsidiary | 1998 | Mountain View, US | |
16 | ![]() | $72.69B | public | 1918 | Kadoma, JP | |
17 | ![]() | $71.33B | public | 1970 | Leiden, NL | |
18 | ![]() | $70.85B | public | 1968 | Santa Clara, US | |
19 | ![]() | $68.91B | public | 1950 | Chiyoda-ku, JP | |
20 | ![]() | $66.83B | public | 1837 | Cincinnati, US | |
21 | ![]() | $60.28B | public | 1897 | Midland, US | |
22 | ![]() | $58.73B | public | 1969 | Houston, US | |
23 | ![]() | $58.47B | public | 1939 | Palo Alto, US | |
24 | ![]() | $55.84B | public | 2004 | Menlo Park, US | |
25 | ![]() | $53.65B | public | 1849 | New York, US | |
26 | ![]() | $51.89B | public | 1958 | Seoul, KR | |
27 | ![]() | $49.33B | public | 1984 | San Jose, US | |
28 | ![]() | $49.11B | public | 1996 | Basel, CH | |
29 | ![]() | $46.4B | public | 1999 | Essen, DE | |
30 | ![]() | $43.96B | public | 1919 | Tokyo, JP | |
31 | ![]() | $43.03B | subsidiary | 1979 | Irvine, US | |
32 | ![]() | $41.8B | public | 1906 | Morris Plains, US | |
33 | ![]() | $41.6B | public | 1989 | Dublin 4, IE | |
34 | ![]() | $40.9B | public | 1921 | Tokyo, JP | |
35 | ![]() | $39.83B | public | 1977 | Redwood City, US | |
36 | ![]() | $35.99B | public | 1935 | Minato, JP | |
37 | ![]() | $35.95B | public | 1875 | Minato-ku, JP | |
38 | ![]() | $31.86B | public | 1886 | Atlanta, US | |
39 | ![]() | $30.85B | public | 1939 | Palo Alto, US | |
40 | ![]() | $29.68B | public | 1935 | Englewood, US | |
41 | ![]() | $29.14B | public | 1909 | Clichy, FR | |
42 | ![]() | $28.37B | public | 1985 | Arteixo, ES | |
43 | ![]() | $27.7B | public | 1836 | Rueil-Malmaison, FR | |
44 | ![]() | $27.06B | public | 1922 | Waltham, US | |
45 | ![]() | $26.49B | public | 1996 | Zürich, CH | |
46 | ![]() | $26.27B | public | 1972 | Newtown Square, US | |
47 | ![]() | $26.23B | public | 2015 | Chicago, US | |
48 | ![]() | $25.44B | public | 1969 | Singapore, SG | |
49 | ![]() | $24.72B | public | 1971 | Seattle, US | |
50 | ![]() | $24.7B | subsidiary | 1979 | Hopkinton, US | |
51 | ![]() | $24.59B | public | 1802 | Wilmington, US | |
52 | ![]() | $23.54B | public | 2005 | Pantin, FR | |
53 | ![]() | $23.52B | public | 1902 | Paris, FR | |
54 | ![]() | $23.31B | public | 1898 | Memphis, US | |
55 | ![]() | $23.17B | public | 1997 | Nanterre, FR | |
56 | ![]() | $22.82B | public | 1955 | Oak Brook, US | |
57 | ![]() | $22.42B | public | 1876 | Düsseldorf, DE | |
58 | ![]() | $21.81B | public | 1988 | Irving, US | |
59 | ![]() | $21.19B | public | 1884 | London, GB | |
60 | ![]() | $20.86B | public | 1876 | Stockholm, SE | |
61 | ![]() | $20.29B | public | 1891 | Amsterdam, NL | |
62 | ![]() | $20.16B | public | 1990 | Los Angeles, US | |
63 | ![]() | $19.28B | public | 1967 | Tokyo, JP | |
64 | ![]() | $19.16B | public | 1879 | München, DE | |
65 | ![]() | $18.28B | public | 1890 | Las Condes, CL | |
66 | ![]() | $17.75B | public | 1893 | Paris, FR | |
67 | ![]() | $17.64B | public | 2005 | San Jose, US | |
68 | ![]() | $17.59B | public | 1968 | Mumbai, IN | |
69 | ![]() | $17.44B | public | 2016 | Plymouth, US | |
70 | ![]() | $16.37B | public | 1823 | Slough, GB | |
71 | ![]() | $16.24B | public | 1942 | Montréal, CA | |
72 | ![]() | $16.12B | public | 1994 | Paris, FR | |
73 | ![]() | $15.79B | public | 1997 | Los Gatos, US | |
74 | ![]() | $15.78B | public | 1930 | Dallas, US | |
75 | ![]() | $15.37B | public | 1883 | Pittsburgh, US | |
76 | ![]() | $14.98B | public | 1947 | Dallas, US | |
77 | ![]() | $14.86B | public | 2015 | Atlanta, US | |
78 | ![]() | $14.64B | subsidiary | 2000 | St. Louis, US | |
79 | ![]() | $14.48B | public | 1853 | Tokyo, JP | |
80 | ![]() | $14.01B | public | 1888 | New York, US | |
81 | ![]() | $13.6B | public | 1941 | Portage, US | |
82 | ![]() | $13.55B | public | 1983 | Kyoto, JP | |
83 | ![]() | $13.4B | public | 1888 | Pittsburgh, US | |
84 | ![]() | $13.33B | public | 1949 | Roseland, US | |
85 | ![]() | $13.28B | public | 1999 | San Francisco, US | |
86 | ![]() | $13.2B | public | 1932 | Melville, US | |
87 | ![]() | $12.65B | public | 1863 | Bruxelles, BE | |
88 | ![]() | $12.56B | subsidiary | 1759 | Redditch, GB | |
89 | ![]() | $12.49B | public | 1944 | Nagaokakyo, JP | |
90 | ![]() | $12.07B | public | 1873 | Nacka, SE | |
91 | ![]() | $11.8B | public | 1981 | Bengaluru, IN | |
92 | ![]() | $11.63B | public | 1880 | Broomfield, US | |
93 | ![]() | $11.44B | public | 1907 | Danbury, US | |
94 | ![]() | $11.29B | public | 1851 | Corning, US | |
95 | ![]() | $11.22B | public | 1996 | Bellevue, US | |
96 | ![]() | $10.82B | public | 2005 | Köln, DE | |
97 | ![]() | $10.75B | public | 1995 | San Jose, US | |
98 | ![]() | $10.73B | public | 1935 | Tokyo, JP | |
99 | ![]() | $10.15B | public | 1920 | Kingsport, US | |
100 | ![]() | $9.66B | public | 1902 | Heerlen, NL |
Just look at the podium of the profile. German car producer Daimler opens it with the result of over $180B. The second place goes to American technological company Amazon (about $232B revenue), and the winner is a leader in a gas and oil industry – Shell. Its score is really impressive and amounts to more than $310B in revenue.
