Top Companies in Sweden by Revenue, Market cap and More [2019 Edition]
Sweden is a country in which economy bases on exporting goods such as chemicals, motor vehicles, paper products, and military armaments. Its gross domestic product (GDP) per capita has the highest level in the EU, and the primary Swedish industries include the automotive sector, telecommunications, timber, and hydropower. Looking back, the country went through the economic crisis in the early ‘90s and presently is presented as an example of a competitive and dynamic economy. The effects of strong position are closely related to companies in Sweden, and in the paper below, we set out those big entities.
1. Introduction
Swedish companies are known all over the world. Have you heard about household appliances leader Electrolux? Or maybe your closet is bursting with H&M clothes? Naturally, many other businesses are operating in Sweden – not only from the native regions. But just because of their services, products sales, and issued shares, the economy of this country can continually grow. This factor-induced us to create some lists of the biggest companies in Sweden and present you who is the giant in a particular ranking. Here we go!
2. Quick summary
List of the Sweden companies mentioned in the article is divided into five different views. Reading this text, you can see which company gets the highest revenue and has the highest number of employees. Furthermore, there is also information about the market capitalization and number of stores. The last paragraph is given for places, where the employees like working the most. Guess the individual positions and check if you know the largest Swedish companies so well.
3. The top companies in Sweden by revenue
It is nothing strange that companies try to find a way to increase their revenues. That’s one of the major businesses’ purposes. Dictionaries define it as money which is received to the company from selling services and products. For better understanding the matter, let’s look at the example: revenue for the construction and erection firm would be an amount of money they get from its building services. While on the subject, in the list below, you can find businesses which operate in this area. For instance, development group Skanska – one of the major Swedish companies building their skyscrapers in different parts of the world. Despite the popularity of this company, it is not our number one in the presented list. So, who can show its revenue off?
# | Name | Revenue | Type | Founded | Headquarter | Links |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() | $311.87B | public | 1907 | Den Haag, NL | |
2 | ![]() | $232.89B | public | 1994 | Seattle, US | |
3 | ![]() | $170.76B | public | 1876 | Dallas, US | |
4 | ![]() | $148.9B | public | 1985 | Paris, FR | |
5 | ![]() | $121.61B | public | 1892 | Boston, US | |
6 | ![]() | $110.58B | public | 1904 | Charlotte, US | |
7 | ![]() | $110.48B | public | 1916 | München, DE | |
8 | ![]() | $110.36B | public | 1975 | Redmond, US | |
9 | ![]() | $92.98B | public | 1847 | München, DE | |
10 | ![]() | $88.26B | public | 1866 | Vevey, CH | |
11 | ![]() | $77.81B | public | 1946 | Tokyo, JP | |
12 | ![]() | $74.99B | subsidiary | 1998 | Mountain View, US | |
13 | ![]() | $72.69B | public | 1918 | Kadoma, JP | |
14 | ![]() | $70.85B | public | 1968 | Santa Clara, US | |
15 | ![]() | $68.91B | public | 1950 | Chiyoda-ku, JP | |
16 | ![]() | $58.73B | public | 1969 | Houston, US | |
17 | ![]() | $58.47B | public | 1939 | Palo Alto, US | |
18 | ![]() | $55.84B | public | 2004 | Menlo Park, US | |
19 | ![]() | $53.65B | public | 1849 | New York, US | |
20 | ![]() | $51.89B | public | 1958 | Seoul, KR | |
21 | ![]() | $49.33B | public | 1984 | San Jose, US | |
22 | ![]() | $49.11B | public | 1996 | Basel, CH | |
23 | ![]() | $43.03B | subsidiary | 1979 | Irvine, US | |
24 | ![]() | $41.8B | public | 1906 | Morris Plains, US | |
25 | ![]() | $41.6B | public | 1989 | Dublin 4, IE | |
26 | ![]() | $40.9B | public | 1921 | Tokyo, JP | |
27 | ![]() | $39.83B | public | 1977 | Redwood City, US | |
28 | ![]() | $36.4B | public | 1972 | Beaverton, US | |
29 | ![]() | $35.99B | public | 1935 | Minato, JP | |
30 | ![]() | $34.7B | public | 1927 | Göteborg, SE | |
31 | ![]() | $31.4B | public | 1885 | Glendale, US | |
