Top Companies in the USA by Revenue, Market cap and More [2019 Edition]
The United States is for sure the top of one of the fastest-growing markets in the world. The American market is very diverse. It offers machine manufacturing, internet services and much more. The largest companies in us are becoming more and more successful every year. They are famous for their original advertisements and more. So today, let’s take a closer look at some top US companies.
1. Introduction
In our directory of companies, we decided to depict the largest United States companies in terms of various factors such as the size of revenues, number of employees, market capital and more. All information is presented in a hierarchy of sizes from the largest to the smallest, providing a clear, simple and understandable message. In addition, we have made sure that each category is briefly described with useful information giving you as much interesting and valuable information as possible. Then let’s start…
2. Quick summary
In America, more and more companies are emerging, which with their dynamic growth are breaking into positions in the rankings of companies. Remember that the data provided are current as of today and may change significantly over the next few weeks, so if you are interested in a list of American companies in a given region, you need to check our database, which contains complete and up-to-date data of companies.
3. Top companies by revenue
Let see which company in the United States has the biggest revenue
# | Name | Revenue | Type | Founded | Headquarter | Links |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() | $514.4B | public | 1962 | Bentonville, US | |
2 | ![]() | $311.87B | public | 1907 | Den Haag, NL | |
3 | ![]() | $267.55B | public | 1937 | Toyota City, JP | |
4 | ![]() | $265.6B | public | 1976 | Cupertino, US | |
5 | ![]() | $258.27B | public | 1937 | Wolfsburg, DE | |
6 | ![]() | $232.89B | public | 1994 | Seattle, US | |
7 | ![]() | $226.25B | public | 1980 | Minneapolis, US | |
8 | ![]() | $208.36B | public | 1833 | San Francisco, US | |
9 | ![]() | $206.03B | public | 1969 | Suwon, KR | |
10 | ![]() | $193.92B | public | 1963 | Woonsocket, US | |
11 | ![]() | $174.05B | public | 1938 | Seoul, KR | |
12 | ![]() | $170.76B | public | 1876 | Dallas, US | |
13 | ![]() | $167.94B | public | 2001 | Wayne, US | |
14 | ![]() | $166.34B | public | 1879 | San Ramon, US | |
15 | ![]() | $149.1B | public | 1924 | Courbevoie, FR | |
16 | ![]() | $141.58B | public | 1976 | Issaquah, US | |
17 | ![]() | $139.89B | public | 1959 | Tokyo, JP | |
18 | ![]() | $136.82B | public | 2015 | Mountain View, US | |
19 | ![]() | $131.54B | public | 2014 | Deerfield, US | |
20 | ![]() | $124.2B | public | 1899 | London, GB | |
21 | ![]() | $122.66B | public | 1883 | Cincinnati, US | |
22 | ![]() | $121.61B | public | 1892 | Boston, US | |
23 | ![]() | $117.03B | public | 1980 | San Antonio, US | |
24 | ![]() | $114.22B | public | 1875 | Houston, US | |
25 | ![]() | $112.46B | public | 1848 | London, GB | |
26 | ![]() | $110.58B | public | 1904 | Charlotte, US | |
27 | ![]() | $110.48B | public | 1916 | München, DE | |
28 | ![]() | $110.36B | public | 1975 | Redmond, US | |
29 | ![]() | $101.13B | public | 1916 | Chicago, US | |
30 | ![]() | $100.9B | public | 1978 | Atlanta, US | |
31 | ![]() | $97.1B | public | 2009 | Findlay, US | |
32 | ![]() | $90.62B | public | 2016 | Round Rock, US | |
33 | ![]() | $88.26B | public | 1866 | Vevey, CH | |
34 | ![]() | $86.34B | public | 1910 | Tokyo, JP | |
35 | ![]() | $83.91B | public | 1995 | Bonn, DE | |
36 | ![]() | $81.87B | private | 1886 | Gerlingen, DE | |
37 | ![]() | $81.58B | public | 1886 | New Brunswick, US | |
38 | ![]() | $79.59B | public | 1911 | Armonk, US | |
39 | ![]() | $77.81B | public | 1946 | Tokyo, JP | |
40 | ![]() | $75.36B | public | 1962 | Minneapolis, US | |
41 | ![]() | $74.99B | subsidiary | 1998 | Mountain View, US | |
42 | ![]() | $71.33B | public | 1970 | Leiden, NL | |
43 | ![]() | $70.85B | public | 1968 | Santa Clara, US | |
44 | ![]() | $68.96B | public | 1880 | München, DE | |
45 | ![]() | $68.91B | public | 1950 | Chiyoda-ku, JP | |
46 | ![]() | $68.62B | public | 1946 | Mooresville, US | |
47 | ![]() | $66.83B | public | 1837 | Cincinnati, US | |
48 | ![]() | $66.5B | public | 1934 | Farmington, US | |
49 | ![]() | $64.19B | subsidiary | 1969 | Bonn, DE | |
50 | ![]() | $60.53B | public | 1853 | Hartford, US | |
51 | ![]() | $60.28B | public | 1897 | Midland, US | |
52 | ![]() | $60.12B | public | 1984 | St. Louis, US | |
53 | ![]() | $59.43B | public | 1923 | Burbank, US | |
54 | ![]() | $59.11B | public | 1948 | Nagoya, JP | |
55 | ![]() | $58.73B | public | 1969 | Houston, US | |
56 | ![]() | $58.47B | public | 1939 | Palo Alto, US | |