4. The biggest Spain companies by market cap
How to see if the company is worthy on the market? Check its market capitalization. It is connected with the number of the company’s outstanding shares and the current price of the stock. For example, a Spanish company has 1 million outstanding shares and sells it at $20 per share, and then the market cap is $20 million. We can also divide a market cap into three groups. The large-cap companies with more than $10 billion market value, mid-cap businesses with the market capitalization between $2 billion and $10 billion, and small-caps between $300 million to $2 billion market value. Check the ranking of the top companies in Spain by market capitalization and guess who is standing on the podium here.
# | Name | Market cap. | Type | Founded | Headquarter | Links |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() | $967.12B | public | 1975 | Redmond, US | |
2 | ![]() | $960.32B | public | 1994 | Seattle, US | |
3 | ![]() | $553.43B | public | 2004 | Menlo Park, US | |
4 | ![]() | $289.71B | public | 1904 | Charlotte, US | |
5 | ![]() | $264.78B | public | 1837 | Cincinnati, US | |
6 | ![]() | $253.26B | public | 1966 | Harrison, US | |
7 | ![]() | $241.85B | public | 1984 | San Jose, US | |
8 | ![]() | $229.79B | public | 1849 | New York, US | |
9 | ![]() | $229.31B | public | 1968 | Santa Clara, US | |
10 | ![]() | $224.02B | public | 1876 | Dallas, US | |
11 | ![]() | $206.78B | public | 1886 | Atlanta, US | |
12 | ![]() | $187.25B | public | 1977 | Redwood City, US | |
13 | ![]() | $172.37B | public | 2008 | Leuven, BE | |
14 | ![]() | $165.56B | public | 1997 | Los Gatos, US | |
15 | ![]() | $162.82B | public | 1812 | New York, US | |
16 | ![]() | $152.07B | public | 1972 | Newtown Square, US | |
17 | ![]() | $151.86B | public | 1955 | Oak Brook, US | |
18 | ![]() | $136.45B | public | 1982 | San Jose, US | |
19 | ![]() | $128.89B | public | 1998 | San Jose, US | |
20 | ![]() | $125.9B | public | 1999 | San Francisco, US | |
21 | ![]() | $125.62B | public | 1906 | Morris Plains, US | |
22 | ![]() | $124.97B | public | 2005 | San Jose, US | |
23 | ![]() | $124.47B | public | 1911 | Armonk, US | |
24 | ![]() | $112.42B | public | 1989 | Dublin 4, IE | |
25 | ![]() | $108.7B | public | 1930 | Dallas, US | |
26 | ![]() | $94.55B | public | 1971 | Seattle, US | |
27 | ![]() | $83.43B | public | 1998 | Palo Alto, US | |
28 | ![]() | $81.05B | public | 1935 | New York, US | |
29 | ![]() | $79.56B | public | 1857 | Madrid, ES | |
30 | ![]() | $76.11B | public | 1869 | New York, US | |
31 | ![]() | $75.01B | public | 1988 | New York, US | |
32 | ![]() | $72.89B | public | 1802 | Wilmington, US | |
33 | ![]() | $71.29B | public | 1941 | Portage, US | |
34 | ![]() | $69.76B | public | 1949 | Roseland, US | |
35 | ![]() | $65.87B | public | 1929 | London, GB | |
36 | ![]() | $65.35B | public | 1946 | Tokyo, JP | |
37 | ![]() | $62.7B | public | 1836 | Rueil-Malmaison, FR | |
38 | ![]() | $60.07B | public | 1792 | Bloomfield, US | |
39 | ![]() | $54.84B | public | 1986 | Dublin, IE | |
40 | ![]() | $53.15B | public | 1923 | Naperville, US | |
41 | ![]() | $50.18B | public | 1922 | Waltham, US | |
42 | ![]() | $49.81B | public | 2004 | Santa Clara, US | |
43 | ![]() | $47.31B | public | 1907 | Danbury, US | |
44 | ![]() | $46.14B | public | 1940 | Allentown, US | |
45 | ![]() | $45.22B | public | 1981 | Bengaluru, IN | |
46 | ![]() | $45.13B | public | 1868 | New York, US | |
47 | ![]() | $44.77B | public | 2005 | Pleasanton, US | |
48 | ![]() | $43.24B | public | 1988 | Zürich, CH | |
49 | ![]() | $43.22B | public | 1919 | London, GB | |