32 | ![]() | $30.85B | public | 1939 | Palo Alto, US | |
33 | ![]() | $29.68B | public | 1935 | Englewood, US | |
34 | ![]() | $28.37B | public | 1985 | Arteixo, ES | |
35 | ![]() | $28.13B | public | 1853 | Paris, FR | |
36 | ![]() | $27.7B | public | 1836 | Rueil-Malmaison, FR | |
37 | ![]() | $26.49B | public | 1996 | Zürich, CH | |
38 | ![]() | $26.27B | public | 1972 | Newtown Square, US | |
39 | ![]() | $26.23B | public | 2015 | Chicago, US | |
40 | ![]() | $25.9B | public | 1899 | Tokyo, JP | |
41 | ![]() | $25.44B | public | 1969 | Singapore, SG | |
42 | ![]() | $24.7B | subsidiary | 1979 | Hopkinton, US | |
43 | ![]() | $24.59B | public | 1802 | Wilmington, US | |
44 | ![]() | $23.52B | public | 1902 | Paris, FR | |
45 | ![]() | $23.17B | public | 1997 | Nanterre, FR | |
46 | ![]() | $22.73B | public | 1985 | San Diego, US | |
47 | ![]() | $22.42B | public | 1876 | Düsseldorf, DE | |
48 | ![]() | $21.81B | public | 1988 | Irving, US | |
49 | ![]() | $21.19B | public | 1884 | London, GB | |
50 | ![]() | $20.86B | public | 1876 | Stockholm, SE | |
51 | ![]() | $20.73B | public | 1947 | Stockholm, SE | |
52 | ![]() | $20.16B | public | 1990 | Los Angeles, US | |
53 | ![]() | $18.35B | public | 1817 | London, GB | |
54 | ![]() | $18.28B | public | 1890 | Las Condes, CL | |
55 | ![]() | $17.75B | public | 1893 | Paris, FR | |
56 | ![]() | $17.59B | public | 1968 | Mumbai, IN | |
57 | ![]() | $17.44B | public | 2016 | Plymouth, US | |
58 | ![]() | $16.8B | public | 1887 | Stockholm, SE | |
59 | ![]() | $16.37B | public | 1823 | Slough, GB | |
60 | ![]() | $16.24B | public | 1942 | Montréal, CA | |
61 | ![]() | $16.12B | public | 1994 | Paris, FR | |
62 | ![]() | $15.47B | public | 1898 | Akron, US | |
63 | ![]() | $14.98B | public | 1947 | Dallas, US | |
64 | ![]() | $13.6B | public | 1941 | Portage, US | |
65 | ![]() | $13.28B | public | 1999 | San Francisco, US | |
66 | ![]() | $12.87B | public | 1919 | Stockholm, SE | |
67 | ![]() | $12.56B | subsidiary | 1759 | Redditch, GB | |
68 | ![]() | $12.38B | public | 2016 | Uxbridge, GB | |
69 | ![]() | $12.07B | public | 1873 | Nacka, SE | |
70 | ![]() | $11.89B | public | Stockholm, SE | ||
71 | ![]() | $11.8B | public | 1981 | Bengaluru, IN | |
72 | ![]() | $11.63B | public | 1880 | Broomfield, US | |
73 | ![]() | $11.44B | public | 1907 | Danbury, US | |
74 | ![]() | $9.66B | public | 1987 | Plan-les-Ouates, CH | |
75 | ![]() | $9.61B | public | 1889 | Kyoto, JP | |
76 | ![]() | $9.42B | public | 1862 | Stockholm, SE | |
77 | ![]() | $9.39B | public | 2003 | Tokyo, JP | |
78 | ![]() | $9.38B | public | 1970 | The Woodlands, US | |
79 | ![]() | $9.03B | public | 1982 | San Jose, US | |
80 | ![]() | $8.68B | public | 1953 | Stockholm, SE | |
81 | ![]() | $8.63B | public | 1924 | Downers Grove, US | |
82 | ![]() | $8.51B | public | 1999 | Neubiberg, DE | |
83 | ![]() | $8.42B | public | 1968 | Jacksonville, US | |
84 | ![]() | $8.4B | public | 1957 | Glenview, US | |
85 | ![]() | $8.2B | public | 1932 | Wallingford, US | |
86 | ![]() | $8.08B | public | 1907 | Göteborg, SE | |
87 | ![]() | $7.89B | public | 1994 | Stockholm, SE | |
88 | ![]() | $7.83B | public | 1933 | Kyoto, JP | |
89 | ![]() | $7.8B | public | 1918 | Osaka, JP | |
90 | ![]() | $7.78B | public | 1945 | Bengaluru, IN | |
91 | ![]() | $7.34B | public | 1928 | Chicago, US | |
92 | ![]() | $7.13B | public | 1994 | Courbevoie, FR | |
93 | ![]() | $7.11B | public | 1980 | San Jose, US | |
94 | ![]() | $6.91B | subsidiary | 1980 | Stamford, US | |
95 | ![]() | $6.67B | public | 1903 | Milwaukee, US | |
96 | ![]() | $6.49B | public | 1908 | Nagoya, JP | |
97 | ![]() | $6.27B | public | 1995 | Muttenz, CH | |
98 | ![]() | $6.08B | public | 1954 | Medina, US | |
99 | ![]() | $5.89B | public | 2006 | Stockholm, SE | |
100 | ![]() | $5.38B | public | 1959 | Tokyo, JP |
The first place goes to the business with more than $311B in revenue. Shell company has operated on the market since 1907, and surely you know it for oil and gas services. On the second position, there is an Amazon group and the podium is closed by AT&T company with the revenue over $170B.
See also: Top Companies in the USA by Revenue, Market Cap and More
4. The top Sweden companies by market capitalization
The next thing we pay our attention is the market capitalization of the individual company.