57 | ![]() | $56.94B | subsidiary | 1984 | Round Rock, US | |
58 | ![]() | $56.91B | public | 1961 | Louisville, US | |
59 | ![]() | $55.84B | public | 2004 | Menlo Park, US | |
60 | ![]() | $54.72B | public | 1925 | Peoria, US | |
61 | ![]() | $53.76B | public | 1912 | Bethesda, US | |
62 | ![]() | $53.65B | public | 1849 | New York, US | |
63 | ![]() | $51.89B | public | 1958 | Seoul, KR | |
64 | ![]() | $51.39B | public | 1980 | Laval, CA | |
65 | ![]() | $49.33B | public | 1984 | San Jose, US | |
66 | ![]() | $49.27B | public | 1871 | Hannover, DE | |
67 | ![]() | $49.11B | public | 1996 | Basel, CH | |
68 | ![]() | $47.32B | public | 1896 | Basel, CH | |
69 | ![]() | $46.4B | public | 1999 | Essen, DE | |
70 | ![]() | $45.35B | public | 1984 | Hong Kong, HK | |
71 | ![]() | $43.96B | public | 1919 | Tokyo, JP | |
72 | ![]() | $43.28B | public | 1850 | New York, US | |
73 | ![]() | $43.24B | public | 1887 | Toronto, CA | |
74 | ![]() | $43.03B | subsidiary | 1979 | Irvine, US | |
75 | ![]() | $42.88B | public | 1966 | Richfield, US | |
76 | ![]() | $42.29B | public | 1891 | Kenilworth, US | |
77 | ![]() | $41.8B | public | 1906 | Morris Plains, US | |
78 | ![]() | $41.6B | public | 1989 | Dublin 4, IE | |
79 | ![]() | $41.49B | public | 2004 | Paris, FR | |
80 | ![]() | $41.3B | public | 1926 | Chicago, US | |
81 | ![]() | $40.9B | public | 1921 | Tokyo, JP | |
82 | ![]() | $40.05B | public | 1935 | Springdale, US | |
83 | ![]() | $39.83B | public | 1977 | Redwood City, US | |
84 | ![]() | $39.81B | public | 1931 | Northbrook, US | |
85 | ![]() | $39.2B | public | 1863 | Leverkusen, DE | |
86 | ![]() | $37.16B | public | 1937 | Tokyo, JP | |
87 | ![]() | $36.68B | public | 1999 | Hangzhou, CN | |
88 | ![]() | $36.41B | public | 1997 | Windsor, GB | |
89 | ![]() | $36.4B | public | 1972 | Beaverton, US | |
90 | ![]() | $36.4B | private | 1930 | Lakeland, US | |
91 | ![]() | $36.33B | subsidiary | 1915 | Pleasanton, US | |
92 | ![]() | $36.19B | public | 1952 | Falls Church, US | |
93 | ![]() | $36.11B | public | 1862 | Zurich, CH | |
94 | ![]() | $35.99B | public | 1935 | Minato, JP | |
95 | ![]() | $35.95B | public | 1875 | Minato-ku, JP | |
96 | ![]() | $34.85B | public | 1998 | Shenzhen, CN | |
97 | ![]() | $32.77B | public | 1902 | Maplewood, US | |
98 | ![]() | $32.38B | public | 1994 | McLean, US | |
99 | ![]() | $31.86B | public | 1886 | Atlanta, US | |
100 | ![]() | $31.4B | public | 1885 | Glendale, US |
See also: Top Companies in Canada by Revenue, Market Cap and More
At this moment we can see that the overall leader among the listed USA companies is the Walmart, which outperforms its twice revenue of Toyota which is in second place of the list. A noteworthy another one of the famous companies in the USA is for sure Alphabet, which has only been on the market for 4 years, and thanks to its rapid development and investment it was ranked 18th in our list.
4. Top companies by market cap
Let’s start with a list of companies in America by market cap, which is particularly busy because the value of companies is constantly changing. You can see all the results below
# | Name | Market cap. | Type | Founded | Headquarter | Links |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() | $967.12B | public | 1975 | Redmond, US | |
2 | ![]() | $960.32B | public | 1994 | Seattle, US | |
3 | ![]() | $959.23B | public | 1976 | Cupertino, US | |
4 | ![]() | $825.84B | public | 2015 | Mountain View, US | |
5 | ![]() | $553.43B | public | 2004 | Menlo Park, US | |
6 | ![]() | $493.53B | public | 1999 | Hangzhou, CN | |
7 | ![]() | $378.14B | public | 1886 | New Brunswick, US | |
8 | ![]() | $374.39B | public | 2000 | New York, US | |
9 | ![]() | $354.12B | public | 1958 | Foster City, US | |
10 | ![]() | $327.94B | public | 1870 | Irving, US | |
11 | ![]() | $290.01B | public | 1962 | Bentonville, US | |
12 | ![]() | $289.71B | public | 1904 | Charlotte, US | |
13 | ![]() | $264.78B | public | 1837 | Cincinnati, US | |
14 | ![]() | $253.26B | public | 1966 | Harrison, US | |
15 | ![]() | $241.85B | public | 1984 | San Jose, US | |
16 | ![]() | $241.47B | public | 1923 | Burbank, US | |
17 | ![]() | $235.69B | public | 1983 | New York, US | |
18 | ![]() | $229.79B | public | 1849 | New York, US | |
19 | ![]() | $229.31B | public | 1968 | Santa Clara, US | |
20 | ![]() | $224.02B | public | 1876 | Dallas, US | |
21 | ![]() | $222.5B | public | 1839 | Omaha, US | |
22 | ![]() | $221.69B | public | 1879 | San Ramon, US | |
23 | ![]() | $220.87B | public | 1980 | Minneapolis, US | |
24 | ![]() | $220.14B | public | 1978 | Atlanta, US | |
25 | ![]() | $218.51B | public | 1852 | San Francisco, US | |
26 | ![]() | $211.81B | public | 1916 | Chicago, US | |
27 | ![]() | $206.78B | public | 1886 | Atlanta, US | |