50 | ![]() | $42.37B | public | 1924 | Madrid, ES | |
51 | ![]() | $41.56B | public | 1993 | Paris, FR | |
52 | ![]() | $40.1B | public | 1998 | Redwood City, US | |
53 | ![]() | $40.09B | public | 1897 | Midland, US | |
54 | ![]() | $39.86B | public | 1857 | Bilbao, ES | |
55 | ![]() | $39.24B | public | 2015 | Chicago, US | |
56 | ![]() | $38.45B | public | 1891 | Amsterdam, NL | |
57 | ![]() | $38.06B | public | 1982 | San Rafael, US | |
58 | ![]() | $36.59B | public | 1690 | London, GB | |
59 | ![]() | $36.55B | public | 1909 | New York, US | |
60 | ![]() | $36.37B | public | 1969 | Houston, US | |
61 | ![]() | $33.73B | public | 1994 | Paris, FR | |
62 | ![]() | $32.76B | public | 1995 | San Jose, US | |
63 | ![]() | $32.23B | public | 2005 | Houston, US | |
64 | ![]() | $31.69B | public | 1876 | Stockholm, SE | |
65 | ![]() | $31.11B | public | 1939 | Palo Alto, US | |
66 | ![]() | $30.79B | public | 2008 | Toronto, CA | |
67 | ![]() | $30.71B | public | 2006 | San Francisco, US | |
68 | ![]() | $29.88B | public | 1932 | Wallingford, US | |
69 | ![]() | $29.87B | public | 1846 | London, GB | |
70 | ![]() | $29.0B | public | 1865 | Espoo, FI | |
71 | ![]() | $27.45B | public | 1883 | Pittsburgh, US | |
72 | ![]() | $27.38B | public | 2016 | Durham, US | |
73 | ![]() | $25.12B | public | 1851 | Corning, US | |
74 | ![]() | $24.83B | public | 1999 | Santa Clara, US | |
75 | ![]() | $24.6B | public | 2006 | Stockholm, SE | |
76 | ![]() | $23.87B | public | 1989 | Chandler, US | |
77 | ![]() | $23.62B | public | 1928 | Chicago, US | |
78 | ![]() | $23.52B | public | 2005 | Santa Clara, US | |
79 | ![]() | $23.44B | public | 1971 | Jersey City, US | |
80 | ![]() | $23.23B | public | 1828 | London, GB | |
81 | ![]() | $23.18B | public | 1946 | Barcelona, ES | |
82 | ![]() | $22.93B | public | 2000 | Atlanta, US | |
83 | ![]() | $22.28B | public | 1979 | Kansas City, US | |
84 | ![]() | $21.83B | public | 1939 | Palo Alto, US | |
85 | ![]() | $21.54B | public | 1983 | Westbrook, US | |
86 | ![]() | $20.97B | public | 1903 | Milwaukee, US | |
87 | ![]() | $20.63B | public | 2007 | Pleasanton, US | |
88 | ![]() | $20.58B | public | 1979 | Las Rozas, ES | |
89 | ![]() | $20.29B | public | 1967 | Winona, US | |
90 | ![]() | $20.18B | public | 2004 | San Francisco, US | |
91 | ![]() | $20.05B | public | 1880 | Broomfield, US | |
92 | ![]() | $19.67B | public | 1988 | San Jose, US | |
93 | ![]() | $18.94B | public | 1989 | Columbus, US | |
94 | ![]() | $18.91B | public | 1996 | Bellevue, US | |
95 | ![]() | $18.69B | public | 1898 | Memphis, US | |
96 | ![]() | $18.43B | public | 1993 | San Carlos, US | |
97 | ![]() | $17.81B | public | 1991 | Talleyville, US | |
98 | ![]() | $17.66B | public | 1976 | Montréal, CA | |
99 | ![]() | $17.42B | public | 1906 | Los Angeles, US | |
100 | ![]() | $16.52B | public | 2008 | San Francisco, US |
What a surprise! Amazon company retakes second place here! The market cup of this company is over $960B, and a better entity was only Microsoft with $967B.
Learn more about our ranking using policy
5. The top companies in Spain by the number of stores
Next, to the online platforms and e-commerce solutions, companies provide their services by the stores they manage. In this paragraph, you will find the information about the biggest companies by the number of stores. There are both Spanish businesses like clothing company Inditex, and international entities, e.g., French AXA, Swiss-Swedish ABB or American Arrow Electronic. But which company takes the first place in the list of the top companies in Spain by a number of stores?