This is also called “market cap” which is a result of multiplying the stock price by the company’s outstanding shares. This figure shows the value of the company, which is taken into consideration by every investor. In this list, we point the largest companies by market capitalization. Let’s look at these businesses which get the highest scores here:
# | Name | Market cap. | Type | Founded | Headquarter | Links |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() | $967.12B | public | 1975 | Redmond, US | |
2 | ![]() | $960.32B | public | 1994 | Seattle, US | |
3 | ![]() | $553.43B | public | 2004 | Menlo Park, US | |
4 | ![]() | $289.71B | public | 1904 | Charlotte, US | |
5 | ![]() | $253.26B | public | 1966 | Harrison, US | |
6 | ![]() | $241.85B | public | 1984 | San Jose, US | |
7 | ![]() | $229.79B | public | 1849 | New York, US | |
8 | ![]() | $229.31B | public | 1968 | Santa Clara, US | |
9 | ![]() | $224.02B | public | 1876 | Dallas, US | |
10 | ![]() | $203.46B | public | 1999 | London, GB | |
11 | ![]() | $187.25B | public | 1977 | Redwood City, US | |
12 | ![]() | $162.82B | public | 1812 | New York, US | |
13 | ![]() | $152.07B | public | 1972 | Newtown Square, US | |
14 | ![]() | $136.45B | public | 1982 | San Jose, US | |
15 | ![]() | $134.02B | public | 1972 | Beaverton, US | |
16 | ![]() | $128.89B | public | 1998 | San Jose, US | |
17 | ![]() | $125.9B | public | 1999 | San Francisco, US | |
18 | ![]() | $125.62B | public | 1906 | Morris Plains, US | |
19 | ![]() | $112.42B | public | 1989 | Dublin 4, IE | |
20 | ![]() | $108.07B | public | 1985 | San Diego, US | |
21 | ![]() | $91.57B | public | 1892 | Boston, US | |
22 | ![]() | $81.05B | public | 1935 | New York, US | |
23 | ![]() | $76.11B | public | 1869 | New York, US | |
24 | ![]() | $75.01B | public | 1988 | New York, US | |
25 | ![]() | $72.89B | public | 1802 | Wilmington, US | |
26 | ![]() | $71.29B | public | 1941 | Portage, US | |
27 | ![]() | $65.87B | public | 1929 | London, GB | |
28 | ![]() | $65.35B | public | 1946 | Tokyo, JP | |
29 | ![]() | $62.7B | public | 1836 | Rueil-Malmaison, FR | |
30 | ![]() | $54.84B | public | 1986 | Dublin, IE | |
31 | ![]() | $53.15B | public | 1923 | Naperville, US | |
32 | ![]() | $49.81B | public | 2004 | Santa Clara, US | |
33 | ![]() | $47.31B | public | 1907 | Danbury, US | |
34 | ![]() | $45.22B | public | 1981 | Bengaluru, IN | |
35 | ![]() | $44.77B | public | 2005 | Pleasanton, US | |
36 | ![]() | $43.24B | public | 1988 | Zürich, CH | |
37 | ![]() | $43.22B | public | 1919 | London, GB | |
38 | ![]() | $40.1B | public | 1998 | Redwood City, US | |
39 | ![]() | $39.24B | public | 2015 | Chicago, US | |
40 | ![]() | $38.11B | public | 1968 | Jacksonville, US | |
41 | ![]() | $38.06B | public | 1982 | San Rafael, US | |
42 | ![]() | $36.59B | public | 1690 | London, GB | |
43 | ![]() | $36.55B | public | 1909 | New York, US | |
44 | ![]() | $36.37B | public | 1969 | Houston, US | |
45 | ![]() | $35.56B | public | 1885 | Glendale, US | |
46 | ![]() | $33.73B | public | 1994 | Paris, FR | |
47 | ![]() | $31.69B | public | 1876 | Stockholm, SE | |
48 | ![]() | $31.11B | public | 1939 | Palo Alto, US | |
49 | ![]() | $30.82B | public | 2006 | Eindhoven, NL | |
50 | ![]() | $30.79B | public | 2008 | Toronto, CA | |
51 | ![]() | $29.88B | public | 1932 | Wallingford, US | |
52 | ![]() | $29.0B | public | 1865 | Espoo, FI | |
53 | ![]() | $25.58B | public | 2016 | Uxbridge, GB | |
54 | ![]() | $24.83B | public | 1999 | Santa Clara, US | |
55 | ![]() | $24.6B | public | 2006 | Stockholm, SE | |
56 | ![]() | $23.62B | public | 1928 | Chicago, US | |
57 | ![]() | $23.52B | public | 2005 | Santa Clara, US | |
58 | ![]() | $23.23B | public | 1828 | London, GB | |
59 | ![]() | $22.28B | public | 1979 | Kansas City, US | |
60 | ![]() | $21.83B | public | 1939 | Palo Alto, US | |
61 | ![]() | $20.97B | public | 1903 | Milwaukee, US | |
62 | ![]() | $20.29B | public | 1967 | Winona, US | |
63 | ![]() | $20.18B | public | 2004 | San Francisco, US | |
64 | ![]() | $20.05B | public | 1880 | Broomfield, US | |
65 | ![]() | $19.87B | public | 1930 | Berwyn, US | |
66 | ![]() | $19.67B | public | 1988 | San Jose, US | |
67 | ![]() | $18.94B | public | 1989 | Columbus, US | |
68 | ![]() | $18.74B | public | 1969 | New York, US | |
69 | ![]() | $18.43B | public | 1993 | San Carlos, US | |
70 | ![]() | $17.97B | public | 1986 | Mountain View, US | |
71 | ![]() | $17.81B | public | 1991 | Talleyville, US | |
72 | ![]() | $17.66B | public | 1976 | Montréal, CA | |
73 | ![]() | $17.42B | public | 1906 | Los Angeles, US | |
74 | ![]() | $16.52B | public | 2008 | San Francisco, US | |
75 | ![]() | $16.42B | public | 2014 | Santa Rosa, US | |
76 | ![]() | $16.42B | public | 1987 | Plan-les-Ouates, CH | |
77 | ![]() | $16.16B | public | 1970 | Canonsburg, US | |
78 | ![]() | $15.37B | public | 1971 | New York, US | |
79 | ![]() | $15.28B | public | 2000 | Sunnyvale, US | |
80 | ![]() | $15.15B | public | 1989 | San Diego, US | |
81 | ![]() | $14.93B | public | 1982 | Mountain View, US | |
82 | ![]() | $14.53B | public | 1979 | Stamford, US | |
83 | ![]() | $13.17B | public | 1940 | Sant Cugat del Vallès, ES | |
84 | ![]() | $13.11B | public | 1998 | Cambridge, US | |
85 | ![]() | $12.3B | public | 2009 | San Jose, US | |
86 | ![]() | $11.59B | public | 1960 | Ann Arbor, US | |
87 | ![]() | $11.14B | public | 1969 | Lincolnshire, US | |
88 | ![]() | $10.83B | public | 1991 | Waterloo, CA | |
89 | ![]() | $10.74B | public | 1947 | Dallas, US | |
90 | ![]() | $10.63B | public | 1978 | Sunnyvale, US | |
91 | ![]() | $10.49B | public | 1985 | Needham, US | |
92 | ![]() | $9.65B | public | 1993 | Newtown, US | |
93 | ![]() | $9.32B | public | Cambridge, US | ||
94 | ![]() | $9.22B | public | 1996 | Seattle, US | |
95 | ![]() | $9.19B | public | 1952 | Hercules, US | |
96 | ![]() | $9.07B | public | 1951 | Boston, US | |
97 | ![]() | $8.72B | public | 1923 | New York, US | |
98 | ![]() | $8.67B | public | Atlanta, US | ||
99 | ![]() | $8.41B | public | 1981 | Natick, US | |
100 | ![]() | $8.33B | public | 1954 | Westlake, US |
There’s no denying, the Microsoft ranked number one in the list above. This an American IT company which supports, widely understood, computer software and electronics. But the profile of the largest companies in Sweden by market cap also includes domestic Swedish groups. Have you found them already?