28 | ![]() | $205.3B | public | 1891 | Kenilworth, US | |
29 | ![]() | $203.46B | public | 1999 | London, GB | |
30 | ![]() | $193.58B | public | 1963 | Philadelphia, US | |
31 | ![]() | $187.25B | public | 1977 | Redwood City, US | |
32 | ![]() | $178.41B | public | 1965 | Harrison, US | |
33 | ![]() | $176.5B | public | 1937 | Toyota City, JP | |
34 | ![]() | $175.93B | public | 1865 | London, GB | |
35 | ![]() | $172.37B | public | 2008 | Leuven, BE | |
36 | ![]() | $165.56B | public | 1997 | Los Gatos, US | |
37 | ![]() | $162.82B | public | 1812 | New York, US | |
38 | ![]() | $152.07B | public | 1972 | Newtown Square, US | |
39 | ![]() | $151.86B | public | 1955 | Oak Brook, US | |
40 | ![]() | $146.13B | public | 1909 | London, GB | |
41 | ![]() | $144.09B | public | 1924 | Courbevoie, FR | |
42 | ![]() | $138.82B | public | 1991 | Illinois City, US | |
43 | ![]() | $138.82B | public | 1993 | Austin, US | |
44 | ![]() | $136.45B | public | 1982 | San Jose, US | |
45 | ![]() | $134.02B | public | 1972 | Beaverton, US | |
46 | ![]() | $132.12B | public | 2008 | New York, US | |
47 | ![]() | $128.89B | public | 1998 | San Jose, US | |
48 | ![]() | $126.84B | public | 1862 | Omaha, US | |
49 | ![]() | $125.9B | public | 1999 | San Francisco, US | |
50 | ![]() | $125.62B | public | 1906 | Morris Plains, US | |
51 | ![]() | $124.97B | public | 2005 | San Jose, US | |
52 | ![]() | $124.47B | public | 1911 | Armonk, US | |
53 | ![]() | $120.89B | public | 1934 | Farmington, US | |
54 | ![]() | $119.55B | public | 1949 | Minneapolis, US | |
55 | ![]() | $116.35B | public | 2013 | Lake Bluff, US | |
56 | ![]() | $113.45B | public | 1876 | Indianapolis, US | |
57 | ![]() | $113.31B | public | 1923 | Bagsvaerd, DK | |
58 | ![]() | $112.42B | public | 1989 | Dublin 4, IE | |
59 | ![]() | $111.36B | public | 1993 | Santa Clara, US | |
60 | ![]() | $111.11B | public | 2006 | Waltham, US | |
61 | ![]() | $108.72B | public | 1980 | Thousand Oaks, US | |
62 | ![]() | $108.7B | public | 1930 | Dallas, US | |
63 | ![]() | $108.07B | public | 1985 | San Diego, US | |
64 | ![]() | $107.6B | public | 1976 | Issaquah, US | |
65 | ![]() | $105.51B | public | 1902 | Maplewood, US | |
66 | ![]() | $103.3B | public | 1955 | Toronto, CA | |
67 | ![]() | $100.77B | public | 1999 | Cambridge, GB | |
68 | ![]() | $100.37B | public | 1997 | London, GB | |
69 | ![]() | $100.15B | public | 1985 | Richmond, US | |
70 | ![]() | $97.91B | public | 1850 | New York, US | |
71 | ![]() | $97.47B | public | 1873 | London, GB | |
72 | ![]() | $95.78B | public | 1984 | Washington, US | |
73 | ![]() | $94.55B | public | 1971 | Seattle, US | |
74 | ![]() | $93.96B | public | 1912 | Bethesda, US | |
75 | ![]() | $91.82B | public | 1985 | Osceola County, US | |
76 | ![]() | $91.57B | public | 1892 | Boston, US | |
77 | ![]() | $91.57B | public | 1892 | Boston, US | |
78 | ![]() | $88.83B | public | 1984 | Veldhoven, NL | |
79 | ![]() | $88.63B | public | 1946 | Mooresville, US | |
80 | ![]() | $85.58B | public | 1987 | Foster City, US | |
81 | ![]() | $85.36B | public | 1968 | Minneapolis, US | |
82 | ![]() | $85.28B | public | 1995 | Boston, US | |
83 | ![]() | $84.06B | public | 1993 | Stamford, US | |
84 | ![]() | $83.43B | public | 1998 | Palo Alto, US | |
85 | ![]() | $81.05B | public | 1935 | New York, US | |
86 | ![]() | $80.07B | public | 1998 | Norwalk, US | |
87 | ![]() | $79.56B | public | 1857 | Madrid, ES | |
88 | ![]() | $78.21B | public | 1925 | Peoria, US | |
89 | ![]() | $76.68B | public | 1887 | New York, US | |
90 | ![]() | $76.11B | public | 1869 | New York, US | |
91 | ![]() | $75.01B | public | 1988 | New York, US | |
92 | ![]() | $74.39B | public | 1907 | Atlanta, US | |
93 | ![]() | $74.33B | public | 2012 | East Hanover, US | |
94 | ![]() | $74.17B | public | 1949 | Houston, US | |
95 | ![]() | $73.53B | public | 1963 | Woonsocket, US | |
96 | ![]() | $72.89B | public | 1802 | Wilmington, US | |
97 | ![]() | $71.29B | public | 1941 | Portage, US | |
98 | ![]() | $69.76B | public | 1949 | Roseland, US | |
99 | ![]() | $69.64B | public | 1853 | Hartford, US | |
100 | ![]() | $69.36B | public | 2012 | Houston, US |
According to the list taking into account the level of Market cap. the richest company in the USA is Microsoft which slowly reaches the phenomenal result of one trillion dollars. Not much missing also Amazon which its value goes head to head with Microsoft.
Apple company last year (On August 2, 2018) was the first to reach the value of one trillion dollars keeping it at the top of the ranking market cap. Unfortunately, the company has fallen to third place in the last few months.
An additional interesting position is a company we mentioned above – Alphabet, which occupies as much as fourth place market cap with the number of $825. 84B!