# | Name | Stores | Type | Founded | Headquarter | Links |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() | 17 | private | 1845 | New York, US | |
2 | ![]() | 17 | public | 1828 | London, GB | |
3 | ![]() | 16 | public | 1988 | Zürich, CH | |
4 | ![]() | 15 | private | 1987 | Amstelveen, NL | |
5 | ![]() | 10 | public | 1985 | Arteixo, ES | |
6 | ![]() | 10 | public | 1968 | Paris, FR | |
7 | ![]() | 10 | private | 1998 | Arazuri, ES | |
8 | ![]() | 9 | private | 1989 | Zamudio, ES | |
9 | ![]() | 8 | subsidiary | 1996 | Greater London, GB | |
10 | ![]() | 7 | public | 1886 | Stuttgart, DE | |
11 | ![]() | 6 | public | 1967 | Paris, FR | |
12 | ![]() | 6 | public | 1989 | Dublin 4, IE | |
13 | ![]() | 6 | private | 1983 | Johannesburg, ZA | |
14 | ![]() | 6 | public | 1935 | Englewood, US | |
15 | ![]() | 6 | public | 1919 | Mayfield Heights, US | |
16 | ![]() | 6 | public | 1985 | Barcelona, ES | |
17 | ![]() | 5 | public | 1985 | Paris, FR | |
18 | ![]() | 5 | public | 1876 | Düsseldorf, DE | |
19 | ![]() | 5 | public | 1892 | Wien, AT | |
20 | ![]() | 4 | public | 1884 | Atlanta, US | |
21 | ![]() | 4 | public | 1840 | Bilbo, ES | |
22 | ![]() | 4 | public | 1976 | West Berkshire, GB | |
23 | ![]() | 4 | private | 1994 | Greater London, GB | |
24 | ![]() | 3 | public | 1994 | Paris, FR | |
25 | ![]() | 3 | public | 1977 | Redwood City, US | |
26 | ![]() | 3 | public | 1968 | Santa Clara, US | |
27 | ![]() | 3 | public | 1976 | Montréal, CA | |
28 | ![]() | 3 | public | 1893 | Paris, FR | |
29 | ![]() | 3 | public | 1939 | Palo Alto, US | |
30 | ![]() | 3 | public | 1939 | Palo Alto, US | |
31 | ![]() | 3 | public | 1906 | Los Angeles, US | |
32 | ![]() | 3 | public | 2008 | Toronto, CA | |
33 | ![]() | 3 | public | 1994 | Detroit, US | |
34 | ![]() | 3 | private | 1965 | Cambridge, US | |
35 | ![]() | 3 | public | 1903 | Milwaukee, US | |
36 | ![]() | 3 | public | 1996 | Sada, ES | |
37 | ![]() | 3 | public | 1902 | Heerlen, NL | |
38 | ![]() | 3 | public | 1991 | Waterloo, CA | |
39 | ![]() | 3 | public | 1924 | Downers Grove, US | |
40 | ![]() | 3 | public | 1978 | Atlanta, US | |
41 | ![]() | 3 | public | 1888 | Pittsburgh, US | |
42 | ![]() | 3 | public | 1992 | Burlington, US | |
43 | ![]() | 3 | private | Alcobendas, ES | ||
44 | ![]() | 3 | public | 1833 | New York, US | |
45 | ![]() | 3 | private | 1969 | Hemel Hempstead, GB | |
46 | ![]() | 3 | subsidiary | 1932 | New York, US | |
47 | ![]() | 3 | private | 1934 | Nürnberg, DE | |
48 | ![]() | 3 | private | 2009 | London, GB | |
49 | ![]() | 3 | private | 2013 | Madrid, ES | |
50 | ![]() | 3 | subsidiary | 2011 | Bilbo, ES | |
51 | ![]() | 3 | private | 2016 | Barcelona, ES | |
52 | ![]() | 3 | private | 2000 | Madrid, ES | |
53 | ![]() | 3 | subsidiary | 1996 | Logroño, ES | |
54 | ![]() | 3 | subsidiary | 1983 | Albelda de Iregua, ES | |
55 | ![]() | 3 | subsidiary | 2010 | Madrid, ES | |
56 | ![]() | 2 | public | 1866 | Vevey, CH | |
57 | ![]() | 2 | private | 1886 | Gerlingen, DE | |
58 | ![]() | 2 | public | 1911 | Armonk, US | |
59 | ![]() | 2 | public | 1904 | Charlotte, US | |
60 | ![]() | 2 | public | 2008 | Leuven, BE | |
61 | ![]() | 2 | public | 1924 | Madrid, ES | |
62 | ![]() | 2 | public | 1946 | Tokyo, JP | |
63 | ![]() | 2 | public | 1986 | Pune, IN | |
64 | ![]() | 2 | private | 1865 | Minneapolis, US | |
65 | ![]() | 2 | public | 1990 | Los Angeles, US | |
66 | ![]() | 2 | public | 2016 | Plymouth, US | |
67 | ![]() | 2 | public | 1972 | Newtown Square, US | |
68 | ![]() | 2 | public | 1942 | Montréal, CA | |
69 | ![]() | 2 | public | 2005 | Pantin, FR | |
70 | ![]() | 2 | public | 1953 | Stockholm, SE | |
71 | ![]() | 2 | subsidiary | 1759 | Redditch, GB | |
72 | ![]() | 2 | public | 1923 | Naperville, US | |
73 | ![]() | 2 | public | 1883 | Pittsburgh, US | |
74 | ![]() | 2 | public | 1923 | New York, US | |
75 | ![]() | 2 | public | 1888 | New York, US | |
76 | ![]() | 2 | private | 1926 | New York, US | |
77 | ![]() | 2 | public | 1888 | Amsterdam, NL | |
78 | ![]() | 2 | public | 2002 | Bilbo, ES | |
79 | ![]() | 2 | private | 1963 | Boston, US | |
80 | ![]() | 2 | public | 1982 | San Jose, US | |
81 | ![]() | 2 | subsidiary | 1979 | Irvine, US | |
82 | ![]() | 2 | public | 1880 | Broomfield, US | |
83 | ![]() | 2 | public | 1792 | Bloomfield, US | |
84 | ![]() | 2 | public | 1966 | Harrison, US | |
85 | ![]() | 2 | public | 1915 | Tokyo , JP | |
86 | ![]() | 2 | public | 1906 | Freienbach, CH | |
87 | ![]() | 2 | subsidiary | 1993 | Raleigh, US | |
88 | ![]() | 2 | public | 1979 | Stamford, US | |
89 | ![]() | 2 | public | 1929 | Chicago, US | |
90 | ![]() | 2 | public | 2005 | Pleasanton, US | |
91 | ![]() | 2 | public | 1982 | San Rafael, US | |
92 | ![]() | 2 | public | 1895 | Hagalund, SE | |
93 | ![]() | 2 | public | 1947 | Saint-Laurent, CA | |
94 | ![]() | 2 | subsidiary | 2015 | Berlin, DE | |
95 | ![]() | 2 | public | 1866 | København, DK | |
96 | ![]() | 2 | public | 1875 | Sydney, AU | |
97 | ![]() | 2 | public | Sevilla, ES | ||
98 | ![]() | 2 | subsidiary | 1880 | Oxford, GB | |
99 | ![]() | 2 | public | 1895 | Cleveland, US | |
100 | ![]() | 2 | public | 2003 | Luxembourg, LU |
Does it come to your mind that a famous company from The Big Four, Deloitte, would be the winner here? This business specializes in conducting financial audits, and besides its stores in France, the company operates in over 100 locations.