5. Sweden largest companies by number of stores
In this part of the article, you can look at the biggest companies in Sweden by the number of stores. There is a place for Swedish companies, for example, the Kungsleden. If you are looking for premises in Sweden, you might choose from 9 company’s stores, where specialists provide services for managing and owning offices. Of course, other multinational companies in Sweden are also present in this ranking – we are sure that brands such as AXA, Deloitte, or Shell sound familiar to you. Now it’s only the time, to check the best positions from the list:
# | Name | Stores | Type | Founded | Headquarter | Links |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() | 53 | private | 1987 | Amstelveen, NL | |
2 | ![]() | 38 | public | 1976 | Montréal, CA | |
3 | ![]() | 32 | public | 1988 | Zürich, CH | |
4 | ![]() | 15 | private | 1845 | New York, US | |
5 | ![]() | 13 | private | 2010 | Malmö, SE | |
6 | ![]() | 9 | public | 1895 | Hagalund, SE | |
7 | ![]() | 9 | public | 1945 | Solna, SE | |
8 | ![]() | 9 | public | 1994 | Stockholm, SE | |
9 | ![]() | 8 | public | 1912 | Nacka, SE | |
10 | ![]() | 7 | public | 1889 | Kungsholmen, SE | |
11 | ![]() | 6 | public | 1942 | Montréal, CA | |
12 | ![]() | 6 | public | 1999 | Solna, SE | |
13 | ![]() | 5 | public | 1952 | Markaryd, SE | |
14 | ![]() | 5 | public | 1929 | Chicago, US | |
15 | ![]() | 5 | public | 1981 | Waterloo, CA | |
16 | ![]() | 5 | public | 1997 | Gothenburg, SE | |
17 | ![]() | 5 | public | 2005 | Råsunda, SE | |
18 | ![]() | 5 | public | 1984 | Ljungby, SE | |
19 | ![]() | 4 | public | 1967 | Paris, FR | |
20 | ![]() | 4 | public | 1985 | Paris, FR | |
21 | ![]() | 4 | public | 1953 | Stockholm, SE | |
22 | ![]() | 4 | public | 1906 | Freienbach, CH | |
23 | ![]() | 4 | public | 1999 | Helsinki, FI | |
24 | ![]() | 4 | public | 1991 | Waterloo, CA | |
25 | ![]() | 4 | public | 1978 | Sunnyvale, US | |
26 | ![]() | 4 | public | 1935 | Englewood, US | |
27 | ![]() | 4 | subsidiary | 1851 | Norrmalm, SE | |
28 | ![]() | 4 | public | 1907 | Espoo, FI | |
29 | ![]() | 4 | private | 1983 | Gavle, SE | |
30 | ![]() | 4 | private | 2011 | Helsinki, FI | |
31 | ![]() | 4 | private | 1975 | Östermalm, SE | |
32 | ![]() | 4 | private | 2003 | Stockholm, SE | |
33 | ![]() | 4 | public | 1997 | Örnsköldsvik, SE | |
34 | ![]() | 4 | private | 2002 | New York, US | |
35 | ![]() | 3 | public | 1981 | Bengaluru, IN | |
36 | ![]() | 3 | public | 1999 | Noida, IN | |
37 | ![]() | 3 | public | 1876 | Stockholm, SE | |
38 | ![]() | 3 | public | 1947 | Stockholm, SE | |
39 | ![]() | 3 | public | 1907 | Den Haag, NL | |
40 | ![]() | 3 | public | 1906 | Los Angeles, US | |
41 | ![]() | 3 | public | 1919 | London, GB | |
42 | ![]() | 3 | public | 11832 | Norrmalm, SE | |
43 | ![]() | 3 | public | 1922 | Hägersten-Liljeholmen, SE | |
44 | ![]() | 3 | public | 1985 | Needham, US | |
45 | ![]() | 3 | public | 1869 | Ballerup, DK | |
46 | ![]() | 3 | public | 1987 | Stockholm, SE | |
47 | ![]() | 3 | public | 1985 | Troy, US | |
48 | ![]() | 3 | subsidiary | 1999 | Orlando, US | |
49 | ![]() | 3 | subsidiary | 1928 | Dallas, US | |
50 | ![]() | 3 | public | 1848 | München, DE | |
51 | ![]() | 3 | private | 1992 | Östermalm, SE | |
52 | ![]() | 3 | private | 1889 | Östermalm, SE | |
53 | ![]() | 3 | private | 2012 | San Francisco, US | |
54 | ![]() | 3 | public | 1986 | Wokingham, GB | |
55 | ![]() | 2 | public | 1968 | Mumbai, IN | |
56 | ![]() | 2 | public | 1989 | Dublin 4, IE | |
57 | ![]() | 2 | public | 1885 | Glendale, US | |
58 | ![]() | 2 | public | 1997 | Bezons, FR | |
59 | ![]() | 2 | public | 1968 | Santa Clara, US | |
60 | ![]() | 2 | public | 1935 | Minato, JP | |
61 | ![]() | 2 | public | 1986 | Pune, IN | |
62 | ![]() | 2 | public | 1947 | Dallas, US | |
63 | ![]() | 2 | public | 1898 | Akron, US | |
64 | ![]() | 2 | public | 1902 | Paris, FR | |
65 | ![]() | 2 | public | 1939 | Palo Alto, US | |
66 | ![]() | 2 | private | 1943 | Delft, NL | |
67 | ![]() | 2 | subsidiary | 2000 | Frankfurt, DE | |
68 | ![]() | 2 | public | 1873 | Nacka, SE | |
69 | ![]() | 2 | public | 1993 | Newtown, US | |
70 | ![]() | 2 | public | 1968 | Paris, FR | |
71 | ![]() | 2 | private | 1926 | New York, US | |
72 | ![]() | 2 | public | 1903 | Milwaukee, US | |