5. Top companies by number of stores
In this list of company in the United States, we will look at some other parameters. To be precise, we will focus on the number of outlets from the largest number, gradually to the smallest. Surely the biggest advantage in this list will have restaurant chains, which of course sell their products directly, but also a large number of shops can be found selling electronics.
# | Name | Stores | Type | Founded | Headquarter | Links |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() | 651 | public | 1993 | Denver, US | |
2 | ![]() | 401 | public | 1983 | New York, US | |
3 | ![]() | 387 | public | 1999 | Denver, US | |
4 | ![]() | 356 | subsidiary | Bernards, US | ||
5 | ![]() | 355 | public | 1906 | Battle Creek, US | |
6 | ![]() | 328 | subsidiary | 1899 | Overland Park, US | |
7 | ![]() | 325 | private | 1991 | Morristown, US | |
8 | ![]() | 316 | public | 1968 | Minneapolis, US | |
9 | ![]() | 292 | public | 1983 | Fort Myers, US | |
10 | ![]() | 272 | public | 1972 | Glendale, US | |
11 | ![]() | 265 | public | 1932 | Roanoke, US | |
12 | ![]() | 252 | public | 1963 | Philadelphia, US | |
13 | ![]() | 209 | public | 1969 | Houston, US | |
14 | ![]() | 207 | private | 2009 | Orlando, US | |
15 | ![]() | 206 | public | 1966 | Pasadena, US | |
16 | ![]() | 205 | public | 1969 | Columbus, US | |
17 | ![]() | 192 | public | 1960 | Diemen, NL | |
18 | ![]() | 191 | public | 1950 | Hamilton, BM | |
19 | ![]() | 189 | public | 1989 | Lake Forest, US | |
20 | ![]() | 185 | public | 1994 | Cleveland, US | |
21 | ![]() | 180 | public | 1976 | Canton, US | |
22 | ![]() | 170 | public | 1891 | Kenilworth, US | |
23 | ![]() | 169 | subsidiary | 1961 | Milan, IT | |
24 | ![]() | 168 | public | 1889 | Santa Ana, US | |
25 | ![]() | 165 | public | 1906 | Tysons, US | |
26 | ![]() | 164 | subsidiary | 1979 | Hopkinton, US | |
27 | ![]() | 154 | public | 1972 | Burlington, US | |
28 | ![]() | 154 | public | 1937 | Mayfield, US | |
29 | ![]() | 153 | public | 1890 | St. Louis, US | |
30 | ![]() | 151 | public | 1962 | Minneapolis, US | |
31 | ![]() | 150 | public | 1988 | San Ramon, US | |
32 | ![]() | 149 | public | 2012 | Hoffman Estates, US | |
33 | ![]() | 148 | public | 1980 | Norwell, US | |
34 | ![]() | 146 | public | 1986 | Waterbury, US | |
35 | ![]() | 141 | public | 1971 | Rochester, US | |
36 | ![]() | 136 | public | 1891 | Amsterdam, NL | |
37 | ![]() | 135 | public | 1892 | Boston, US | |
38 | ![]() | 133 | subsidiary | 1984 | Fort Worth, US | |
39 | ![]() | 132 | public | 1887 | New York, US | |
40 | ![]() | 130 | public | 1923 | Bagsvaerd, DK | |
41 | ![]() | 129 | public | 1976 | Burlington, US | |
42 | ![]() | 129 | public | 1971 | Birmingham, US | |
43 | ![]() | 129 | subsidiary | 1987 | Omaha, US | |
44 | ![]() | 128 | public | 1929 | Dearborn Heights, US | |
45 | ![]() | 127 | public | 1919 | Columbus, US | |
46 | ![]() | 126 | private | 2010 | Granville, US | |
47 | ![]() | 125 | public | 1999 | Cambridge, GB | |
48 | ![]() | 124 | public | 1993 | Richmond, US | |
49 | ![]() | 124 | public | 1982 | Minneapolis, US | |
50 | ![]() | 122 | subsidiary | 1960 | Cork, IE | |
51 | ![]() | 120 | public | 1947 | Dallas, US | |
52 | ![]() | 120 | public | 1998 | Phoenix, US | |
53 | ![]() | 120 | public | 1962 | Saint Petersburg, US | |
54 | ![]() | 120 | public | 1997 | Richmond, US | |
55 | ![]() | 119 | subsidiary | 1998 | Broomfield, US | |
56 | ![]() | 118 | public | 1932 | Mentor, US | |
57 | ![]() | 116 | public | 1963 | Columbus, US | |
58 | ![]() | 116 | public | 1939 | New York, US | |
59 | ![]() | 113 | public | 1994 | McLean, US | |
60 | ![]() | 111 | public | 1988 | Zürich, CH | |
61 | ![]() | 111 | private | 2012 | Nashville, US | |
62 | ![]() | 110 | public | 1971 | Memphis, US | |
63 | ![]() | 109 | public | 1859 | North Canton, US | |
64 | ![]() | 109 | public | 1953 | Spartanburg, US | |
65 | ![]() | 108 | public | 1919 | London, GB | |
66 | ![]() | 108 | public | 1922 | Watsonville, US | |
67 | ![]() | 106 | public | 1949 | Roseland, US | |
68 | ![]() | 103 | public | 1893 | Houston, US | |
69 | ![]() | 102 | private | 1987 | Amstelveen, NL | |
70 | ![]() | 102 | subsidiary | Reynoldsburg, US | ||
71 | ![]() | 98 | private | 1845 | New York, US | |
72 | ![]() | 98 | public | 1898 | Raleigh, US | |
73 | ![]() | 96 | subsidiary | 1895 | Boston, US | |
74 | ![]() | 95 | subsidiary | 1983 | Chevy Chase, US | |