6. The biggest Spain companies by the number of employees
Another view of the companies in Spain is connected with the number of employees they hire. When the business develops and reaches new areas, it is generally related to creating new jobs. Ranking presents such popular businesses as (mentioned on earlier lists) Amazon with 630600 employees, Compass Group with a score of 600000 and Accenture in the third place.
# | Name | Employees | Type | Founded | Headquarter | Links |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() | 630600 | public | 1994 | Seattle, US | |
2 | ![]() | 600000 | public | 1941 | Surrey, GB | |
3 | ![]() | 459000 | public | 1989 | Dublin 4, IE | |
4 | ![]() | 417929 | public | 1968 | Mumbai, IN | |
5 | ![]() | 410000 | private | 1886 | Gerlingen, DE | |
6 | ![]() | 379000 | public | 1847 | München, DE | |
7 | ![]() | 350600 | public | 1911 | Armonk, US | |
8 | ![]() | 345000 | public | 1934 | Kungsholmen, SE | |
9 | ![]() | 323000 | public | 1866 | Vevey, CH | |
10 | ![]() | 320000 | public | 1960 | Ann Arbor, US | |
11 | ![]() | 305289 | public | 1910 | Tokyo, JP | |
12 | ![]() | 300367 | public | 1886 | Stuttgart, DE | |
13 | ![]() | 291000 | public | 1971 | Seattle, US | |
14 | ![]() | 281600 | public | 1994 | Paris, FR | |
15 | ![]() | 276973 | private | 1989 | London, GB | |
16 | ![]() | 273858 | public | 1918 | Kadoma, JP | |
17 | ![]() | 268000 | public | 1876 | Dallas, US | |
18 | ![]() | 263900 | private | 1845 | New York, US | |
19 | ![]() | 250930 | private | 1998 | London, GB | |
20 | ![]() | 215675 | public | 1995 | Bonn, DE | |
21 | ![]() | 211313 | public | 1967 | Paris, FR | |
22 | ![]() | 210000 | public | 1955 | Oak Brook, US | |
23 | ![]() | 205000 | public | 1904 | Charlotte, US | |
24 | ![]() | 204107 | public | 1981 | Bengaluru, IN | |
25 | ![]() | 204000 | public | 1812 | New York, US | |
26 | ![]() | 202713 | public | 1857 | Madrid, ES | |
27 | ![]() | 200000 | public | 1969 | Singapore, SG | |
28 | ![]() | 193279 | private | 1987 | Amstelveen, NL | |
29 | ![]() | 181527 | public | 1997 | Madrid, ES | |
30 | ![]() | 181001 | public | 1665 | Courbevoie, FR | |
31 | ![]() | 180000 | private | 1987 | Shenzhen, CN | |
32 | ![]() | 174386 | public | 1985 | Arteixo, ES | |
33 | ![]() | 172603 | public | 2008 | Leuven, BE | |
34 | ![]() | 161659 | subsidiary | 1998 | Mountain View, US | |
35 | ![]() | 160566 | public | 1929 | London, GB | |
36 | ![]() | 155000 | private | 1865 | Minneapolis, US | |
37 | ![]() | 153124 | public | 1836 | Rueil-Malmaison, FR | |
38 | ![]() | 149031 | public | 1993 | Paris, FR | |
39 | ![]() | 146600 | public | 1988 | Zürich, CH | |
40 | ![]() | 142340 | public | 1921 | Tokyo, JP | |
41 | ![]() | 141256 | public | 1875 | Minato-ku, JP | |
42 | ![]() | 140365 | public | 1935 | Minato, JP | |
43 | ![]() | 137000 | public | 1977 | Redwood City, US | |
44 | ![]() | 133671 | public | 1970 | Leiden, NL | |
45 | ![]() | 131000 | public | 1975 | Redmond, US | |
46 | ![]() | 128584 | public | 1999 | Essen, DE | |
47 | ![]() | 125627 | public | 1857 | Bilbao, ES | |
48 | ![]() | 121597 | public | 1996 | Basel, CH | |
49 | ![]() | 120138 | public | 1924 | Madrid, ES | |
50 | ![]() | 118391 | public | 1986 | Pune, IN | |
51 | ![]() | 118006 | public | 1967 | Tokyo, JP | |
52 | ![]() | 117300 | public | 1946 | Tokyo, JP | |