73 | ![]() | 2 | public | 1852 | Stockholm , SE | |
74 | ![]() | 2 | public | 1996 | Westborough, US | |
75 | ![]() | 2 | public | 1883 | Lund, SE | |
76 | ![]() | 2 | public | 1834 | Winterthur, CH | |
77 | ![]() | 2 | public | 1989 | Columbus, US | |
78 | ![]() | 2 | public | 1979 | Stamford, US | |
79 | ![]() | 2 | public | 1862 | Birmingham, GB | |
80 | ![]() | 2 | public | 1986 | Mountain View, US | |
81 | ![]() | 2 | public | 1934 | Wimborne, GB | |
82 | ![]() | 2 | public | 1988 | San Jose, US | |
83 | ![]() | 2 | public | 1924 | Downers Grove, US | |
84 | ![]() | 2 | public | 2004 | Santa Clara, US | |
85 | ![]() | 2 | public | 1964 | Stockholm, SE | |
86 | ![]() | 2 | public | 1828 | London, GB | |
87 | ![]() | 2 | public | 1914 | Milwaukee, US | |
88 | ![]() | 2 | public | 1906 | Brøndbyvester, DK | |
89 | ![]() | 2 | public | 2009 | San Jose, US | |
90 | ![]() | 2 | public | 2001 | Farnborough, GB | |
91 | ![]() | 2 | public | 2006 | Stockholm, SE | |
92 | ![]() | 2 | public | 1929 | Högsbo, SE | |
93 | ![]() | 2 | public | 1947 | Viby J, DK | |
94 | ![]() | 2 | public | 1950 | Valley City, US | |
95 | ![]() | 2 | subsidiary | 1990 | San Jose, US | |
96 | ![]() | 2 | public | 1945 | Habo N, SE | |
97 | ![]() | 2 | public | 1899 | Bergen, NO | |
98 | ![]() | 2 | private | 1967 | München, DE | |
99 | ![]() | 2 | private | 1958 | Fridolfing, DE | |
100 | ![]() | 2 | public | 1963 | München, DE |
Check out how we get data for our rankings
6.The biggest Sweden companies by number of employees
Companies aim to reach new market segments and expand their activities to new services and products. They build new factories and open further offices. All of these operations need labor force, so with the growth of a business, companies hire new employees. They get different positions – from the CEOs to part-time workers. So, let’s take a closer look at them. Not at an individual employee naturally, but at companies in Sweden with the highest number of employees.
# | Name | Employees | Type | Founded | Headquarter | Links |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() | 630600 | public | 1994 | Seattle, US | |
2 | ![]() | 600000 | public | 1941 | Surrey, GB | |
3 | ![]() | 459000 | public | 1989 | Dublin 4, IE | |
4 | ![]() | 417929 | public | 1968 | Mumbai, IN | |
5 | ![]() | 379000 | public | 1847 | München, DE | |
6 | ![]() | 345000 | public | 1934 | Kungsholmen, SE | |
7 | ![]() | 323000 | public | 1866 | Vevey, CH | |
8 | ![]() | 320000 | public | 1960 | Ann Arbor, US | |
9 | ![]() | 283000 | public | 1892 | Boston, US | |
10 | ![]() | 281600 | public | 1994 | Paris, FR | |
11 | ![]() | 276973 | private | 1989 | London, GB | |
12 | ![]() | 273858 | public | 1918 | Kadoma, JP | |
13 | ![]() | 268000 | public | 1876 | Dallas, US | |
14 | ![]() | 263900 | private | 1845 | New York, US | |
15 | ![]() | 250930 | private | 1998 | London, GB | |
16 | ![]() | 211313 | public | 1967 | Paris, FR | |
17 | ![]() | 205000 | public | 1904 | Charlotte, US | |
18 | ![]() | 204107 | public | 1981 | Bengaluru, IN | |
19 | ![]() | 204000 | public | 1812 | New York, US | |
20 | ![]() | 200000 | public | 1969 | Singapore, SG | |
21 | ![]() | 193279 | private | 1987 | Amstelveen, NL | |
22 | ![]() | 180000 | private | 1987 | Shenzhen, CN | |
23 | ![]() | 177000 | public | 1947 | Stockholm, SE | |
24 | ![]() | 174386 | public | 1985 | Arteixo, ES | |
25 | ![]() | 169000 | public | 1853 | Paris, FR | |
26 | ![]() | 163827 | public | 1945 | Bengaluru, IN | |
27 | ![]() | 161659 | subsidiary | 1998 | Mountain View, US | |
28 | ![]() | 160566 | public | 1929 | London, GB | |
29 | ![]() | 153124 | public | 1836 | Rueil-Malmaison, FR | |
30 | ![]() | 146600 | public | 1988 | Zürich, CH | |
31 | ![]() | 142340 | public | 1921 | Tokyo, JP | |
32 | ![]() | 140365 | public | 1935 | Minato, JP | |
33 | ![]() | 137000 | public | 1977 | Redwood City, US | |
34 | ![]() | 133475 | public | 1916 | München, DE | |
35 | ![]() | 131000 | public | 1975 | Redmond, US | |
36 | ![]() | 122110 | public | 1997 | Bezons, FR | |
37 | ![]() | 122000 | public | 1885 | Glendale, US | |
38 | ![]() | 121597 | public | 1996 | Basel, CH | |
39 | ![]() | 120081 | public | 1999 | Noida, IN | |
40 | ![]() | 118391 | public | 1986 | Pune, IN | |
41 | ![]() | 117300 | public | 1946 | Tokyo, JP | |