75 | ![]() | 94 | public | 1828 | Providence, US | |
76 | ![]() | 94 | public | 1959 | Lake Forest, US | |
77 | ![]() | 93 | subsidiary | 1946 | Parker, US | |
78 | ![]() | 92 | public | 1859 | Richmond, US | |
79 | ![]() | 92 | public | 1894 | London, GB | |
80 | ![]() | 92 | public | 1945 | Victor, US | |
81 | ![]() | 92 | subsidiary | Tysons, US | ||
82 | ![]() | 90 | public | 1865 | London, GB | |
83 | ![]() | 90 | public | 1875 | Clayton, US | |
84 | ![]() | 90 | public | 1982 | Harrisburg, US | |
85 | ![]() | 89 | public | 1968 | Santa Clara, US | |
86 | ![]() | 88 | public | 1977 | Redwood City, US | |
87 | ![]() | 87 | public | 1888 | Montebello, US | |
88 | ![]() | 86 | public | 1875 | Newark, US | |
89 | ![]() | 86 | public | 1990 | Chicago, US | |
90 | ![]() | 86 | private | 1982 | Beloit, US | |
91 | ![]() | 85 | public | 1968 | Nashville, US | |
92 | ![]() | 85 | subsidiary | 1851 | London, GB | |
93 | ![]() | 85 | subsidiary | Bolingbrook, US | ||
94 | ![]() | 85 | public | 1978 | Arlington, US | |
95 | ![]() | 84 | subsidiary | 1982 | Greensboro, US | |
96 | ![]() | 84 | public | 1977 | Memphis, US | |
97 | ![]() | 82 | public | 1967 | Evansville, US | |
98 | ![]() | 82 | private | 1944 | Pasadena, US | |
99 | ![]() | 79 | private | 1998 | London, GB | |
100 | ![]() | 79 | public | 1994 | Houston, US |
Learn more about our ranking using policy
The results look really interesting. The first place is occupied by a chain of restaurants serving Mexican cuisine – Chipotle Mexican Grill which has 651 points in the United States. On the second place, we will find Verizon, which is the largest mobile telephony operator in the United States. It has over 176800 agents which give him 76th place on our next top companies by employees list.
6. Top companies by employees
The number of employees is another factor that helps us to describe the best companies in the world. The number of employees can certainly be proof of the size of the company but also of the demand for the offered service or product.
We would also like to point out that the given results are presented for local largest companies in us that offer official statistics. Don’t wait and check our results!
# | Name | Employees | Type | Founded | Headquarter | Links |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() | 2200000 | public | 1962 | Bentonville, US | |
2 | ![]() | 632312 | public | 1937 | Wolfsburg, DE | |
3 | ![]() | 630600 | public | 1994 | Seattle, US | |
4 | ![]() | 600000 | public | 1941 | Surrey, GB | |
5 | ![]() | 500000 | private | 1971 | Washington, US | |
6 | ![]() | 488946 | public | 1901 | Søborg, DK | |
7 | ![]() | 460663 | public | 1966 | Issy-les-Moulineaux, FR | |
8 | ![]() | 459000 | public | 1989 | Dublin 4, IE | |
9 | ![]() | 453000 | public | 1883 | Cincinnati, US | |
10 | ![]() | 417929 | public | 1968 | Mumbai, IN | |
11 | ![]() | 413000 | public | 1978 | Atlanta, US | |
12 | ![]() | 410000 | private | 1886 | Gerlingen, DE | |
13 | ![]() | 389000 | public | 1839 | Omaha, US | |
14 | ![]() | 377291 | public | 1971 | Des Moines, US | |
15 | ![]() | 375000 | public | 1967 | Denham, GB | |
16 | ![]() | 371796 | public | 1937 | Toyota City, JP | |
17 | ![]() | 360000 | public | 1962 | Minneapolis, US | |
18 | ![]() | 350600 | public | 1911 | Armonk, US | |
19 | ![]() | 345000 | public | 1934 | Kungsholmen, SE | |
20 | ![]() | 323000 | public | 1866 | Vevey, CH | |
21 | ![]() | 320671 | public | 1969 | Suwon, KR | |
22 | ![]() | 320000 | public | 1960 | Ann Arbor, US | |
23 | ![]() | 308745 | public | 1938 | Seoul, KR | |
24 | ![]() | 305289 | public | 1910 | Tokyo, JP | |
25 | ![]() | 300000 | public | 1980 | Minneapolis, US | |
26 | ![]() | 295000 | public | 1892 | Boston, US | |
27 | ![]() | 295000 | public | 1963 | Woonsocket, US | |
28 | ![]() | 291000 | public | 1971 | Seattle, US | |
29 | ![]() | 284482 | subsidiary | 1886 | Stuttgart, DE | |
30 | ![]() | 283000 | public | 1892 | Boston, US | |
31 | ![]() | 281600 | public | 1994 | Paris, FR | |
32 | ![]() | 280000 | subsidiary | 1939 | Boise, US | |
33 | ![]() | 276973 | private | 1989 | London, GB | |
34 | ![]() | 270000 | public | 1957 | Marlborough, US | |
35 | ![]() | 268000 | public | 1876 | Dallas, US | |
36 | ![]() | 264041 | public | 1806 | Mumbai, IN | |
37 | ![]() | 263900 | private | 1845 | New York, US | |
38 | ![]() | 263000 | public | 1965 | Harrison, US | |