53 | ![]() | 115686 | public | 1997 | Nanterre, FR | |
54 | ![]() | 114000 | public | 1906 | Morris Plains, US | |
55 | ![]() | 111588 | public | 1985 | Paris, FR | |
56 | ![]() | 111100 | public | 1889 | Clermont-Ferrand, FR | |
57 | ![]() | 108800 | public | 1968 | Santa Clara, US | |
58 | ![]() | 107554 | public | 1983 | Kyoto, JP | |
59 | ![]() | 105800 | public | 1846 | London, GB | |
60 | ![]() | 103000 | public | 1865 | Espoo, FI | |
61 | ![]() | 102883 | public | 1935 | Tokyo, JP | |
62 | ![]() | 100735 | public | 1876 | Stockholm, SE | |
63 | ![]() | 97878 | public | 1936 | Yokohama-shi, JP | |
64 | ![]() | 97368 | public | 1878 | Genève, CH | |
65 | ![]() | 96498 | public | 1972 | Newtown Square, US | |
66 | ![]() | 95978 | public | 1952 | Madrid, ES | |
67 | ![]() | 92639 | public | 2005 | Pantin, FR | |
68 | ![]() | 92000 | public | 1837 | Cincinnati, US | |
69 | ![]() | 90200 | public | 1849 | New York, US | |
70 | ![]() | 90147 | public | 1917 | Nürnberg, DE | |
71 | ![]() | 87000 | public | 1990 | Los Angeles, US | |
72 | ![]() | 85000 | public | 2016 | Plymouth, US | |
73 | ![]() | 83500 | public | 1690 | London, GB | |
74 | ![]() | 82606 | public | 1909 | Clichy, FR | |
75 | ![]() | 82000 | public | 1907 | Den Haag, NL | |
76 | ![]() | 81000 | public | 2015 | Zürich, CH | |
77 | ![]() | 80000 | public | 1906 | Los Angeles, US | |
78 | ![]() | 77739 | public | 1934 | Tokyo, JP | |
79 | ![]() | 77400 | public | 1891 | Amsterdam, NL | |
80 | ![]() | 77164 | public | 1950 | Chiyoda-ku, JP | |
81 | ![]() | 75876 | public | 1890 | Las Condes, CL | |
82 | ![]() | 75326 | public | 1944 | Nagaokakyo, JP | |
83 | ![]() | 75000 | subsidiary | 1985 | Miami, US | |
84 | ![]() | 74570 | public | 1984 | Qingdao, CN | |
85 | ![]() | 74400 | public | 1947 | Dallas, US | |
86 | ![]() | 74200 | public | 1984 | San Jose, US | |
87 | ![]() | 74000 | public | 1976 | Montréal, CA | |
88 | ![]() | 73800 | public | 1792 | Bloomfield, US | |
89 | ![]() | 73773 | public | 1958 | Seoul, KR | |
90 | ![]() | 73600 | public | 1932 | Wallingford, US | |
91 | ![]() | 72709 | subsidiary | 1979 | Hopkinton, US | |
92 | ![]() | 70263 | public | 1924 | Osaka, JP | |
93 | ![]() | 68388 | subsidiary | 1947 | Duisburg, DE | |
94 | ![]() | 67000 | public | 1922 | Waltham, US | |
95 | ![]() | 67000 | public | 1969 | Houston, US | |
96 | ![]() | 67000 | public | 1849 | Charenton-le-Pont, FR | |
97 | ![]() | 66000 | public | 1893 | Paris, FR | |
98 | ![]() | 65000 | public | 1902 | Paris, FR | |
99 | ![]() | 64010 | public | 1942 | Montréal, CA | |
100 | ![]() | 63299 | public | 1919 | Tokyo, JP |
Moreover, businesses like Bosh, Domino’s Pizza, Nestle, or Starbucks also hire a big number of people for different positions – from the managing team to the technical workers. And do you know that Siemens generally joins around 377000 employees in more than 200 regions?
Check out how we get data for our rankings
7. Spain company – the best place to work list
Going to work with pleasure is something that every employee wants. This is why in this article we look at the biggest companies in Spain by the employee’s perspective and check what they think about the working conditions there. The respondents could rate the culture and value issues and the border between work and life. Look at the businesses and check what is the place to work in.