42 | ![]() | 115686 | public | 1997 | Nanterre, FR | |
43 | ![]() | 114000 | public | 1906 | Morris Plains, US | |
44 | ![]() | 111588 | public | 1985 | Paris, FR | |
45 | ![]() | 111100 | public | 1889 | Clermont-Ferrand, FR | |
46 | ![]() | 109390 | public | 1899 | Tokyo, JP | |
47 | ![]() | 108800 | public | 1968 | Santa Clara, US | |
48 | ![]() | 105175 | public | 1927 | Göteborg, SE | |
49 | ![]() | 103000 | public | 1865 | Espoo, FI | |
50 | ![]() | 100735 | public | 1876 | Stockholm, SE | |
51 | ![]() | 97878 | public | 1936 | Yokohama-shi, JP | |
52 | ![]() | 97368 | public | 1878 | Genève, CH | |
53 | ![]() | 96498 | public | 1972 | Newtown Square, US | |
54 | ![]() | 90200 | public | 1849 | New York, US | |
55 | ![]() | 90000 | public | 1783 | Chicago, US | |
56 | ![]() | 87000 | public | 1990 | Los Angeles, US | |
57 | ![]() | 85800 | public | 1999 | London, GB | |
58 | ![]() | 85000 | public | 2016 | Plymouth, US | |
59 | ![]() | 83500 | public | 1690 | London, GB | |
60 | ![]() | 82838 | public | 1853 | London, GB | |
61 | ![]() | 82000 | public | 1907 | Den Haag, NL | |
62 | ![]() | 80000 | public | 1906 | Los Angeles, US | |
63 | ![]() | 77739 | public | 1934 | Tokyo, JP | |
64 | ![]() | 77164 | public | 1950 | Chiyoda-ku, JP | |
65 | ![]() | 75876 | public | 1890 | Las Condes, CL | |
66 | ![]() | 74400 | public | 1947 | Dallas, US | |
67 | ![]() | 74200 | public | 1984 | San Jose, US | |
68 | ![]() | 74000 | public | 1976 | Montréal, CA | |
69 | ![]() | 73773 | public | 1958 | Seoul, KR | |
70 | ![]() | 73600 | public | 1932 | Wallingford, US | |
71 | ![]() | 73100 | public | 1972 | Beaverton, US | |
72 | ![]() | 72904 | public | 1835 | Wien, AT | |
73 | ![]() | 72709 | subsidiary | 1979 | Hopkinton, US | |
74 | ![]() | 70263 | public | 1924 | Osaka, JP | |
75 | ![]() | 68388 | subsidiary | 1947 | Duisburg, DE | |
76 | ![]() | 67000 | public | 1969 | Houston, US | |
77 | ![]() | 66000 | public | 1893 | Paris, FR | |
78 | ![]() | 65000 | public | 1902 | Paris, FR | |
79 | ![]() | 64010 | public | 1942 | Montréal, CA | |
80 | ![]() | 64000 | public | 1898 | Akron, US | |
81 | ![]() | 60348 | public | 1935 | New York, US | |
82 | ![]() | 60000 | public | 1939 | Palo Alto, US | |
83 | ![]() | 57700 | public | 1953 | Stockholm, SE | |
84 | ![]() | 55196 | private | 1943 | Delft, NL | |
85 | ![]() | 55000 | public | 1939 | Palo Alto, US | |
86 | ![]() | 54419 | public | 1919 | Stockholm, SE | |
87 | ![]() | 53700 | public | 1876 | Düsseldorf, DE | |
88 | ![]() | 52448 | public | 1911 | Montreal, CA | |
89 | ![]() | 51117 | subsidiary | 1759 | Redditch, GB | |
90 | ![]() | 50000 | private | 1924 | Chicago, US | |
91 | ![]() | 50000 | public | 1884 | London, GB | |
92 | ![]() | 50000 | public | 1919 | London, GB | |
93 | ![]() | 49000 | public | 1923 | Naperville, US | |
94 | ![]() | 47700 | public | 1988 | Stockholm, SE | |
95 | ![]() | 47000 | public | 1968 | Jacksonville, US | |
96 | ![]() | 46664 | public | 1994 | Stockholm, SE | |
97 | ![]() | 46000 | public | 1923 | New York, US | |
98 | ![]() | 46000 | public | 1802 | Wilmington, US | |
99 | ![]() | 45953 | public | 1987 | Plan-les-Ouates, CH | |
100 | ![]() | 44428 | public | 1907 | Göteborg, SE |
Are you surprised that Amazon gets the best position here? Over 630000 people are joined in Amazon team. They have various jobs and the perspective to be promoted in time. Their experience, knowledge, and commitment to work have a direct impact on the career path. What is more, this multinational technological giant is still developing, and hence, the number of employees would be much higher.
7. The best place to work in Sweden
The last, but as important as previous parts of the article, is dedicated to the situation at work in companies in Sweden. We want to perform the best places to work there. Take this list truly for real, because it is based on workers’ votes. They could rate the culture and values, which should be representative of the company. Moreover, employees took into consideration such aspects as a balance between work and life. We can talk about other things like fringe benefits or incentive bonuses which affect their general opinion about the employers. But to cut a long story short, we give you a list of companies in Sweden to look at what businesses were the best rated to work in.