39 | ![]() | 258700 | public | 1852 | San Francisco, US | |
40 | ![]() | 256105 | public | 2000 | New York, US | |
41 | ![]() | 250930 | private | 1998 | London, GB | |
42 | ![]() | 248150 | public | 1907 | Atlanta, US | |
43 | ![]() | 244582 | public | 1871 | Hannover, DE | |
44 | ![]() | 244000 | public | 2014 | Deerfield, US | |
45 | ![]() | 240200 | public | 1934 | Farmington, US | |
46 | ![]() | 240000 | subsidiary | 1901 | Deerfield, US | |
47 | ![]() | 235915 | public | 1899 | London, GB | |
48 | ![]() | 233731 | public | 1865 | London, GB | |
49 | ![]() | 229000 | public | 1980 | Fremont, US | |
50 | ![]() | 227000 | public | 1971 | Memphis, US | |
51 | ![]() | 215675 | public | 1995 | Bonn, DE | |
52 | ![]() | 215638 | public | 1959 | Tokyo, JP | |
53 | ![]() | 211313 | public | 1967 | Paris, FR | |
54 | ![]() | 211000 | public | 1984 | Toronto, CA | |
55 | ![]() | 210000 | public | 1955 | Oak Brook, US | |
56 | ![]() | 205000 | public | 1904 | Charlotte, US | |
57 | ![]() | 204107 | public | 1981 | Bengaluru, IN | |
58 | ![]() | 204000 | public | 1812 | New York, US | |
59 | ![]() | 202713 | public | 1857 | Madrid, ES | |
60 | ![]() | 201000 | public | 1923 | Burbank, US | |
61 | ![]() | 200000 | public | 1969 | Singapore, SG | |
62 | ![]() | 200000 | public | 1946 | Mooresville, US | |
63 | ![]() | 200000 | private | 1930 | Lakeland, US | |
64 | ![]() | 200000 | private | 2016 | Santa Ana, US | |
65 | ![]() | 199000 | public | 1966 | Saint Petersburg, US | |
66 | ![]() | 199000 | public | 1903 | Dearborn, US | |
67 | ![]() | 197673 | public | 1937 | Tokyo, JP | |
68 | ![]() | 197108 | public | 2006 | Luxembourg, LU | |
69 | ![]() | 196000 | public | 1968 | Nashville, US | |
70 | ![]() | 193279 | private | 1987 | Amstelveen, NL | |
71 | ![]() | 184000 | public | 1963 | Philadelphia, US | |
72 | ![]() | 181001 | public | 1665 | Courbevoie, FR | |
73 | ![]() | 180656 | public | 1968 | Orlando, US | |
74 | ![]() | 180000 | private | 1987 | Shenzhen, CN | |
75 | ![]() | 180000 | public | 1939 | Philadelphia, US | |
76 | ![]() | 176800 | subsidiary | Bernards, US | ||
77 | ![]() | 176000 | public | 1927 | Bethesda, US | |
78 | ![]() | 174386 | public | 1985 | Arteixo, ES | |
79 | ![]() | 173000 | public | 1957 | Aurora, CA | |
80 | ![]() | 173000 | public | 1908 | Detroit, US | |
81 | ![]() | 172603 | public | 2008 | Leuven, BE | |
82 | ![]() | 169000 | public | 1853 | Paris, FR | |
83 | ![]() | 169000 | public | 1919 | McLean, US | |
84 | ![]() | 169000 | public | 1917 | Southfield, US | |
85 | ![]() | 163827 | public | 1945 | Bengaluru, IN | |
86 | ![]() | 161851 | public | 1840 | London, GB | |
87 | ![]() | 161659 | subsidiary | 1998 | Mountain View, US | |
88 | ![]() | 160566 | public | 1929 | London, GB | |
89 | ![]() | 157000 | public | 2016 | Round Rock, US | |
90 | ![]() | 166000 | private | 1865 | Minneapolis, US | |
91 | ![]() | 153124 | public | 1836 | Rueil-Malmaison, FR | |
92 | ![]() | 153000 | public | 1916 | Chicago, US | |
93 | ![]() | 150000 | public | 2017 | McLean, US | |
94 | ![]() | 150000 | public | 1999 | Luxembourg, LU | |
95 | ![]() | 150000 | public | 1994 | Dublin, IE | |
96 | ![]() | 149031 | public | 1993 | Paris, FR | |
97 | ![]() | 146915 | investor | Paris, FR | ||
98 | ![]() | 146600 | public | 1988 | Zürich, CH | |
99 | ![]() | 143000 | public | 1976 | Issaquah, US | |
100 | ![]() | 142340 | public | 1921 | Tokyo, JP |
As can you can see above, the largest employer in the USA is Walmark which again ranks first on our list. A number of 2.2 million workers is the largest number of registered employees in the world. The number of agents could be compared to the number of all Lithuanian citizens – as if all the citizens of that country were Walmart workers – this is really impressive! What is more Walmart employments is reputedly well paid and fun. Another one of the largest companies by employees is Amazon which has 630600 agents in the whole United States.
7. Best companies to work for
The last results presented below will be companies that are marked as “best companies to work for” by the employees. Thanks to the information provided, you will be able to find out what the situation looks like in the given company, if you ever want to take up a job or start to establish cooperation. Take a look at this list of company in the USA and find out who is currently the best employer in the United States market.