# | Name | Votes | Ratings | Culture & values | Work/life balance | Type | Headquarter | Links |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() | 10161 | 4.5 | 4.5 | 4.4 | public | Newtown Square, US | |
2 | ![]() | 4965 | 4.4 | 4.6 | 4.2 | public | San Francisco, US | |
3 | ![]() | 8609 | 4.4 | 4.4 | 4.1 | subsidiary | Mountain View, US | |
4 | ![]() | 21925 | 4.1 | 4.0 | 3.9 | public | Redmond, US | |
5 | ![]() | 8044 | 4.1 | 4.2 | 4.2 | public | Espoo, FI | |
6 | ![]() | 16536 | 4.0 | 4.1 | 4.1 | public | San Jose, US | |
7 | ![]() | 7062 | 4.0 | 3.8 | 4.0 | public | München, DE | |
8 | ![]() | 4294 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 3.7 | public | London, GB | |
9 | ![]() | 12644 | 3.9 | 3.8 | 3.8 | public | Santa Clara, US | |
10 | ![]() | 42120 | 3.9 | 3.9 | 3.4 | public | Dublin 4, IE | |
11 | ![]() | 4405 | 3.9 | 3.9 | 3.8 | public | Rueil-Malmaison, FR | |
12 | ![]() | 4365 | 3.9 | 3.8 | 3.8 | public | Den Haag, NL | |
13 | ![]() | 3307 | 3.9 | 3.8 | 3.8 | public | New York, US | |
14 | ![]() | 5949 | 3.9 | 3.8 | 2.9 | public | New York, US | |
15 | ![]() | 2048 | 3.9 | 4.2 | 4.0 | public | Palo Alto, US | |
16 | ![]() | 6 | 3.84 | 3.5 | 3.8 | public | Stuttgart, DE | |
17 | ![]() | 21269 | 3.8 | 4.0 | 3.5 | public | Seattle, US | |
18 | ![]() | 1422 | 3.8 | 3.7 | 3.5 | public | Düsseldorf, DE | |
19 | ![]() | 27837 | 3.8 | 3.8 | 3.0 | private | New York, US | |
20 | ![]() | 1444 | 3.8 | 3.7 | 3.9 | public | London, GB | |
21 | ![]() | 513 | 3.8 | 3.8 | 3.7 | public | Clermont-Ferrand, FR | |
22 | ![]() | 3224 | 3.7 | 3.6 | 3.5 | public | Los Angeles, US | |
23 | ![]() | 2121 | 3.7 | 3.7 | 3.2 | private | Chicago, US | |
24 | ![]() | 10814 | 3.7 | 3.2 | 3.2 | public | Pune, IN | |
25 | ![]() | 2718 | 3.7 | 3.7 | 3.6 | subsidiary | Miami, US | |
26 | ![]() | 2872 | 3.7 | 3.5 | 3.5 | public | Basel, CH | |
27 | ![]() | 1690 | 3.7 | 3.8 | 3.7 | public | Midland, US | |
28 | ![]() | 2947 | 3.7 | 3.7 | 3.3 | public | Vevey, CH | |
29 | ![]() | 7198 | 3.7 | 3.9 | 3.5 | public | New York, US | |
30 | ![]() | 36524 | 3.7 | 3.8 | 3.7 | public | Mumbai, IN | |
31 | ![]() | 378 | 3.7 | 3.6 | 3.4 | public | Espoo, FI | |
32 | ![]() | 1299 | 3.7 | 3.7 | 4.0 | public | Plan-les-Ouates, CH | |
33 | ![]() | 21154 | 3.6 | 3.5 | 3.5 | public | Charlotte, US | |
34 | ![]() | 792 | 3.6 | 3.7 | 3.8 | public | Pantin, FR | |
35 | ![]() | 28271 | 3.6 | 3.5 | 3.4 | public | Paris, FR | |
36 | ![]() | 3637 | 3.6 | 3.5 | 3.7 | public | Waltham, US | |
37 | ![]() | 138 | 3.6 | 3.3 | 3.5 | public | Chiyoda-ku, JP | |
38 | ![]() | 44000 | 3.6 | 3.6 | 3.7 | public | Armonk, US | |
39 | ![]() | 787 | 3.6 | 3.7 | 3.7 | public | Corning, US | |
40 | ![]() | 4921 | 3.6 | 3.5 | 3.4 | public | Atlanta, US | |
41 | ![]() | 463 | 3.6 | 3.5 | 3.7 | public | Bonn, DE | |
42 | ![]() | 944 | 3.6 | 3.6 | 3.5 | public | Singapore, SG | |
43 | ![]() | 2840 | 3.6 | 3.6 | 3.6 | public | Zürich, CH | |
44 | ![]() | 29 | 3.6 | 3.5 | 3.9 | public | Nagaokakyo, JP | |
45 | ![]() | 1785 | 3.6 | 3.4 | 3.6 | public | Paris, FR | |
46 | ![]() | 6885 | 3.6 | 3.2 | 3.2 | public | Morris Plains, US | |
47 | ![]() | 8967 | 3.5 | 3.5 | 3.7 | public | Palo Alto, US | |
48 | ![]() | 26 | 3.5 | 3.2 | 3.1 | public | Qingdao, CN | |
49 | ![]() | 2679 | 3.5 | 3.5 | 3.5 | public | Dallas, US | |
50 | ![]() | 4258 | 3.5 | 3.7 | 3.7 | public | Amsterdam, NL | |
51 | ![]() | 92 | 3.5 | 3.3 | 3.3 | public | Chiyoda, JP | |
52 | ![]() | 14418 | 3.5 | 3.5 | 3.3 | public | New York, US | |
53 | ![]() | 371 | 3.5 | 3.5 | 3.6 | public | Stockholm, SE | |
54 | ![]() | 8855 | 3.5 | 3.8 | 3.9 | public | Stockholm, SE | |
55 | ![]() | 182 | 3.5 | 3.0 | 3.0 | public | Kyoto, JP | |
56 | ![]() | 4430 | 3.5 | 3.7 | 3.4 | public | New York, US | |
57 | ![]() | 3667 | 3.4 | 3.3 | 3.4 | public | Durham, US | |
58 | ![]() | 395 | 3.4 | 3.2 | 3.2 | public | Stockholm, SE | |
59 | ![]() | 846 | 3.4 | 3.3 | 2.8 | public | Memphis, US | |
60 | ![]() | 6191 | 3.4 | 3.4 | 3.6 | public | Montréal, CA | |
61 | ![]() | 3760 | 3.4 | 3.2 | 3.0 | public | Ann Arbor, US | |
62 | ![]() | 21890 | 3.4 | 3.2 | 3.8 | public | Redwood City, US | |
63 | ![]() | 1007 | 3.4 | 3.5 | 3.5 | public | Kadoma, JP | |
64 | ![]() | 799 | 3.3 | 3.1 | 3.4 | public | Essen, DE | |