# | Name | Votes | Ratings | Culture & values | Work/life balance | Type | Headquarter | Links |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() | 10161 | 4.5 | 4.5 | 4.4 | public | Newtown Square, US | |
2 | ![]() | 4965 | 4.4 | 4.6 | 4.2 | public | San Francisco, US | |
3 | ![]() | 3470 | 4.4 | 4.3 | 3.8 | public | Menlo Park, US | |
4 | ![]() | 8609 | 4.4 | 4.4 | 4.1 | subsidiary | Mountain View, US | |
5 | ![]() | 8044 | 4.1 | 4.2 | 4.2 | public | Espoo, FI | |
6 | ![]() | 862 | 4.1 | 4.1 | 4.2 | public | Neubiberg, DE | |
7 | ![]() | 21925 | 4.1 | 4.0 | 3.9 | public | Redmond, US | |
8 | ![]() | 7062 | 4.0 | 3.8 | 4.0 | public | München, DE | |
9 | ![]() | 564 | 4.0 | 4.2 | 4.3 | public | Göteborg, SE | |
10 | ![]() | 16536 | 4.0 | 4.1 | 4.1 | public | San Jose, US | |
11 | ![]() | 4294 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 3.7 | public | London, GB | |
12 | ![]() | 3307 | 3.9 | 3.8 | 3.8 | public | New York, US | |
13 | ![]() | 470 | 3.9 | 4.1 | 4.2 | public | Bærum, NO | |
14 | ![]() | 12644 | 3.9 | 3.8 | 3.8 | public | Santa Clara, US | |
15 | ![]() | 2048 | 3.9 | 4.2 | 4.0 | public | Palo Alto, US | |
16 | ![]() | 4405 | 3.9 | 3.9 | 3.8 | public | Rueil-Malmaison, FR | |
17 | ![]() | 42120 | 3.9 | 3.9 | 3.4 | public | Dublin 4, IE | |
18 | ![]() | 5949 | 3.9 | 3.8 | 2.9 | public | New York, US | |
19 | ![]() | 4365 | 3.9 | 3.8 | 3.8 | public | Den Haag, NL | |
20 | ![]() | 1623 | 3.8 | 3.7 | 3.8 | public | Newtown, US | |
21 | ![]() | 2148 | 3.8 | 4.0 | 3.5 | public | Portage, US | |
22 | ![]() | 65 | 3.8 | 3.1 | 3.0 | public | Wien, AT | |
23 | ![]() | 513 | 3.8 | 3.8 | 3.7 | public | Clermont-Ferrand, FR | |
24 | ![]() | 1444 | 3.8 | 3.7 | 3.9 | public | London, GB | |
25 | ![]() | 1422 | 3.8 | 3.7 | 3.5 | public | Düsseldorf, DE | |
26 | ![]() | 27837 | 3.8 | 3.8 | 3.0 | private | New York, US | |
27 | ![]() | 426 | 3.8 | 3.9 | 3.5 | public | Nacka, SE | |
28 | ![]() | 36524 | 3.7 | 3.8 | 3.7 | public | Mumbai, IN | |
29 | ![]() | 1299 | 3.7 | 3.7 | 4.0 | public | Plan-les-Ouates, CH | |
30 | ![]() | 3224 | 3.7 | 3.6 | 3.5 | public | Los Angeles, US | |
31 | ![]() | 7198 | 3.7 | 3.9 | 3.5 | public | New York, US | |
32 | ![]() | 2121 | 3.7 | 3.7 | 3.2 | private | Chicago, US | |
33 | ![]() | 5409 | 3.7 | 3.5 | 3.4 | public | San Diego, US | |
34 | ![]() | 2947 | 3.7 | 3.7 | 3.3 | public | Vevey, CH | |
35 | ![]() | 10814 | 3.7 | 3.2 | 3.2 | public | Pune, IN | |
36 | ![]() | 2872 | 3.7 | 3.5 | 3.5 | public | Basel, CH | |
37 | ![]() | 6885 | 3.6 | 3.2 | 3.2 | public | Morris Plains, US | |
38 | ![]() | 2840 | 3.6 | 3.6 | 3.6 | public | Zürich, CH | |
39 | ![]() | 592 | 3.6 | 3.4 | 3.3 | public | Danbury, US | |
40 | ![]() | 21154 | 3.6 | 3.5 | 3.5 | public | Charlotte, US | |
41 | ![]() | 1785 | 3.6 | 3.4 | 3.6 | public | Paris, FR | |
42 | ![]() | 138 | 3.6 | 3.3 | 3.5 | public | Chiyoda-ku, JP | |
43 | ![]() | 228 | 3.6 | 3.5 | 3.7 | public | Göteborg, SE | |
44 | ![]() | 28271 | 3.6 | 3.5 | 3.4 | public | Paris, FR | |
45 | ![]() | 98 | 3.6 | 3.5 | 4.1 | public | London, GB | |
46 | ![]() | 944 | 3.6 | 3.6 | 3.5 | public | Singapore, SG | |
47 | ![]() | 2739 | 3.6 | 3.6 | 3.5 | public | Chicago, US | |
48 | ![]() | 795 | 3.6 | 3.5 | 3.8 | public | Eindhoven, NL | |
49 | ![]() | 4430 | 3.5 | 3.7 | 3.4 | public | New York, US | |
50 | ![]() | 791 | 3.5 | 3.1 | 3.4 | public | Montreal, CA | |
51 | ![]() | 182 | 3.5 | 3.0 | 3.0 | public | Kyoto, JP | |
52 | ![]() | 8967 | 3.5 | 3.5 | 3.7 | public | Palo Alto, US | |
53 | ![]() | 14418 | 3.5 | 3.5 | 3.3 | public | New York, US | |
54 | ![]() | 2679 | 3.5 | 3.5 | 3.5 | public | Dallas, US | |
55 | ![]() | 371 | 3.5 | 3.5 | 3.6 | public | Stockholm, SE | |
56 | ![]() | 8855 | 3.5 | 3.8 | 3.9 | public | Stockholm, SE | |
57 | ![]() | 1007 | 3.4 | 3.5 | 3.5 | public | Kadoma, JP | |
58 | ![]() | 395 | 3.4 | 3.2 | 3.2 | public | Stockholm, SE | |
59 | ![]() | 21890 | 3.4 | 3.2 | 3.8 | public | Redwood City, US | |
60 | ![]() | 6191 | 3.4 | 3.4 | 3.6 | public | Montréal, CA | |
61 | ![]() | 3760 | 3.4 | 3.2 | 3.0 | public | Ann Arbor, US | |
62 | ![]() | 32959 | 3.3 | 3.8 | 3.5 | public | Bengaluru, IN | |
63 | ![]() | 14470 | 3.3 | 3.3 | 3.3 | public | Paris, FR | |
64 | ![]() | 1365 | 3.3 | 3.1 | 2.7 | public | Slough, GB | |