# | Name | Votes | Ratings | Culture & values | Work/life balance | Type | Headquarter | Links |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() | 10161 | 4.5 | 4.5 | 4.4 | public | Newtown Square, US | |
2 | ![]() | 8609 | 4.4 | 4.4 | 4.1 | subsidiary | Mountain View, US | |
3 | ![]() | 21925 | 4.1 | 4.0 | 3.9 | public | Redmond, US | |
4 | ![]() | 8044 | 4.1 | 4.2 | 4.2 | public | Espoo, FI | |
5 | ![]() | 4294 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 3.7 | public | London, GB | |
6 | ![]() | 14628 | 4.0 | 4.1 | 3.4 | public | Cupertino, US | |
7 | ![]() | 2461 | 3.9 | 3.9 | 3.8 | public | Maplewood, US | |
8 | ![]() | 12644 | 3.9 | 3.8 | 3.8 | public | Santa Clara, US | |
9 | ![]() | 4405 | 3.9 | 3.9 | 3.8 | public | Rueil-Malmaison, FR | |
10 | ![]() | 3620 | 3.9 | 3.8 | 3.9 | public | Dearborn, US | |
11 | ![]() | 42120 | 3.9 | 3.9 | 3.4 | public | Dublin 4, IE | |
12 | ![]() | 3307 | 3.9 | 3.8 | 3.8 | public | New York, US | |
13 | ![]() | 4934 | 3.9 | 4.1 | 3.9 | public | New Brunswick, US | |
14 | ![]() | 18951 | 3.8 | 3.9 | 3.5 | public | Richfield, US | |
15 | ![]() | 513 | 3.8 | 3.8 | 3.7 | public | Clermont-Ferrand, FR | |
16 | ![]() | 1827 | 3.8 | 3.9 | 3.7 | public | Benton Harbor, US | |
17 | ![]() | 1236 | 3.8 | 3.7 | 3.7 | public | Courbevoie, FR | |
18 | ![]() | 1709 | 3.8 | 3.9 | 3.3 | public | Toyota City, JP | |
19 | ![]() | 4172 | 3.8 | 3.7 | 3.6 | public | Memphis, US | |
20 | ![]() | 6647 | 3.8 | 3.9 | 3.3 | public | Bethesda, US | |
21 | ![]() | 27837 | 3.8 | 3.8 | 3.0 | private | New York, US | |
22 | ![]() | 21269 | 3.8 | 4.0 | 3.5 | public | Seattle, US | |
23 | ![]() | 6317 | 3.7 | 3.6 | 3.8 | public | Bethesda, US | |
24 | ![]() | 578 | 3.7 | 3.6 | 3.6 | subsidiary | Stuttgart, DE | |
25 | ![]() | 10814 | 3.7 | 3.2 | 3.2 | public | Pune, IN | |
26 | ![]() | 518 | 3.7 | 3.5 | 3.1 | public | Tokyo, JP | |
27 | ![]() | 2872 | 3.7 | 3.5 | 3.5 | public | Basel, CH | |
28 | ![]() | 425 | 3.7 | 3.6 | 3.3 | public | Illinois City, US | |
29 | ![]() | 36524 | 3.7 | 3.8 | 3.7 | public | Mumbai, IN | |
30 | ![]() | 2947 | 3.7 | 3.7 | 3.3 | public | Vevey, CH | |
31 | ![]() | 2718 | 3.7 | 3.7 | 3.6 | subsidiary | Miami, US | |
32 | ![]() | 3 | 3.64 | 2.0 | 1.0 | public | Toronto, CA | |
33 | ![]() | 28271 | 3.6 | 3.5 | 3.4 | public | Paris, FR | |
34 | ![]() | 871 | 3.6 | 3.8 | 3.5 | public | Paris, FR | |
35 | ![]() | 6885 | 3.6 | 3.2 | 3.2 | public | Morris Plains, US | |
36 | ![]() | 1454 | 3.6 | 3.6 | 3.8 | public | München, DE | |
37 | ![]() | 463 | 3.6 | 3.5 | 3.7 | public | Bonn, DE | |
38 | ![]() | 21154 | 3.6 | 3.5 | 3.5 | public | Charlotte, US | |
39 | ![]() | 44000 | 3.6 | 3.6 | 3.7 | public | Armonk, US | |
40 | ![]() | 2840 | 3.6 | 3.6 | 3.6 | public | Zürich, CH | |
41 | ![]() | 153 | 3.6 | 3.6 | 3.7 | public | Dublin, IE | |
42 | ![]() | 9428 | 3.6 | 3.6 | 3.6 | public | London, GB | |
43 | ![]() | 2739 | 3.6 | 3.6 | 3.5 | public | Chicago, US | |
44 | ![]() | 61 | 3.6 | 3.7 | 2.9 | public | Alvaro Obregon, MX | |
45 | ![]() | 3271 | 3.6 | 3.6 | 3.4 | public | Minneapolis, US | |
46 | ![]() | 98 | 3.6 | 3.5 | 4.1 | public | London, GB | |
47 | ![]() | 944 | 3.6 | 3.6 | 3.5 | public | Singapore, SG | |
48 | ![]() | 7557 | 3.6 | 3.4 | 3.0 | public | Harrison, US | |
49 | ![]() | 9837 | 3.6 | 3.3 | 2.9 | subsidiary | Bernards, US | |
50 | ![]() | 19939 | 3.5 | 3.7 | 3.2 | public | Atlanta, US | |
51 | ![]() | 8855 | 3.5 | 3.8 | 3.9 | public | Stockholm, SE | |
52 | ![]() | 4605 | 3.5 | 3.6 | 3.6 | public | New York, US | |
53 | ![]() | 663 | 3.5 | 3.6 | 3.7 | private | The City of Brighton and Hove, GB | |
54 | ![]() | 995 | 3.5 | 3.4 | 3.2 | public | Aurora, CA | |
55 | ![]() | 14418 | 3.5 | 3.5 | 3.3 | public | New York, US | |
56 | ![]() | 7331 | 3.5 | 3.2 | 3.7 | public | Chicago, US | |
57 | ![]() | 3594 | 3.5 | 3.1 | 3.0 | public | Suwon, KR | |
58 | ![]() | 16090 | 3.4 | 3.3 | 3.0 | public | Mooresville, US | |
59 | ![]() | 21890 | 3.4 | 3.2 | 3.8 | public | Redwood City, US | |
60 | ![]() | 70 | 3.4 | 3.8 | 3.0 | public | Hangzhou, CN | |
61 | ![]() | 3760 | 3.4 | 3.2 | 3.0 | public | Ann Arbor, US | |
62 | ![]() | 715 | 3.4 | 3.3 | 3.4 | public | Farmington, US | |
63 | ![]() | 1375 | 3.3 | 3.1 | 3.2 | public | Surrey, GB | |
64 | ![]() | 91 | 3.3 | 3.0 | 3.3 | public | Kyoto, JP | |
65 | ![]() | 22618 | 3.3 | 3.1 | 3.2 | public | Oak Brook, US | |
66 | ![]() | 765 | 3.3 | 3.2 | 2.8 | public | Saint Petersburg, US | |
67 | ![]() | 890 | 3.3 | 3.2 | 3.2 | public | Paris, FR | |
68 | ![]() | 799 | 3.3 | 3.1 | 3.4 | public | Essen, DE | |
69 | ![]() | 1287 | 3.3 | 3.2 | 3.0 | subsidiary | Bonn, DE | |