65 | ![]() | 91 | 3.3 | 3.0 | 3.3 | public | Kyoto, JP | |
66 | ![]() | 3384 | 3.3 | 3.8 | 3.4 | private | Delft, NL | |
67 | ![]() | 1537 | 3.3 | 3.5 | 3.1 | public | Naperville, US | |
68 | ![]() | 22618 | 3.3 | 3.1 | 3.2 | public | Oak Brook, US | |
69 | ![]() | 1375 | 3.3 | 3.1 | 3.2 | public | Surrey, GB | |
70 | ![]() | 32959 | 3.3 | 3.8 | 3.5 | public | Bengaluru, IN | |
71 | ![]() | 1365 | 3.3 | 3.1 | 2.7 | public | Slough, GB | |
72 | ![]() | 14470 | 3.3 | 3.3 | 3.3 | public | Paris, FR | |
73 | ![]() | 269 | 3.3 | 3.0 | 3.1 | public | Zürich, CH | |
74 | ![]() | 799 | 3.3 | 3.0 | 3.1 | public | München, DE | |
75 | ![]() | 1951 | 3.3 | 3.0 | 3.2 | public | Zürich, CH | |
76 | ![]() | 901 | 3.3 | 3.5 | 3.4 | public | Paris, FR | |
77 | ![]() | 3221 | 3.3 | 3.3 | 3.5 | public | New York, US | |
78 | ![]() | 2831 | 3.2 | 3.1 | 3.1 | public | Atlanta, US | |
79 | ![]() | 754 | 3.2 | 3.0 | 2.9 | public | Tokyo, JP | |
80 | ![]() | 1272 | 3.2 | 2.9 | 2.8 | public | Seoul, KR | |
81 | ![]() | 168 | 3.2 | 3.2 | 3.0 | public | Osaka, JP | |
82 | ![]() | 1625 | 3.2 | 3.3 | 3.6 | public | Paris, FR | |
83 | ![]() | 113 | 3.2 | 3.1 | 3.2 | public | Nürnberg, DE | |
84 | ![]() | 791 | 3.2 | 3.0 | 2.9 | public | Atlanta, US | |
85 | ![]() | 214 | 3.2 | 3.0 | 3.1 | public | Wallingford, US | |
86 | ![]() | 4443 | 3.1 | 3.0 | 3.3 | public | Los Angeles, US | |
87 | ![]() | 1390 | 3.1 | 3.1 | 2.5 | public | Leuven, BE | |
88 | ![]() | 319 | 3.1 | 2.9 | 2.6 | public | Arteixo, ES | |
89 | ![]() | 204 | 3.1 | 3.0 | 3.1 | public | Plymouth, US | |
90 | ![]() | 2583 | 3.1 | 3.2 | 3.4 | public | Minato, JP | |
91 | ![]() | 1744 | 3.1 | 2.9 | 3.3 | public | Montréal, CA | |
92 | ![]() | 742 | 3.1 | 2.7 | 2.9 | subsidiary | Duisburg, DE | |
93 | ![]() | 144 | 3.0 | 2.8 | 2.7 | public | Madrid, ES | |
94 | ![]() | 888 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 3.2 | public | Genève, CH | |
95 | ![]() | 519 | 3.0 | 2.7 | 2.8 | subsidiary | Redditch, GB | |
96 | ![]() | 240 | 3.0 | 2.8 | 2.9 | public | Tokyo, JP | |
97 | ![]() | 213 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 3.3 | public | Tokyo, JP | |
98 | ![]() | 2673 | 2.9 | 3.0 | 3.1 | public | Madrid, ES | |
99 | ![]() | 917 | 2.9 | 2.9 | 3.3 | public | Yokohama-shi, JP | |
100 | ![]() | 1350 | 2.8 | 2.6 | 2.6 | public | Kungsholmen, SE |
The profile below presents international companies with the SAP company on the top. This is a German entity that globally leads in the software and programming industry. What is interesting, every month SAP company chooses and publishes the Member of the Month Hall of Fame on its website, so the employee can feel honored and appreciated.
8. Summary
The list of companies in Spain is significantly longer than the sum of businesses mentioned on the lists above. This country has faced with the crisis and has been still restructuring its economies. In connection with industrial and legal operations, changes also occurring in companies’ strategies and resources. Therefore, every Spanish manufacturer (or that foreign one) must follow the regulations and react to a business environment. It is unequivocally related to the company’s data modification. You should not be worried about the state of play these businesses – on Datantify database website you can get only current information. We hope it will be useful and you find the companies in matters which interest you.

with active e-mails, phone numbers
and more
[…] you could conduct a transaction. No doubt you have heard about more global marketplaces such as Rakuten, eBay, Alibaba, and AliExpress. Using of its services can lead to conquering international markets […]
[…] countries give us an array of possibilities to do. We are able not only to travel abroad but also start an international business. It is a good idea for people who want to expand into global markets, reach a new segment of […]
[…] Read also our previous article:Top 40 companies of ASX by market cap https://datantify.com/knowledge/top-40-companies-of-asx-by-market-cap/ […]
[…] Read also our previous article: TOP 50 Largest Financial Companies in the World in 2020https://datantify.com/knowledge/top-50-largest-financial-companies-in-the-world-in-2020/ […]