65 | ![]() | 1951 | 3.3 | 3.0 | 3.2 | public | Zürich, CH | |
66 | ![]() | 1375 | 3.3 | 3.1 | 3.2 | public | Surrey, GB | |
67 | ![]() | 2698 | 3.3 | 3.2 | 3.4 | public | Jacksonville, US | |
68 | ![]() | 152 | 3.3 | 3.5 | 3.4 | public | Mannheim, DE | |
69 | ![]() | 3384 | 3.3 | 3.8 | 3.4 | private | Delft, NL | |
70 | ![]() | 1537 | 3.3 | 3.5 | 3.1 | public | Naperville, US | |
71 | ![]() | 2109 | 3.3 | 3.3 | 3.6 | public | Paris, FR | |
72 | ![]() | 901 | 3.3 | 3.5 | 3.4 | public | Paris, FR | |
73 | ![]() | 890 | 3.3 | 3.2 | 3.2 | public | Paris, FR | |
74 | ![]() | 1000 | 3.3 | 3.1 | 3.0 | public | Akron, US | |
75 | ![]() | 12984 | 3.3 | 3.2 | 3.5 | public | Noida, IN | |
76 | ![]() | 19236 | 3.2 | 3.6 | 3.3 | public | Bengaluru, IN | |
77 | ![]() | 1272 | 3.2 | 2.9 | 2.8 | public | Seoul, KR | |
78 | ![]() | 1625 | 3.2 | 3.3 | 3.6 | public | Paris, FR | |
79 | ![]() | 168 | 3.2 | 3.2 | 3.0 | public | Osaka, JP | |
80 | ![]() | 4499 | 3.2 | 3.0 | 3.4 | public | Bezons, FR | |
81 | ![]() | 214 | 3.2 | 3.0 | 3.1 | public | Wallingford, US | |
82 | ![]() | 380 | 3.2 | 3.0 | 3.4 | public | Tokyo, JP | |
83 | ![]() | 84 | 3.2 | 3.2 | 3.3 | public | Zwevegem, BE | |
84 | ![]() | 3221 | 3.1 | 2.9 | 2.6 | public | Chicago, US | |
85 | ![]() | 742 | 3.1 | 2.7 | 2.9 | subsidiary | Duisburg, DE | |
86 | ![]() | 7783 | 3.1 | 3.0 | 3.3 | subsidiary | Framingham, US | |
87 | ![]() | 1744 | 3.1 | 2.9 | 3.3 | public | Montréal, CA | |
88 | ![]() | 204 | 3.1 | 3.0 | 3.1 | public | Plymouth, US | |
89 | ![]() | 4443 | 3.1 | 3.0 | 3.3 | public | Los Angeles, US | |
90 | ![]() | 2583 | 3.1 | 3.2 | 3.4 | public | Minato, JP | |
91 | ![]() | 2939 | 3.1 | 3.0 | 3.0 | public | Glendale, US | |
92 | ![]() | 319 | 3.1 | 2.9 | 2.6 | public | Arteixo, ES | |
93 | ![]() | 213 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 3.3 | public | Tokyo, JP | |
94 | ![]() | 144 | 3.0 | 2.8 | 2.7 | public | Madrid, ES | |
95 | ![]() | 519 | 3.0 | 2.7 | 2.8 | subsidiary | Redditch, GB | |
96 | ![]() | 888 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 3.2 | public | Genève, CH | |
97 | ![]() | 917 | 2.9 | 2.9 | 3.3 | public | Yokohama-shi, JP | |
98 | ![]() | 237 | 2.9 | 2.9 | 2.9 | public | Stockholm, SE | |
99 | ![]() | 1350 | 2.8 | 2.6 | 2.6 | public | Kungsholmen, SE | |
100 | ![]() | 45 | 2.42 | 2.2 | 2.2 | public | Osaka, JP |
So, which companies can be determined as the places with the most satisfied employees? The first five position goes to popular groups, you undoubtedly know. We can see Nokia, Google, Facebook and, Salesforce here. But the winner can be only one, and the SAP company takes this position. It is an entity from Germany, which was a pioneer of business software ERP and nowadays provides its services in over 130 countries.
Learn more about our ranking using policy
8. Summary
Sweden has not only a competitive and successful economy but is also known for its good foreign relations. It might impact the global investors’ actions, and without no doubt, it is attractive for companies. Looking at the possibilities and development, the number of business would be certainly higher. If you want to have up-to-date information about a particular group of businesses, we give you a great option to let you do it. You just need to visit Datantify – the website with a database of global companies from different kind of industries. We are sure it would be useful for you!

with active e-mails, phone numbers
and more
[…] you could conduct a transaction. No doubt you have heard about more global marketplaces such as Rakuten, eBay, Alibaba, and AliExpress. Using of its services can lead to conquering international markets […]
[…] countries give us an array of possibilities to do. We are able not only to travel abroad but also start an international business. It is a good idea for people who want to expand into global markets, reach a new segment of […]
[…] Read also our previous article:Top 40 companies of ASX by market cap https://datantify.com/knowledge/top-40-companies-of-asx-by-market-cap/ […]
[…] Read also our previous article: TOP 50 Largest Financial Companies in the World in 2020https://datantify.com/knowledge/top-50-largest-financial-companies-in-the-world-in-2020/ […]