70 | ![]() | 12984 | 3.3 | 3.2 | 3.5 | public | Noida, IN | |
71 | ![]() | 14470 | 3.3 | 3.3 | 3.3 | public | Paris, FR | |
72 | ![]() | 32959 | 3.3 | 3.8 | 3.5 | public | Bengaluru, IN | |
73 | ![]() | 9656 | 3.3 | 3.3 | 3.4 | public | Minneapolis, US | |
74 | ![]() | 19236 | 3.2 | 3.6 | 3.3 | public | Bengaluru, IN | |
75 | ![]() | 4499 | 3.2 | 3.0 | 3.4 | public | Bezons, FR | |
76 | ![]() | 214 | 3.2 | 3.0 | 3.1 | public | Wallingford, US | |
77 | ![]() | 754 | 3.2 | 3.0 | 2.9 | public | Tokyo, JP | |
78 | ![]() | 380 | 3.2 | 3.0 | 3.4 | public | Tokyo, JP | |
79 | ![]() | 2354 | 3.2 | 2.8 | 2.8 | public | London, GB | |
80 | ![]() | 40752 | 3.2 | 3.0 | 2.9 | public | Bentonville, US | |
81 | ![]() | 3724 | 3.2 | 3.1 | 3.1 | public | Issy-les-Moulineaux, FR | |
82 | ![]() | 1390 | 3.1 | 3.1 | 2.5 | public | Leuven, BE | |
83 | ![]() | 2939 | 3.1 | 3.0 | 3.0 | public | Glendale, US | |
84 | ![]() | 2583 | 3.1 | 3.2 | 3.4 | public | Minato, JP | |
85 | ![]() | 319 | 3.1 | 2.9 | 2.6 | public | Arteixo, ES | |
86 | ![]() | 519 | 3.1 | 2.8 | 3.0 | public | Søborg, DK | |
87 | ![]() | 4443 | 3.1 | 3.0 | 3.3 | public | Los Angeles, US | |
88 | ![]() | 204 | 3.1 | 3.0 | 3.1 | public | Plymouth, US | |
89 | ![]() | 7702 | 3.1 | 3.1 | 2.9 | public | Cincinnati, US | |
90 | ![]() | 1325 | 3.1 | 2.8 | 2.8 | subsidiary | Boise, US | |
91 | ![]() | 888 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 3.2 | public | Genève, CH | |
92 | ![]() | 101 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | public | Luxembourg, LU | |
93 | ![]() | 853 | 3.0 | 2.6 | 2.5 | public | Seoul, KR | |
94 | ![]() | 2673 | 2.9 | 3.0 | 3.1 | public | Madrid, ES | |
95 | ![]() | 6616 | 2.9 | 2.5 | 2.2 | private | Washington, US | |
96 | ![]() | 1350 | 2.8 | 2.6 | 2.6 | public | Kungsholmen, SE | |
97 | ![]() | 252 | 2.7 | 2.9 | 3.1 | public | Fremont, US | |
98 | ![]() | 5213 | 2.7 | 2.6 | 3.2 | public | McLean, US | |
99 | ![]() | 6 | 2.3 | 1.8 | 1.8 | public | Des Moines, US | |
100 | ![]() | 3 | 2.22 | 1.4 | 2.0 | investor | Paris, FR |
Check out how we get data for our rankings
If you are looking for a good employer, you can certainly get interested in companies such as SAP, Google, Microsoft, Nokia, Unilever, Apple, which have an average grade of more than 4 out of 5 points, which means that working in these companies must be well paid and pleasant. Worth noting is Accenture, a management and technology outsourcing and consulting firm. In our ranking, it has the highest number of votes, as many as 42120, and at the same time, it has a very high grade of 3.9/5.
8. Summary
The data presented above may briefly illustrate the market economy in the United States. Certainly, you can see from the results that companies are developing really fast, most often with the help of developing technology and patents. As we know, American products are characterized by a very high quality of workmanship and reliability. So if you want to start a business in America, you should know that this is a great place to start a new business but you have to maintain high American standards.
If you are looking for them, you can contact Datantify to obtain an American business directory that will help you start your business there. The competition will surely be huge thanks to our bases you will have an easy start! With all the information you have now and the tools you have available, you will achieve success.
If you are looking for contact with the companies listed above or looking for other companies in a specific industry and region, you do not need to search for contact details by yourself. By using Datantify databases you save time and facilitate this process. Don’t hesitate, try today.
Thank you for visiting our website. We hope that this information will be useful to you and your company.

with active e-mails, phone numbers
and more
[…] you could conduct a transaction. No doubt you have heard about more global marketplaces such as Rakuten, eBay, Alibaba, and AliExpress. Using of its services can lead to conquering international markets […]
[…] countries give us an array of possibilities to do. We are able not only to travel abroad but also start an international business. It is a good idea for people who want to expand into global markets, reach a new segment of […]
[…] Read also our previous article:Top 40 companies of ASX by market cap https://datantify.com/knowledge/top-40-companies-of-asx-by-market-cap/ […]
[…] Read also our previous article: TOP 50 Largest Financial Companies in the World in 2020https://datantify.com/knowledge/top-50-largest-financial-companies-in-the-world-in-2020/ […]